Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    NTP - poor reach after 20 hours

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    51 Posts 5 Posters 12.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      farmerjohn @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz
      i updated from 2.5.0 to 2.5.1. Here is NTP status after 90 minutes after reboot. Hopefully the Scandinavian guys won't try and shame me again with their impressive NTP output.

      [2.5.1-RELEASE][admin@pfsense.home]/var/log: ntpq -pcrv
           remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
      ==============================================================================
       0.pfsense.pool. .POOL.          16 p    -   64    0    0.000   +0.000   0.000
      +unifi.versadns. 71.66.197.233    2 u  632  128  120   42.354   -2.973   1.580
      *clock.nyc.he.ne .CDMA.           1 u  453  128  144   37.191   +1.439   1.048
      
      associd=0 status=0618 leap_none, sync_ntp, 1 event, no_sys_peer,
      version="ntpd 4.2.8p15@1.3728-o Fri Feb  5 22:07:56 UTC 2021 (1)",
      processor="amd64", system="FreeBSD/12.2-STABLE", leap=00, stratum=2,
      precision=-21, rootdelay=37.191, rootdisp=476.256, refid=209.51.161.238,
      reftime=e4233dba.ae57b7eb  Thu, Apr 15 2021 18:33:30.681,
      clock=e42344a7.e24f1d1b  Thu, Apr 15 2021 19:03:03.884, peer=60391, tc=7,
      mintc=3, offset=+1.048514, frequency=+38.158, sys_jitter=4.679301,
      clk_jitter=1.975, clk_wander=0.060
      
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Cool_CoronaC
        Cool_Corona
        last edited by

        995c544e-9933-4faa-90f7-6f117b7b47fa-billede.png

        5e148297-707c-412c-aca4-3e432d73eb3f-billede.png

        A couple of the connections we have.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Cool_CoronaC
          Cool_Corona
          last edited by

          Try changing pools

          3fd39a38-d3fd-4e95-89b2-cfbac1d646b7-billede.png

          Changed mine from dk, se, no to 0,1,2,3.europe.pool.ntp.org

          It bettered the jitter quite considerably.

          F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F
            farmerjohn @Cool_Corona
            last edited by

            @cool_corona
            I'll try going back to multiple pool servers (.us.pool.ntp.org) - hopefully that will improve my current situation (status after 19 hours):

            [2.5.1-RELEASE][admin@pfsense.home]/var/log: ntpq -pcrv
                 remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
            ==============================================================================
             0.pfsense.pool. .POOL.          16 p    -   64    0    0.000   +0.000   0.000
            +tock.sol.net    206.55.64.77     3 u  41m  512   20   37.120   +1.937   1.621
            -4.53.160.75 (ns 75.76.123.222    3 u 1722  512   70   26.891   +3.313   1.226
            *frigg.fancube.c 107.46.198.112   2 u 1581  512   44   43.347   +3.275   2.363
            
            associd=0 status=0618 leap_none, sync_ntp, 1 event, no_sys_peer,
            version="ntpd 4.2.8p15@1.3728-o Fri Feb  5 22:07:56 UTC 2021 (1)",
            processor="amd64", system="FreeBSD/12.2-STABLE", leap=00, stratum=3,
            precision=-21, rootdelay=49.680, rootdisp=77.172, refid=154.16.245.246,
            reftime=e4240ee1.afd0e2c4  Fri, Apr 16 2021  9:25:53.686,
            clock=e424150e.f3e02c84  Fri, Apr 16 2021  9:52:14.952, peer=60404, tc=9,
            mintc=3, offset=+1.958787, frequency=+37.805, sys_jitter=1.230244,
            clk_jitter=3.129, clk_wander=0.225
            
            
            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @farmerjohn
              last edited by

              Make sure your logging your ntp, in the ntp settings.

              And look for if ntp is seeing a spike and or resetting for other reasons. Your reaches should be 377, or maybe 1 packet missed now and then, or even a couple..

              Those are horrible reach values.. And to be honest, the numbers don't even seem right.. Unless ntp is restarting or you missing a lot of packets..

              You shouldn't see numbers like that, unless ntp has reset/restarted and is just starting... Or your loosing a lot of packets in a row..

              20 for example, means that you have just restarted and you got 1 packet out of the last 5

              10000 = 20 octal

              So you have missed the last 4 packets after you got one, and before that you didn't have any.. Or 3 before that was missed 00010000

              You really should never see a 20 as it starts up, because it wouldn't count up like that if your getting responses..

              Your counts should be
              1 = 1
              11 = 3
              111 = 7
              1111 = 17
              11111 = 37
              111111 = 77
              1111111 = 177
              11111111 = 377

              Your reach values are pointing to a lot of unanswered queries..

              your 44 value for example would be this for the last 8 packets..

              00100100

              So your only getting 1 out of every 3 queries?

              70 = 00111000

              So you got 3 in a row, and then last 3 nothing..

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • F
                farmerjohn @johnpoz
                last edited by farmerjohn

                @johnpoz
                I enabled the two logging options. here are the last 15 - not sure if 'unreachable' lines are a concern or normal.

