Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    108 Posts 39 Posters 35.8k Views 33 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      Patch @MoonKnight
      last edited by

      @ciscox said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

      Maybe it's time to report it. Make an bug-rapport. Can someone please add it on the bugtracker.

      Has been done and apparently a fix is close https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11805

      Also I find TLA distract from readability so in case anyone cares CAM manual page and a thread on common causes of errors

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • BismarckB Offline
        Bismarck @miken58b
        last edited by Bismarck

        @miken58b That makes totally sense in my case. My pfSense hardware is BIOS/MBR, but the update converted it somehow to UEFI/GPT, thus leaving me with a unbootable system and just a fresh install fixed it.

        Looks like the pfSense CE version needs a bit more attention... 🔷 🙌 🚀 🌔 🐒

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • P Offline
          pfnow
          last edited by

          Successfully updated a VM (ESXi 6.7u3) and a physical pfSense CE from 2.5.0 to 2.5.1. No issues to report.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            SteveITS Rebel Alliance @Waqar.UK
            last edited by

            @waqar-uk said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

            want to know if my untouched firmware ver 2.4.5 can be used to the latest package 2.5.1

            You will need to format the drive before installing an old version so it does not matter what is installed now.

            Packages will need to be installed again, but be sure to set pfSense to "previous stable version" per my signature before installing packages. Attempting to install packages for 2.5 on 2.4.5 will likely break things.

            Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
            When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, and device or disk speed.
            Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

            W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • QinnQ Offline
              Qinn @miken58b
              last edited by

              @miken58b If you format it ZFS you can take a snapshot and in split second you would have been back into the same state as the snapshot was created, on 2.4.5-p1

              Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
              Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
              Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W Offline
                Waqar.UK @SteveITS
                last edited by

                @steveits

                OK. Thanks. Shame really as I have firmware versions for 2.45 just saved after installing pfsense.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • bingo600B Offline
                  bingo600
                  last edited by

                  Arrghhhh ..... 😧

                  You guyzz just cost me 2 new Samsung EVO 870 - 256GB disks for my two home pfsense(s)

                  I gotta try that ZFS snapshot feature.

                  And if i have to install 2.5.1 soon , i can just do it from scratch w. ZFS 😊

                  /Bingo

                  If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                  pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                  QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                  CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                  LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                  chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • chudakC Offline
                    chudak @bingo600
                    last edited by

                    @bingo600 said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                    Arrghhhh ..... 😧

                    You guyzz just cost me 2 new Samsung EVO 870 - 256GB disks for my two home pfsense(s)

                    I gotta try that ZFS snapshot feature.

                    And if i have to install 2.5.1 soon , i can just do it from scratch w. ZFS 😊

                    /Bingo

                    So I guess the steps would be:

                    fresh pfSense 2.x.x install
                    make sure zfs selected
                    restore pfSense back up

                    and then what? how do you create and restore zfs snapshots of pfSense?

                    bingo600B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • bingo600B Offline
                      bingo600 @chudak
                      last edited by

                      @chudak

                      I hope like this

                      https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?zfs

                      https://danielisz.wordpress.com/2018/04/14/zfs-snapshot-on-freebsd/
                      https://danielisz.wordpress.com/2018/04/20/zfs-snapshot-on-freebsd-part-2/

                      https://www.maketecheasier.com/use-zfs-snapshots-clones/

                      /Bingo

                      If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                      pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                      QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                      CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                      LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                      chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • chudakC Offline
                        chudak @bingo600
                        last edited by

                        @bingo600 said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                        @chudak

                        I hope like this

                        https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?zfs

                        https://danielisz.wordpress.com/2018/04/14/zfs-snapshot-on-freebsd/
                        https://danielisz.wordpress.com/2018/04/20/zfs-snapshot-on-freebsd-part-2/

                        https://www.maketecheasier.com/use-zfs-snapshots-clones/

                        /Bingo

                        Thanks for the info !

