Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Playing with fq_codel in 2.4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Traffic Shaping
    123
    1.1k
    1.2m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      sikita @daemonix
      last edited by

      @daemonix Hi, did you solve low number of matching data in floating rule of Codel?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        NinthWave @uptownVagrant
        last edited by

        @uptownvagrant
        When you made the post with the 100/100 connection, how did you come with the bandwidth values for IN and OUT ?

        I have tried your settings but the upload is now very bad.
        08477597-b665-48ff-a147-fae31ab3ca96-image.png

        Sometimes it even gets down to zero.

        Any idea ?

        B N 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bobbenheim @NinthWave
          last edited by

          @ninthwave What are your settings?

          N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            NinthWave @bobbenheim
            last edited by NinthWave

            @bobbenheim
            Exactly those but with a 100/30 connection
            https://forum.netgate.com/topic/112527/playing-with-fq_codel-in-2-4/815

            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              bobbenheim @NinthWave
              last edited by

              @ninthwave try ticking off ecn under limiter

              N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                NinthWave @bobbenheim
                last edited by

                @bobbenheim
                No result. Up speed keeps dying after a few seconds.
                Which screen capture can I add to help figure out ?

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bobbenheim @NinthWave
                  last edited by

                  @ninthwave Have you changed any other settings than applying fq-codel? You could try running TCP Optimizer if you are using windows.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Z
                    Zeny001 @Larrikin
                    last edited by

                    @larrikin said in Playing with fq_codel in 2.4:

                    For those who want to know how exactly I got it working, you can find the instructions here:

                    https://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/pfsense_traffic_shaping

                    A big thanks to @TheNarc for pointing me in this direction.

                    Also a big thanks to all the others who contributed to helping me troubleshoot. I am most grateful you took your own personal time to help me.

                    Thanks for this. I was running the dummynet version and after a few months I started to get my bandwidth fucked all the time... I figured something must have bugged out and did a fresh install and kept having the same issue.... Without dummynet and a ton of bufferbloat I was getting 990mbps download and 40 mbps upload.... My package from isp is 1gb/30mbps upload. Dummynet was giving me anywhere from 150mbps to 300mbps download and 0.1mbps upload.

                    I decided to go the wizard ALTQ version which is listed in your link and now I have A for bufferbloat and 980mbps download and 35 mbps upload. I'm satisfied with this thanks!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      NinthWave @NinthWave
                      last edited by

                      @ninthwave said in Playing with fq_codel in 2.4:

                      @uptownvagrant
                      When you made the post with the 100/100 connection, how did you come with the bandwidth values for IN and OUT ?

                      I have tried your settings but the upload is now very bad.
                      08477597-b665-48ff-a147-fae31ab3ca96-image.png

                      Sometimes it even gets down to zero.

                      Any idea ?

                      Maybe I should point out that I have a VOIP service which the vast majority of those having great result don't use.

                      Plus, I have enabled OpenVPN that I rarely use to check my IP cameras from my cell when I out. But from I have read, the OpenVPN service might be having an effect.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        andresmorago @uptownVagrant
                        last edited by andresmorago

                        @uptownvagrant said in Playing with fq_codel in 2.4:

                        WAN-Out FQ-CoDel queue

                        Hello to all
                        I have been trying to configure my limiters based on @uptownVagrant tutorial. Im having some issues with the upload speeds as the Bandwidth parameter under the FQ_CODEL_OUT doesnt seem to correctly work for me.
                        52711a59-3926-449a-aa4e-b68a5ccf494a-image.png

                        i have a 150/10 cable connection which, without traffic shaper provides the following speed results. they are according to what i pay for.

                        Server: Movistar - Barranquilla (id = 17577)
             ISP: Telmex Colombia S.A.
         Latency:    41.25 ms   (2.60 ms jitter)
        Download:   156.14 Mbps (data used: 152.1 MB)
          Upload:    11.07 Mbps (data used: 11.5 MB)
     Packet Loss:     0.0%

                        Setting the upload to 9 Mbits/s will completely block all uploads from my LAN clients. internet access is pretty much dead with this setup.

                          Server: Movistar - Barranquilla (id = 17577)
     ISP: Telmex Colombia S.A.
 Latency:    36.99 ms   (3.52 ms jitter)
Download:   140.77 Mbps (data used: 171.6 MB)
Upload:     FAILED
[error] Protocol error: Did not receive HELLO

                        so i decided to "illogically" increase the upload. test with 50 Mbits/s

                          Server: Movistar - Barranquilla (id = 17577)
     ISP: Telmex Colombia S.A.
 Latency:    43.55 ms   (4.42 ms jitter)
Download:   142.25 Mbps (data used: 193.6 MB)
  Upload:     4.07 Mbps (data used: 7.0 MB)
Packet Loss:     0.0%

                        i increased the upload parameter one more time. this time to 100 Mbit/s (which is 10x larger than my real upload speed)

                          Server: Movistar - Barranquilla (id = 17577)
     ISP: Telmex Colombia S.A.
 Latency:    42.05 ms   (3.65 ms jitter)
Download:   139.95 Mbps (data used: 189.6 MB)
  Upload:    10.10 Mbps (data used: 16.5 MB)
Packet Loss:     0.0%

                        is there anything im missing or omitting on my setup?
                        why does the upload parameter seem to divide the upload speed by 10?

                        Here are my parameters so far:

                        DOWNLOAD
                        f87b4e1b-d92c-4eda-8eca-3be45fe2f891-image.png


                        alt text

                        M P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          mind12 @andresmorago
                          last edited by

                          @andresmorago Seems like you have switched the limit and flows parameter values.
                          Limit should be 10240 and flows 20480

                          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R
                            Ricardox @mind12
                            last edited by

                            @mind12 For me so it works perfectlyImagem-5.png Imagem-4.png Imagem-3.png Imagem-2.png Imagem-1.jpg

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              mind12 @Ricardox
                              last edited by

                              @ricardox You also have 10240 configured for the limiter not 20480.

                              Can you achieve your max speed with such a low queue lengths?
                              I lost about 15Mbit/s from my 150Mbit download even with a 10K queue length.

                              Why is the gateway empty for the In queue fw rule? I thought it's a must.
                              And what's that 100 Weight for in the child queue? Never saw that elsewhere.

                              Thx

                              Z R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Z
                                zwck @mind12
                                last edited by

                                @mind12 is there a general rule of thumb how to choose target interval quantum limit and flow ?

                                M R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  mind12 @zwck
                                  last edited by

                                  @zwck
                                  Idk, I have just used the same working config as others here from this post: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/112527/playing-with-fq_codel-in-2-4/815

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • P
                                    Pentangle @andresmorago
                                    last edited by

                                    @andresmorago Check out your floating firewall rules in/out pipes - are they switched?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      Ricardox @mind12
                                      last edited by

                                      @mind12 For my 200/100 MB network I have no loss of speed. X86 PC

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • R
                                        Ricardox @zwck
                                        last edited by

                                        @zwck I believe not, change the values and test, for my network these values work well.

                                        Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Z
                                          zwck @Ricardox
                                          last edited by

                                          @ricardox whats your advertised line speed?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • KOMK
                                            KOM
                                            last edited by

                                            This post is deleted!
                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post