                [2.5.1-RELEASE][admin@pfsense.home]/var/log: cat ntpd.log | tail -15
                Apr 16 11:45:37 pfsense ntpd[76193]: Soliciting pool server 142.147.92.5
                Apr 16 11:45:41 pfsense ntpd[76193]: 69.89.207.99 101a 8a sys_peer
                Apr 16 11:45:41 pfsense ntpd[76193]: 45.79.51.42 0014 84 reachable
                Apr 16 11:46:44 pfsense ntpd[76193]: Soliciting pool server 209.50.63.74
                Apr 16 11:47:52 pfsense ntpd[76193]: Soliciting pool server 142.147.92.5
                Apr 16 11:49:02 pfsense ntpd[76193]: Soliciting pool server 75.76.123.222
                Apr 16 11:49:02 pfsense ntpd[76193]: 75.76.123.222 0011 81 mobilize assoc 33714
                Apr 16 11:49:03 pfsense ntpd[76193]: Soliciting pool server 184.105.182.7
                Apr 16 11:49:03 pfsense ntpd[76193]: 75.76.123.222 0014 84 reachable
                Apr 16 11:50:12 pfsense ntpd[76193]: Soliciting pool server 172.86.181.78
                Apr 16 11:51:18 pfsense ntpd[76193]: Soliciting pool server 72.14.181.128
                Apr 16 11:52:25 pfsense ntpd[76193]: Soliciting pool server 213.32.40.221
                Apr 16 11:52:38 pfsense ntpd[76193]: 216.177.181.129 0014 84 reachable
                Apr 16 11:54:29 pfsense ntpd[76193]: 69.89.207.99 0613 83 unreachable
                Apr 16 11:55:52 pfsense ntpd[76193]: 45.79.51.42 0013 83 unreachable
                
                
                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @farmerjohn
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  your prob going to want to look at more than the last 15 entries..

                  But unreachable isn't good no..

                  You can tell from your reach numbers your having a real hard time getting responses from the ntp your trying to talk too..

                  Those numbers your showing for reach values are not indicative of good connectivity.. Take your numbers and convert the octal number to a 8 digit binary and you can see response or no response for the last 8 you have sent.. To that specific IP.. When you are seeing the numbers you are seeing.. You have hard time talking to those ntp servers.. Be it they are not getting your query, or they are not just answering.. But those reach numbers are not good for keeping good time..

                  edit:
                  Maybe vs using pool, try some specific one that are in your geographic area
                  https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Servers/StratumOneTimeServers
                  https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Servers/StratumTwoTimeServers

                  There are plenty of ntp you can specific point to on the net.. You normally want something close as possible to you, to min the delay. But you for sure need something you can reliably talk too..

                  Add say time.cloudflare.com

                  They have like 180+ locations via anycast.. You should be able to hopefully talk to something reliable via that..
                  https://developers.cloudflare.com/time-services/ntp/usage

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F
                    farmerjohn
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz
                    Changed to 5 individual servers closest to me. Here is status after 20 minutes:

                    [2.5.1-RELEASE][admin@pfsense.home]/var/log: ntpq -p
                         remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
                    ==============================================================================
                     time.cloudflare .INIT.          16 u    -  512    0    0.000   +0.000   0.000
                     rolex.netservic .INIT.          16 u    -  512    0    0.000   +0.000   0.000
                     rb.steadfastdns 208.100.0.253    2 u  176   64   74   18.244   +0.095   1.642
                     time.skylineser .INIT.          16 u    -  512    0    0.000   +0.000   0.000
                    *ntp.your.org    204.9.51.33      2 u  701   64    0   20.320   +0.466   0.460
                    
                    
                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @farmerjohn
                      last edited by johnpoz

                      Those are not working ;)

                      Your isp blocking ntp?

                      The only one your talking to at all with a reach of 74?

                      so 00111100..

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      F 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F
                        farmerjohn @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz
                        how can i determine if isp is blocking ntp? There is some 123 traffic on WAN interface getting blocked - not sure if due to isp.

                        I tried to upload image to make things easier for you to troubleshoot, but received notification "something went wrong while parsing server response netgate"

                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • F
                          farmerjohn @johnpoz
                          last edited by

                          @johnpoz
                          upload works on diffeerent browser (firefox-yes, brave no-go)
                          pfsense-ntp-wan-01.png

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @farmerjohn
                            last edited by johnpoz

                            @farmerjohn said in NTP - poor reach after 20 hours:

                            There is some 123 traffic on WAN interface getting blocked - not sure if due to isp.

                            Yeah doesn't sound good.. If that was your return answer from your ntp query..

                            As to tell if its an isp/internet issue - would sniff on your wan, you would see your ntp queries go out - but never get a response in your sniff. As to that being your isp blocking, or just getting lost in the internet, or the place your trying to talk not answering you - that is the question..

                            Do you have a vps or something you can fire up, and run ntp server on it - and see if you can talk to that?

                            If you get a glitch trying to post an image, try again in a few minutes. In the past I have had issues posting images, but try again in few minutes and normally works.