                        Side note: you know every time I need to do anything with zfs I read very long complex explanations. Given that I am clueless about zfs, of cause... But should it be an easy, something like: run "blah-blah back-up" and then "blah-blah restore" ?! ( mumbling aloud :) )

                        bingo600B QinnQ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B Offline
                          bartkowski
                          last edited by

                          I upgraded my SG-2440 without any issues (I disabled pfBlockerNG before).
                          I initiated the upgrade from GUI and then went to the store, came back, and it was done. Smooth.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • AstraeaA Offline
                            Astraea
                            last edited by

                            Well I tried the new 2.5.1 update and had to roll back again to 2.4.5-p1 as Open VPN clients to my VPN service would not connect and also my multi-WAN setup would not allow for the port forwards to work. I have read there are issues with both OpenVPN and with Multi-WAN setups since the release of 2.5

                            Trying to get onto 2.5 since its release but have to keep rolling back, my next move it to try a clean install at a later date but for now, I will have to stay on the older version

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • bingo600B Offline
                              bingo600 @chudak
                              last edited by

                              @chudak
                              The only thing that gave me an issue w. ZFS on 2.4.5 , was that it "barfed" during install. That no disk was selcted.
                              Easy solved , just select the disk in the menu , before clikking proceed.

                              /Bingo

                              If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                              pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                              QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                              CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                              LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                              chpalmerC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • chpalmerC Offline
                                chpalmer @bingo600
                                last edited by

                                I had to add one of my interfaces back to my LAGG used for my WAN.

                                I had to go to each openVPN server config page and simply hit "save" to get my VPN's back up. I did not have to do this to any of the remote sites on the other end of the VPN's

                                Otherwise up and working.

                                Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                                Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • QinnQ Offline
                                  Qinn @chudak
                                  last edited by Qinn

                                  @chudak It's rather easy, first you create the snapshots. In the beginning snapshot are 0MB. They will grow with every change. Then upgrade to let's say 2.5.0 and after the upgrade they will have "kinda" the size of a complete pfSense installation, as everything has changed due to the upgrade and the snapshot "saves" all the changes. When you rollback (that's how a restore is called) all is back as to the moment the snapshots were created.

                                  Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                                  Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                                  Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                                  chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • chudakC Offline
                                    chudak @Qinn
                                    last edited by

                                    @qinn said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                                    @chudak It's rather easy, first you create the snapshots. In the beginning snapshot are 0MB. They will grow with every change. Then upgrade to let's say 2.5.0 and after the upgrade they will have "kinda" the size of a complete pfSense installation, as everything has changed due to the upgrade and the snapshot "saves" all the changes. When you rollback (that's how a restore is called) all is back as to the moment the snapshots were created.

                                    Sounds good !
                                    I've started a small VM to test and installed 2.5.1 on zfs

                                    933cf5ea-fb8f-4150-ac84-0354358f661b-image.png

                                    Do you know command lines how to test it ?

                                    QinnQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • AKEGECA Offline
                                      AKEGEC
                                      last edited by

                                      I just want to warn people about downgrade to previous pfsense versions with current configuration settings, After you downgrade and restored using current backup configuration, make sure you check every settings. Some security Encryption settings could be changed to lowest security e.g. 512 bits to 256 or 128 bits.

                                      I feel really sorry for users that experienced problems. 😢 😢 😢

                                      bingo600B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • bingo600B Offline
                                        bingo600 @AKEGEC
                                        last edited by

                                        @akegec said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                                        I just want to warn people about downgrade to previous pfsense versions with current configuration settings, After you downgrade and restored using current backup configuration, make sure you check every settings. Some security Encryption settings could be changed to lowest security e.g. 512 bits to 256 or 128 bits.

                                        I feel really sorry for users that experienced problems. 😢 😢 😢

                                        Nice "warning"

                                        To me it seems like you are referring to OpenVPN encryptopn settings or ???

                                        And i suppose you are talking about restoring a config made on a 2.5.x system , onto a "clean" 2.4.5 ??

                                        That post needs further explanation , please elaborate a bit.

                                        /Bingo

                                        If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                                        pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                                        QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                                        CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                                        LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • QinnQ Offline
                                          Qinn @chudak
                                          last edited by

                                          @chudak Good idea use a VM and take a look at

                                          https://forum.netgate.com/topic/95148/pc-engines-apu2-experiences/577

                                          Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                                          Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                                          Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                                          chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • chudakC Offline
                                            chudak @Qinn
                                            last edited by

                                            @qinn said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                                            @chudak Good idea use a VM and take a look at

                                            https://forum.netgate.com/topic/95148/pc-engines-apu2-experiences/577

                                            Very useful, thx !

                                            I tried a dry-run, commands worked, but it was not real as my VM is not fully setup as a router. But in general it seem like a worthwhile exercise to consider switch to zfs.

                                            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.