Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Seamless roaming

    Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
    9
    265
    89.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by johnpoz

      What speed you see is going to have lots and lots of variables to be sure.. Just because user X gets speed Y, doesn't mean you will see the same speed even if using the same AP, same firmware and even same client.

      If you were getting better speed with firmware A, then run firmware A and not B - unless there is something in B that you really really want/need. Then when firmware C comes out - try that one.

      To me the difference on say a phone or tablet between 300mbps and 550 is pretty pointless - since anything you do on such a device is going to be way lower than that ;) Even streaming a 4k movie would require less than 100mbps for example.

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mcury @johnpoz
        last edited by

        @johnpoz Yes, but it's strange, he is getting twice speed as me..
        I'm stuck somehow at 300Mbps, he got 613.. I'll try another firmware to be sure about this..
        Unfortunately I can't test right now, otherwise my family would ban me from my house 😁

        dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by johnpoz

          What was the PHY his client was connected at? Going to be a big different if your at 866.7 and he was at 1300 (3 streams)... Which could be the case and could explain his 600 number.. Which seems pretty freaking high for a 867 PHY.. 70% real world bandwidth seems a bit unlikely.. But if at a 1300 phy, then 613 is more in the realistic area of the overhead for wifi.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            mcury
            last edited by

            According to his post, he was using an Apple device, 866/866Mbps

            https://community.ui.com/releases/UAP-USW-Firmware-5-24-0-11950/74e3acca-9a22-4fa0-b76c-c654854638d4#comment/418023aa-13b2-43b0-b2b0-7fc94de12ad3

            dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by johnpoz

              Well I don't buy his numbers to be honest... 70% real world seems a bit optimistic to be sure ;)

              If you want a real world test - load up all your devices doing speed tests at the same exact time.. What is the combined throughput.. That is what is going to matter.. Doing what mobile devices do - the difference between even 300 and 550 is not going to really be noticed by the user.. Is your music going to stream slower ;) Maybe your movie buffers for .2 seconds longer before it starts ;)

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JKnottJ
                JKnott @johnpoz
                last edited by

                @johnpoz said in Seamless roaming:

                Huh? That is not how unifi works at all.

                I wasn't talking about Unifi. I was referring to systems that use controllers for log in and controlling access to the APs. I first heard of this 11-12 years ago, but I've forgotten the company name. They referred to it as "blanket" WiFi. With that system, you had to use their switch and not just plain PoE.

                PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                UniFi AC-Lite access point

                I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  mcury
                  last edited by

                  Yes, you are completely right :)
                  It's working flawless, roaming events happening, I can't really complain about it. :)

                  dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • QinnQ
                    Qinn
                    last edited by

                    Anyone any idea how I can get more info on the following failure: "WPA Authentication Timeout/Failure", which is under "Association Failures" in the dashboard. Tried finding it under "Events" nothing and there is no data at all under Alerts.

                    Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                    Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                    Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      mcury @Qinn
                      last edited by

                      @Qinn You can try a cat /var/log/messages inside the AP, just ssh to it.

                      dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                      QinnQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • QinnQ
                        Qinn @mcury
                        last edited by

                        @mcury Good thinking, so did it and downloaded 4 files from

                        /var/log 
                        
                        fastapply
                        lastlog
                        messages
                        messages.old
                        

                        First 2 were empty in the last 2 the failure was not mentioned.

                        Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                        Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                        Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          mcury @Qinn
                          last edited by

                          @Qinn You would be getting something like this:

                          nanohd-BZ.v5.24.0# cat /var/log/messages | grep failure
                          Thu Jul 9 08:16:26 2020 user.info : stahtd[20294]: [STA-TRACKER].stahtd_dump_event(): {"auth_delta":"0","message_type":"STA_ASSOC_TRACKER","mac":"X:X:X:X:X:X","vap":"ra0","wpa_auth_failures":"1","event_type":"failure","assoc_status":"0","assoc_delta":"0","event_id":"2","auth_ts":"61017.241076"}

                          dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                          QinnQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • QinnQ
                            Qinn @mcury
                            last edited by Qinn

                            @mcury said in Seamless roaming:

                            cat /var/log/messages | grep failure

                            GRumpff 🙃 , did a

                            cat /var/log/messages | grep Failure
                            

                            instead of

                             cat /var/log/messages | grep failure
                            

                            Found it, thanks!!

                            Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                            Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                            Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              mcury
                              last edited by

                              Reverted the nanohd firmware back to the stable version, 4.3.20, and the 300Mbps limitation is no longer happening..
                              Just saying this for information purposes, not that the users will really notice that, but I'm getting now around 600.

                              dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                              QinnQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • QinnQ
                                Qinn @mcury
                                last edited by

                                @mcury Thanks for the info

                                Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                                Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                                Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  @mcury said in Seamless roaming:

                                  but I'm getting now around 600

                                  On a 866.7 PHY?

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    mcury @johnpoz
                                    last edited by

                                    @johnpoz Yeap.
                                    5GHz 80MHz, phone shows 866Mbps

                                    https://community.ui.com/releases/UAP-USW-Firmware-5-24-0-11950/74e3acca-9a22-4fa0-b76c-c654854638d4#comment/68e879e7-bdd4-4450-8ddd-0d3bfeed5fa4

                                    dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                      last edited by johnpoz

                                      Looks more like 516 mbps to me ;) Which is actually realistic.. At 60% of PHY.. not 70..

                                      5]   0.00-10.03  sec   618 MBytes   516 Mbits/sec
                                      

                                      Just tested off my phone to speedtest getting 437mbps down on 5.24 firmware on AC-Pro with iphone Xr.. Showing a 780 PHY.. Or 56% which is good..

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • M
                                        mcury @johnpoz
                                        last edited by

                                        @johnpoz True.. 516Mbits/s :)
                                        I'll stay on this 4.20 firmware for a while, it's working pretty well.
                                        In my scenario, with just one AP, the roaming events are working, no need to update to 5.24 at this time.

                                        dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • johnpozJ
                                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          Yeah I didn't really see anything in the firmware related to my devices - but I just like to be on whatever is the latest.. Helps me know if actually seeing what others say they see on the threads over on unifi when they post the latest updates..

                                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            mcury @johnpoz
                                            last edited by

                                            Yeah, the release notes for this 5.24 release got a lot for the new wifi 6 devices..
                                            I usually get the latest too.
                                            What I will try to do next time, in case that I can hold myself to not update ☺ Is to wait a little longer, to read the forum feedback. But I doubt that I'll be able to hold myself 😀

                                            dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.