Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PC Engines apu2 experiences

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    711 Posts 73 Posters 900.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dugeem
      last edited by

      PC Engines / 3mdeb have released new coreboot firmware:

      • mainline v4.9.0.3 (link https://pcengines.github.io/#mr-20)
      • legacy v4.0.25 (link https://pcengines.github.io/#lr-17).

      Both now offer ability in sortbootorder to disable Core Boost (default is enabled).

      v4.9.0.3 also includes some additonal firmware fixes and support for SMBIOS memory capability types 16 & 17. The command

      dmidecode -t 16 -t 17
      

      now works as expected on APU2 with 4GB.

      Installed mainline v4.9.0.3 on my test APU2 with no issues.

      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • QinnQ
        Qinn
        last edited by

        Thanks for the update, I will install it asap.

        Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
        Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
        Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kevindd992002 @dugeem
          last edited by

          @dugeem said in PC Engines apu2 experiences:

          SMBIOS memory capability types 16 & 17

          Where does one use "SMBIOS memory capability types 16 & 17"?

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dugeem @kevindd992002
            last edited by dugeem

            @kevindd992002 For informational purposes only with dmidecode. Arguably this should have already been in the firmware but since it took time for 3mdeb to get ECC working (due to lack of AMD documentation) it probably hasn’t mattered.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • cwagzC
              cwagz
              last edited by

              How does the APU2C4 with the new BIOS compare to a Fitlet2 J3455? Does anyone know the boost clock that the APU will get up to now? Forgive me if I missed this info earlier in the thread.

              Netgate 6100 MAX

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dugeem @cwagz
                last edited by

                @cwagz

                With AMD CPB enabled in latest APU2 BIOS a lightly loaded (i.e. no more than single core active) APU2 CPU will boost from normal 1.0Ghz up to 1.4GHz. In the real world the gain is less - around 20% (see 3mdeb tech notes https://3mdeb.com/firmware/amd-cpu-boost/).

                The quad core Celeron J3455 CPU has a base frequency of 1.5GHz and boosts to 2.3GHz - this would suggest it should offer ~50% higher performance than the AMD GX-412TC. Benchmarking would be required to confirm this.

                However before selecting router hardware there are many other considerations apart from just CPU performance. EG. bandwidth, budget, form factor, interfaces, storage etc

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • fireodoF
                  fireodo
                  last edited by

                  Hi, I made the update on my APU2C0 board to coreboot legacy ver. 4.0.25 and after 2 days everything works fine - the only thing that I can see is that the CPU temperature is slightly lower (4-5°) than before the update (same environment conditions). Maybe it is in context of AMD CPB activation.

                  Have a fine Weekend,
                  fireodo

                  Kettop Mi4300YL CPU: i5-4300Y @ 1.60GHz RAM: 8GB Ethernet Ports: 4
                  SSD: SanDisk pSSD-S2 16GB (ZFS) WiFi: WLE200NX
                  pfsense 2.8.0 CE
                  Packages: Apcupsd, Cron, Iftop, Iperf, LCDproc, Nmap, pfBlockerNG, RRD_Summary, Shellcmd, Snort, Speedtest, System_Patches.

                  VeldkornetV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • VeldkornetV
                    Veldkornet @fireodo
                    last edited by

                    @fireodo said in PC Engines apu2 experiences:

                    Hi, I made the update on my APU2C0 board to coreboot legacy ver. 4.0.25 and after 2 days everything works fine - the only thing that I can see is that the CPU temperature is slightly lower (4-5°) than before the update (same environment conditions). Maybe it is in context of AMD CPB activation.

                    Have a fine Weekend,
                    fireodo

                    Yes, the CPU can now enter C6 idle-state as well when needed which is a deeper power saving state. More power saving = less heat.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • QinnQ
                      Qinn
                      last edited by

                      Is it useful to enable PowerD now?

                      Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                      Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                      Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                      W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W
                        wgentine @Qinn
                        last edited by

                        @qinn No. CPB is not describe in ACPI so, powerd doesn't know.

                        cwagzC D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • QinnQ
                          Qinn
                          last edited by

                          Thanks

                          Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                          Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                          Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • VeldkornetV
                            Veldkornet
                            last edited by Veldkornet

                            Does anyone else use the gwled package for the other 2 lights on the front?

                            I noticed that it’s using massive amounts of CPU, pushing the load average well above 20. Even disabling doesn’t fix it, only removing the package helps. Below is only a snippet of "px auxw", there are still many more processes of the same.

