NUT package (2.8.0 and below)
-
The latest update for NUT has a link to view the changelog:
https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/commits/devel/sysutils/pfSense-pkg-nut
I have been getting the "This page is taking way too long to load." page from GitHub for the past few days.
How about updating the first post of this thread with each new changelog?
-
As i set the override.battery.charge.low to 50%, does my pfsense then power off the UPS? And can i set this "delay-value"? or can i see this somewhere? Because i waited about 10mins after my pfsense and my Server are shutdown, but the UPS did not power off.
You control this with the "offdelay" parameter to the driver. See the NUT usbhib-ups man page for information. Setting this controls the variable "ups.delay.shutdown". You can read about the various variable in the NUT Variables man page.
-
When I click on Services->UPS I get an alert "Status Alert: The UPS requires attention". The NUT service is setup as a Remote NUT Server. The service is connecting fine to the UPS as I can see values and graphs being populated (correctly). The service is working as expected as well, as when I drop power to the UPS, NUT detects it and does what it is setup to do. Yet I still get the "Status Alert: The UPS requires attention" every time I go to Services->UPS.
Can you clarify some things please?
What do you mean by "The NUT service is setup as a Remote NUT Server"? Is the UPS attached to the pfSense host or to another host?
When you say "I can see values and graphs", are you seeing this on the Services / UPS / Status page?
If present, can you post the content of the UPS Detail section of Services / UPS / Status?
Thanks
Alanper, did you get your issue resolved?
-
The latest update for NUT has a link to view the changelog:
https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/commits/devel/sysutils/pfSense-pkg-nut
I have been getting the "This page is taking way too long to load." page from GitHub for the past few days.
How about updating the first post of this thread with each new changelog?
It will be updated if there is something meaningful in a new version. The update released last week was solely to remove the orphan "NUT" menu item that would occur if the old package was not removed before install as discussed earlier in this thread. You can view the diff directly here.
-
When I click on Services->UPS I get an alert "Status Alert: The UPS requires attention". The NUT service is setup as a Remote NUT Server. The service is connecting fine to the UPS as I can see values and graphs being populated (correctly). The service is working as expected as well, as when I drop power to the UPS, NUT detects it and does what it is setup to do. Yet I still get the "Status Alert: The UPS requires attention" every time I go to Services->UPS.
Can you clarify some things please?
What do you mean by "The NUT service is setup as a Remote NUT Server"? Is the UPS attached to the pfSense host or to another host?
When you say "I can see values and graphs", are you seeing this on the Services / UPS / Status page?
If present, can you post the content of the UPS Detail section of Services / UPS / Status?
Thanks
Alanper, did you get your issue resolved?
Sorry for the delayed response. Trying to catch up on everything…
I have attached screenshots of my UPS status and settings page. Yep, seeing the values on the UPS Status page. The UPS is not attached to the pfSense host, it is attached to another host on the local network.
-
I have attached screenshots of my UPS status and settings page. Yep, seeing the values on the UPS Status page.
The warning that the UPS requires attention appears to be correct. Note that the status is "On line, Bypass"? Bypass is bad. Bypass means that the UPS inverter has been bypassed and will not take over if the mains fail. If you scroll down to the bottom of the UPS Detail section, you should see a field titled "ups.alarm" which will hopefully give you a better indication of why bypass is active.
I'm surprised that there wouldn't be an alarm going off on the thing.
-
I have attached screenshots of my UPS status and settings page. Yep, seeing the values on the UPS Status page.
The warning that the UPS requires attention appears to be correct. Note that the status is "On line, Bypass"? Bypass is bad. Bypass means that the UPS inverter has been bypassed and will not take over if the mains fail. If you scroll down to the bottom of the UPS Detail section, you should see a field titled "ups.alarm" which will hopefully give you a better indication of why bypass is active.
I'm surprised that there wouldn't be an alarm going off on the thing.
For all intents and purposes, the UPS is functioning correctly (aside from the bypass status reading). I am using a generic UPS driver for NUT (it was a trial and error process at the time to find a driver that worked as there was none from the UPS manufacturer), perhaps that is the cause for the "incorrect" bypass reading (I say incorrect because if I disconnect the mains the UPS functions correctly). Anyway, it's not a major problem for me as it is just aesthetics for now.
-
Okay, glad it's working.
Was nutdrv_qx one of the drivers you tried?
-
Okay, glad it's working.
Was nutdrv_qx one of the drivers you tried?
I don't recall specifically at the time if I tried the driver. However, I tried it today and it does not work. Currently the blazer_ser driver is working (the best) for my setup.
-
Thanks alanper, appreciate you letting me know.
-
Hi
I have recently upgraded to 2.3 - specifically 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (i386) - on my Alix device. In the process NUT was upgraded to 2.7.4_3. On visiting the NUT service page I was asked to confirm the upgrade settings. The UPS Type (local serial) and Driver (apcsmart) had been preserved so I didn't think further and hit 'save'. NUT didn't work despite restart. I believe I know why as I have successfully worked around…
By hitting 'save' I overwrote the correct serial port setting with one of the ones presented by the drop-down on the serial port field. The issue seems to be this... the serial port only allowed me to choose from the two built in UARTS on the board /dev/cuau[0-1]. I have a USB-to-serial adapter and this assigns a character device called /dev/cuaU0 (note U/C 'U'). Once I had SSH'd into the box and spotted the issue, editing the conf file and restarting NUT cause everything to spring back into life.
