Watchguard Firebox M440
-
Create that file if it's not there. You can create the file and put that value in it by running:
echo 'boot_verbose="1"' >> /boot/loader.conf.local -
@stephenw10 said in Watchguard Firebox M440:
Create that file if it's not there. You can create the file and put that value in it by running:
echo 'boot_verbose="1"' >> /boot/loader.conf.localOk.. Here are the results of the usbconfig command...
-
@stephenw10 said in Watchguard Firebox M440:
Create that file if it's not there. You can create the file and put that value in it by running:
echo 'boot_verbose="1"' >> /boot/loader.conf.localOk.. Here are the results with verbose turned on I hope... Maybe I'm doing something incorrect.
-
Ok, no USB devices we don't expect, shame.
The verbose console output should contain a lot more information than that.
Do you still see that line in the correct file? Here's a box I just booted verbose to test:[2.4.4-RELEASE][root@5100.stevew.lan]/root: cat /boot/loader.conf.local boot_verbose="1"Steve
-
@stephenw10 said in Watchguard Firebox M440:
Ok, no USB devices we don't expect, shame.
The verbose console output should contain a lot more information than that.
Do you still see that line in the correct file? Here's a box I just booted verbose to test:[2.4.4-RELEASE][root@5100.stevew.lan]/root: cat /boot/loader.conf.local boot_verbose="1"Steve
I think I got it. Here is another file. Verbose is turned on.. This is the same size as my first verbose file upload.. Let me know...
0_1539476506397_BootLog with Verbose_3.txt -
@stephenw10 said in Watchguard Firebox M440:
Ok, no USB devices we don't expect, shame.
The verbose console output should contain a lot more information than that.
Do you still see that line in the correct file? Here's a box I just booted verbose to test:[2.4.4-RELEASE][root@5100.stevew.lan]/root: cat /boot/loader.conf.local boot_verbose="1"Steve
I think I got it now... Here is another version of the log file with verbose turned on...
-
Ah there we go! A lot more information there but unfortunately nothing significant regarding the igb NICs.
Noting a couple of relevant links:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228202
Not directly relevant but describes igb debug mode which we could try here to get more.
If it is that same error it's not surprising considering there is no PHY.https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/ubuntu-18-igb-driver-problem-on-marvell-88e1680-4175633325/
That is concerning as it shows Ubuntu also fails to attach with it's default driver. Potentially there is some issue with a resource conflict or it could be that the switch requires something before it presents to the NICs correctly. Though it doesn't look like that in the WGOS boot log. Nor does it look like they are using a custom driver there.
In that particular case though the OP has failed to understand how the switch is attached. 88e1680 is irrelevant.Other possible workarounds we cannot try here as the BIOS is locked; disable PXE, disable VT-d.
If that is a regression it would be worth booting 2.3.5 to see if that behaves the same.
Do you have a TTL serial cable of the sort that can be connected to J5?
Steve
-
@stephenw10 said in Watchguard Firebox M440:
Ah there we go! A lot more information there but unfortunately nothing significant regarding the igb NICs.
Noting a couple of relevant links:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228202
Not directly relevant but describes igb debug mode which we could try here to get more.
If it is that same error it's not surprising considering there is no PHY.https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/ubuntu-18-igb-driver-problem-on-marvell-88e1680-4175633325/
That is concerning as it shows Ubuntu also fails to attach with it's default driver. Potentially there is some issue with a resource conflict or it could be that the switch requires something before it presents to the NICs correctly. Though it doesn't look like that in the WGOS boot log. Nor does it look like they are using a custom driver there.
In that particular case though the OP has failed to understand how the switch is attached. 88e1680 is irrelevant.Other possible workarounds we cannot try here as the BIOS is locked; disable PXE, disable VT-d.
If that is a regression it would be worth booting 2.3.5 to see if that behaves the same.
Do you have a TTL serial cable of the sort that can be connected to J5?
Steve
No.. I don't have TTL serial cable. I want to be clear on what you want me to do.. Here is what I think.
- In the sys/dev/e1000/e1000_osdep.h set DBG to 1.
- Boot from version 2.3.5 (where can I get this version).
- Connect TTL serial cable to jumper J5.
-
Going back to the BIOS discussion, it is prompting me for a password to enter the setup. Is there a way to clear or reset the password?
-
The igb driver with dbg set to 1 would require the module recompiling after making that change. Non-trivial.
The 2.3.5 install image can be found here:
https://nyifiles.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/pfSense-CE-memstick-serial-2.3.5-RELEASE-amd64.img.gzIt would be interesting to see what is on J5. If it was me I would put a scope on it first to check what the voltage level and baud rate is. However most people don't have access to that.
That may be the only way to configure the switch in the absence of a driver for the Marvell PCI interface.There is probably no way to remove the password from the BIOS. It's set by default so resetting the CMOS for example will not help.
Steve
-
@stephenw10 said in Watchguard Firebox M440:
The igb driver with dbg set to 1 would require the module recompiling after making that change. Non-trivial.
The 2.3.5 install image can be found here:
https://nyifiles.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/pfSense-CE-memstick-serial-2.3.5-RELEASE-amd64.img.gzIt would be interesting to see what is on J5. If it was me I would put a scope on it first to check what the voltage level and baud rate is. However most people don't have access to that.
That may be the only way to configure the switch in the absence of a driver for the Marvell PCI interface.There is probably no way to remove the password from the BIOS. It's set by default so resetting the CMOS for example will not help.
Steve
For some reason, the M440 is not booting from the 2.3.5 image on the SSD. I selected the ISO image. Not sure what is going on...
Ok.. Maybe I selected the wrong 2.3.5 image.
-
For some reason, pfSense 2.3.5 will not boot at all on the M440. I tried installing this version on a SSD and Hard Drive and the M440 is not booting from the disk (SSD or HD). Installed v 2.4.4 on the SSD and it is booting fine.. Not sure what is going on with version 2.3.5.
-
Hmm, it's probably a UEFI boot issue. I could believe it only boots UEFI from SATA. Not sure I ever tested that on the m400.
Do you have a spare CF card you can try the 2.3.5 Nano image on?
Steve
-
I guess we are finding out that pfSense will not recognize the 24 ports that is part of the switch. I assume I made a bad purchase and will need to try to sell these units to get my money back. Really disappointing.
-
@stephenw10 said in Watchguard Firebox M440:
Hmm, it's probably a UEFI boot issue. I could believe it only boots UEFI from SATA. Not sure I ever tested that on the m400.
Do you have a spare CF card you can try the 2.3.5 Nano image on?
Steve
I have a Transcend 8GB Compact Flash card. So, I will try that.. What is the version I need to download and install on the CF?
-
This: https://nyifiles.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/pfSense-CE-2.3.5-RELEASE-2g-amd64-nanobsd.img.gz
Though I just tested it on the m400 and it doesn't boot even from the CF slot. It probably is UEFI only which was in 2.4.
We have only been trying for a few days so far, it took far longer than that for some of the other stuff we now have access to.
However I agree this is not good target really. Certainly there are far easier things to install pfSense on. But if you wan a challenge this looks like it!There is more stuff we can try.
Steve
-
I’m up for the challenge. What’s next?
-
I got version 2.3.5 booting on the CF. Will upload the boot file.
-
Here is the boot file for version 2.3.5. Same results in that it only recognize the 3 interfaces.
-
Here is a better copy of the 2.3.5 log file.