                            USER      PID  %CPU %MEM    VSZ    RSS TT  STAT STARTED        TIME COMMAND
                            root       11 156.5  0.0      0     64  -  RNL  Wed17   16794:28.46 [idle]
                            root    55074   4.6  0.9  96292  35144  -  R    12:28       0:00.59 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    57431   4.5  0.9  96292  35144  -  R    12:28       0:00.60 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    58665   4.5  0.9  96292  35144  -  R    12:28       0:00.58 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    56863   4.4  0.8  96420  34636  -  R    12:28       0:00.56 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    58037   4.4  0.9  96292  35144  -  R    12:28       0:00.59 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    51369   4.3  0.9  96304  35948  -  R    12:28       0:00.65 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    52694   4.3  0.9  96292  35144  -  R    12:28       0:00.60 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    53220   4.3  0.9  96292  35144  -  R    12:28       0:00.59 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    56211   4.3  0.9  96292  35144  -  R    12:28       0:00.58 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    57826   4.3  0.9  98468  35212  -  R    12:28       0:00.56 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    58322   4.3  0.9  96292  35144  -  R    12:28       0:00.58 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    58337   4.3  0.9  98468  35212  -  R    12:28       0:00.56 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    51633   4.1  0.8  96420  34584  -  R    12:28       0:00.56 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    52119   4.1  0.9  96420  35268  -  R    12:28       0:00.57 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    55153   4.1  0.9  98468  35212  -  R    12:28       0:00.55 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    56521   4.1  0.8  98468  35036  -  R    12:28       0:00.54 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    58153   4.1  0.9  98468  35212  -  R    12:28       0:00.54 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    39184   4.0  7.5 339404 308808  -  Ss   22:56      48:49.73 /usr/local/bin/suricata -i igb1 -D -c /usr/local/etc/suricata/s
                            root    51525   4.0  0.9  96292  35160  -  R    12:28       0:00.58 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            root    57568   4.0  0.9  98468  35200  -  R    12:28       0:00.54 /usr/local/bin/php-cgi -q /usr/local/bin/gwled.php
                            

                            See here the difference in CPU after removing the package:
                            0_1552823095743_Capture.PNG

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Hmm, odd. Actual CPU time on those processes is all pretty small though. You see it generating those everytime at boot?

                              Steve

                              VeldkornetV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • cwagzC
                                cwagz @wgentine
                                last edited by

                                @wgentine said in PC Engines apu2 experiences:

                                @qinn No. CPB is not describe in ACPI so, powerd doesn't know.

                                Is it a best practice to disable powerd then?

                                Netgate 6100 MAX

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  Powerd doesn't do anything on the APU anyway, there's no driver for cpufreq to use.

                                  Mar 17 17:48:47 	php-fpm 	92195 	/system_advanced_misc.php: The command '/usr/sbin/powerd -b 'hadp' -a 'hadp' -n 'hadp'' returned exit code '69', the output was 'powerd: no cpufreq(4) support -- aborting: No such file or directory' 
                                  

                                  Steve

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • VeldkornetV
                                    Veldkornet @stephenw10
                                    last edited by Veldkornet

                                    @stephenw10 said in PC Engines apu2 experiences:

                                    Hmm, odd. Actual CPU time on those processes is all pretty small though. You see it generating those everytime at boot?

                                    Steve

                                    Hmm, I’ll have to check what it is at boot. I haven’t put much time into investigating it. Looking at the SNMP though, this is the first time the CPU has dropped down (after uninstalling the package). So, I guess it starts up pretty quick after boot since I don’t even see a dent in the SNMP.

                                    Just watching “top”, it seems to come in bursts, like every 10 seconds for 5 seconds long for example.
                                    A wild guess is that that’s how often it polls the gateways.

                                    I just re-installed pfSense from scratch, not restoring any backups, and it still does it.

                                    Since there’s not much to configure, I assume anyone could reproduce it. If not, I’m really curious as to what’s so special about my system.

                                    You can basically choose what the last 2 lights are, which I have as:
                                    2 - WAN_DHCP4
                                    3 - VPN

                                    I've made a new topic for this here

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D
                                      dugeem @wgentine
                                      last edited by dugeem

                                      @wgentine True - although as soon as powerd sets CPU frequency to maximum GX-412TC frequency 1000MHz via ACPI then AMD CPB is available - however whether CPB it is used depends on CPU core state & thermal parameters.

                                      Although the question of whether powerd is still useful for APU2 given both the CPB performance gains and power savings is interesting...

                                      Edit: some excellent CPB info here https://github.com/pcengines/apu2-documentation/blob/master/docs/debug/cpu_frequency.md

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        dugeem @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10 You mean the original APU (with AMD G-T40E CPU) - not the APU2 (with AMD GX-412TC CPU) right? No issues with powerd on APU2 (although whether it makes any sense now with CPB is the issue)

                                        stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @dugeem
                                          last edited by

                                          @dugeem Ah, true! That was referring to the original APU, my mistake.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • VeldkornetV
                                            Veldkornet
                                            last edited by

                                            Is anyone using the CoDel / FQ_CoDel Traffic Shaping on the APU2?

                                            Working well? Any problems?

                                            cwagzC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.