I should also say that I am new to this sort of meddling with conf files. I think these are not really the masters as far as configuration is concerned, i.e. they are auto-generated from elsewhere. i can see, for example that my entries in the other ups*.conf files are not reflected in the NUT UI. Should I be doing this a different way?
BTW, thanks for all the efforts porting this service, I hope this feedback proves useful.
Regards
- Steve
-
Sorry about the problem Steve. Best that I can tell, in FreeBSD 10.3 and above call-out serial ports are all supposed to match the pattern "/dev/cuau?" which the device you have doesn't. Is the driver for this adapter included in the FreeBSD distribution or is it something that you had to install separately from the vendor? Can you tell me the name of the driver?
I don't have an issue adding support for uppercase 'U', but I would like to make I understand what's going on first. Thanks.
The issue seems to be this… the serial port only allowed me to choose from the two built in UARTS on the board /dev/cuau[0-1]. I have a USB-to-serial adapter and this assigns a character device called /dev/cuaU0 (note U/C 'U').
-
Hi,
The driver is called "uchcom.ko".
Cheers
- Steve
-
Dennypage,
I've seen an issue going on where the NUT service gets reset if the WAN connection is lost causing UPS communication loss. My current setup has my ATT modem in a different area not on UPS backup, so when the power flickers the modem resets. This is not a permanent setup, eventually the modem will be relocated inside the main rack which it will then be powered by the same UPS as the pfsense box.
However, if my WAN link goes down, why should the NUT service be affected? If an extended power outage was to happen currently keeping my WAN link down, the pfsense box would never shutdown because its now lost communication with the UPS.
-
Hey Bulldog. pfSense restarts services when the WAN interface disconnects/reconnects. Yes, this is unnecessary for some services such as NUT, but there is no way for pfSense to know which services actually need to be restarted.
What you would expect to see is NUT restart once when the interface goes down, and once again when the interface comes back up. Is this what you are seeing? Or are you seeing the NUT service stopped the entire time the interface is down?
-
Hey Bulldog. pfSense restarts services when the WAN interface disconnects/reconnects. Yes, this is unnecessary for some services such as NUT, but there is no way for pfSense to know which services actually need to be restarted.
What you would expect to see is NUT restart once when the interface goes down, and once again when the interface comes back up. Is this what you are seeing? Or are you seeing the NUT service stopped the entire time the interface is down?
I will need to verify if it stays dead the entire time.
-
Steve, I've pushed a fix for this. The release number will be 2.7.4_4. It may take a few days to work it's way through the system.
Thank you for your help in sorting this out. Much appreciated.
The issue seems to be this… the serial port only allowed me to choose from the two built in UARTS on the board /dev/cuau[0-1]. I have a USB-to-serial adapter and this assigns a character device called /dev/cuaU0 (note U/C 'U').
-
Or, it could come out the same day it's pushed. :)
Steve, when you have a minute, can you confirm that this fixed the issue for you please?
Thanks.
Steve, I've pushed a fix for this. The release number will be 2.7.4_4. It may take a few days to work it's way through the system.
-
hello,
I have an "NoName Polish brand" ups connected on Local USB that work with blazer driver in 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64).
I get few emails every day with "UPS is unavailable" and "Communication with UPS lost" even I set cron to restart NUT every 9 minute.
Is it possible to edit and add NUT restart command to UPS monitoring module instead of sending this emails ?
Any idea where to look ?Usually a manual restart of UPS monitoring daemon it fix the problem before cron but it is getting annoying to receive so many emails and entries in syslog from NUT… :o
thank you
edit:
I try now to automate restart ups service with:
upssched.conf
CMDSCRIPT /usr/local/bin/custom-upssched-cmd PIPEFN /var/db/nut/upssched.pipe LOCKFN /var/db/nut/upssched.lock AT NOCOMM * START-TIMER ups-no-comm 20 AT COMMBAD * START-TIMER ups-comm-bad 20 AT COMMOK * CANCEL-TIMER ups-comm-bad COMMOKcustom-upssched-cmd
#!/bin/sh NAME=`basename $0` LOGGER="/usr/bin/logger -t $NAME" case $1 in ups-no-comm|ups-comm-bad) $LOGGER "Timer event '$1' fired, restarting NUT..." /usr/local/etc/rc.d/nut.sh restart ;; *) $LOGGER "Unrecognized command: '$1'" ;; esac -
Continual disconnects generally indicate an issue with the driver, USB hardware, or with the UPS itself. Before trying to implement scripting work-arounds, I would recommend confirming the source of the problem. Lots of suggestions for this…
First thing I would check would be the physicals: good USB cable, direct connection with no hub, etc. Also, try a different USB port and see if this affects the behavior. Run "usbconfig dump_device_desc" during normal operation. What is the vendor id? Does it match what you expect? Run usbconfig again after the disconnect happens. Does the device still appear?
I would also validate the NUT driver. Did the vendor recommend using the blazer driver? Have you tried any of the other usb based drivers? On the Services / UPS /Status page, do all the items in the UPS Detail section make sense? Are they reasonable values? If not, then there is a driver/configuration problem.
