Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfSense nic freeze

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    25 Posts 3 Posters 2.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      microkid
      last edited by

      When it froze, I tried to connect to the shell and GUI but was not able to. There was also no crash dump mentioned in the GUI after the restart. The only thing I can try next time, is hook up a keyboard and display and see if I get into the thing.

      DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DaddyGoD
        DaddyGo @microkid
        last edited by

        @microkid

        it’s a good idea, but in the meantime, pay attention to that as well:

        https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/development/obtaining-panic-information-for-developers.html

        2a18c285-f3b4-4abd-9786-b326d001ec12-image.png

        SSH into the box and look for the information, for example with WinSCP, Putty, etc

        Cats bury it so they can't see it!
        (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          microkid
          last edited by

          checked, but there is no crash dump in /var/crash. So it really seems the nic's just froze, as there was no way to communicate with pfSense anymore in any way.

          DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DaddyGoD
            DaddyGo @microkid
            last edited by

            @microkid

            if there was a problem with the NIC, you would also see it from the shell
            the NIC is not a separate animal in your pfSense box that lives a separate life 😉

            so observation remains when the collapse occurs.... (via shell)

            Cats bury it so they can't see it!
            (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • I
              Impatient
              last edited by

              Disable all those package's and try it for a period of time.

              Probably using all the memory when Snort or pfBlocker update's.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                microkid
                last edited by

                Memory never comes above 50% for the last 2 weeks.

                DaddyGoD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DaddyGoD
                  DaddyGo @microkid
                  last edited by

                  @microkid

                  believe me it's just a guess from now on
                  one thing you can do is throw up a Linux on it and pressure it a hard hardware stress test

                  -or you wait until the next collapse

                  Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                  (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DaddyGoD
                    DaddyGo @microkid
                    last edited by DaddyGo

                    @microkid

                    +++++
                    by the way @Impatient is trying to tell you that updating the described packages has high memory usage ...
                    well, you don't even see these when they happen and the system crashes (randomly)

                    Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                    (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      microkid
                      last edited by

                      Just ran a stress test for 10 minutes.
                      stress-ng --metrics --cpu 4 --vm 4 --vm-bytes 2G --io 2

                      CPU 100%, mem 99%. Rock stable, not a glitch. Still being able to download at 250Mbps.

                      DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DaddyGoD
                        DaddyGo @microkid
                        last edited by

                        @microkid

                        yes these mistakes are the worst
                        like looking for a needle in a haystack

                        I would otherwise sharpen the test to network transmission....

                        since the CPU and MEM test is good in the short term, but think about it if it’s a longer term thing
                        for example, a thermal heat run error and only occurs if the temperature on one of the active elements on the MOBO is higher for a long time

                        Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                        (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          microkid @DaddyGo
                          last edited by

                          @DaddyGo Good point. But the load on the device is usually very low. It's just an home router/firewall. CPU is normally <5% and memory around 40. With my usage, I don't expect high temperatures very soon :)

                          DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DaddyGoD
                            DaddyGo @microkid
                            last edited by

                            @microkid

                            what you are writing about is a relative state of rest
                            routing does not require power machines 😉

                            I understand all this and and I know the pfSense resource needs..
                            I have seen huge pfBlockerNG lists loading with 98% CPU and 4GB RAM usage (on APU 4d4 board)
                            it was of course an overloaded pfSense box and an unreasonably large list

                            this can happen when you are not supervising the box and not seeing it

                            but eventually kills the OP system
                            it randomly occurs, as your problem

                            Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                            (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              microkid
                              last edited by

                              I understand. However, pfBlockerNG is updating every hour, as are more things. The monitor log does show a little increase on memory usage at that moment, nothing else. Will keep an eye on it.

                              DaddyGoD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DaddyGoD
                                DaddyGo @microkid
                                last edited by

                                @microkid

                                hard, hard...

                                it really remains to seize the moment and and you can do any investigation when the incident happens.
                                for now - because nowhere to find anything (crash report, suspicious logs) you can only wait.

                                BTW: I don't think that pfSense problem is this...

                                Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                                (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DaddyGoD
                                  DaddyGo @microkid
                                  last edited by

                                  @microkid

                                  one more idea:
                                  what about the latest BIOS?
                                  since the ACPI FW code can cause such a stupid situation

                                  Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                                  (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    microkid
                                    last edited by

                                    The device is on the lastest bios from 2018. No newer bios was released since then.

                                    DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DaddyGoD
                                      DaddyGo @microkid
                                      last edited by

                                      @microkid

                                      this can be a problem (looks like old BIOS)
                                      what do you see after that(?):

                                      dmesg | grep 'error'
                                      dmesg | grep 'Firmware*'

                                      Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                                      (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        microkid
                                        last edited by

                                        dmesg|grep 'error'
                                        module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vesa, 0xffffffff812d9960, 0) error 19
                                        WARNING: /: mount pending error: blocks 48 files 2

                                        dmesg | grep 'Firmware*'
                                        <no output>

                                        DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DaddyGoD
                                          DaddyGo @microkid
                                          last edited by DaddyGo

                                          @microkid

                                          áááhhhááá,

                                          Are you on UFS?
                                          why not ZFS?

                                          this can be due to a lot of violent downtime (crash)

                                          the VESA error is fine (it's strong, hihihi), who also has a VGA controller on the MOBO
                                          but it is "WARNING: /: mount pending error: blocks 48 files 2"

                                          https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/mount-pending-error.67573/

                                          read it and then:

                                          https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/hardware/troubleshooting-disk-check-errors-fsck.html
                                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DKr1Dvan5I

                                          Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                                          (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            microkid
                                            last edited by

                                            @DaddyGo said in pfSense nic freeze:

                                            WARNING: /: mount pending error: blocks 48 files 2"

                                            AFAIK, his is expected, as I had to pull the power to reboot the device. So the disk was not clean shutdown.

                                            DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.