                            Are you noticing any other issues with your internet connection. Are your states resetting? If your states reset, then yeah return of a ntp query would be blocked because there is no state to allow the traffic back in. Yeah udp is not stateful ;) But pf keeps track of it via a state entry..

                            edit: Are any of those IPs of NTP servers your trying to talk too?

                            Doesn't look like it because the source port is not 123.. Looks like they are asking you for ntp.. Do you have your IP listed in the ntp pool or something?

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            bingo600B F 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • bingo600B
                              bingo600 @johnpoz
                              last edited by

                              @johnpoz

                              Just looked up the 123.170.x.x's
                              I doubt they are NTP ansvers šŸ‘¼

                              7dd9e80e-9c48-4bbb-9fd2-2e154c2b8b13-image.png

                              Seems like CN "probes"

                              /Bingo

                              If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                              pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                              QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                              CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                              LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • johnpozJ
                                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @bingo600
                                last edited by

                                Yeah if it was him asking the source port would be different... That seems to be quite a few probes ;) Maybe that is causing him some grief in trying to get ntp working?

                                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @johnpoz
                                  last edited by

                                  @farmerjohn I think @bingo600 is going to reach out to you via PM with a ntp server you can point too.

                                  I could also have you point directly to my IP, my local ntp server is part of the pool.. This way if know your IP can sniff to see if the queries are even getting to me, etc.

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • F
                                    farmerjohn @johnpoz
                                    last edited by

                                    @johnpoz

                                    Do you have a vps or something you can fire up, and run ntp server on it - and see if you can talk to that?

                                    unfortunately no - only on my LAN, but that probably doesn't count.

                                    Do you have your IP listed in the ntp pool or something?

                                    no, just china and some other unknowns hitting me via 123

                                    Are you noticing any other issues with your internet connection.

                                    One thing I've done recently is enable fq_codel and under general settings / advanced / Firewall & NAT, lowered "TCP Established" to 86400 and "Firewall Optimization" from conservative to normal.

                                    Also setup openvpn on OPT1 and getting a lot of blocked 853 traffic in log, but have not noticed any connectivity issues browsing on openvpn clients.
                                    pfsense-resolver-853-b.png

                                    AKEGECA johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • AKEGECA
                                      AKEGEC @farmerjohn
                                      last edited by

                                      @farmerjohn smart move to use Quad9 DNS, it blocks a lot malicious sites.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • johnpozJ
                                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @farmerjohn
                                        last edited by johnpoz

                                        Those are all out of state blocks.. see the R and Fs those are RST and FIN packets.. Those are what close a session. If the session has already been closed then those would be blocked. etc..

                                        But why are you seeing them on opt1? And your hiding what I assume is your public IP that ends in .37 there? Why would that traffic be inbound to opt1? Is that .37 IP your hiding a rfc1918 address on your internal network?

                                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                        F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • F
                                          farmerjohn @johnpoz
                                          last edited by

                                          @johnpoz

                                          ip that ends in .37 is my public IP.

                                          Why would that traffic be inbound to opt1?

                                          i wish i could answer that.

                                          here is a short sample of tcpdump, I'm terrible at interpreting this, but posted here in case something obvious.

                                          17:45:02.408011 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 43242, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                                              my.public.ip.037.res.spectrum.com.62388 > time-a-b.nist.gov.ntp: [udp sum ok] NTPv4, length 48
                                          	Client, Leap indicator:  (0), Stratum 0 (unspecified), poll 0 (1s), precision 0
                                          	Root Delay: 0.000000, Root dispersion: 0.000000, Reference-ID: (unspec)
                                          	  Reference Timestamp:  0.000000000
                                          	  Originator Timestamp: 0.000000000
                                          	  Receive Timestamp:    0.000000000
                                          	  Transmit Timestamp:   0.000000000
                                          	    Originator - Receive Timestamp:  0.000000000
                                          	    Originator - Transmit Timestamp: 0.000000000
                                          17:45:02.449490 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 48, id 27186, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                                              time-a-b.nist.gov.ntp > my.public.ip.037.res.spectrum.com.62388: [udp sum ok] NTPv3, length 48
                                          	Server, Leap indicator:  (0), Stratum 1 (primary reference), poll 13 (8192s), precision -29
                                          	Root Delay: 0.000244, Root dispersion: 0.000488, Reference-ID: NIST
                                          	  Reference Timestamp:  3827598208.000000000 (2021/04/16 17:43:28)
                                          	  Originator Timestamp: 0.000000000
                                          	  Receive Timestamp:    3827598302.430281727 (2021/04/16 17:45:02)
                                          	  Transmit Timestamp:   3827598302.430282955 (2021/04/16 17:45:02)
                                          	    Originator - Receive Timestamp:  3827598302.430281727 (2021/04/16 17:45:02)
                                          	    Originator - Transmit Timestamp: 3827598302.430282955 (2021/04/16 17:45:02)
                                          
                                          
                                          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • johnpozJ
                                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @farmerjohn
                                            last edited by johnpoz

                                            @farmerjohn said in NTP - poor reach after 20 hours:

                                            i wish i could answer that.

                                            OPT1 is what interface? And why would the source of the traffic "into" opt1 be your public IP? That makes ZERO sense..

                                            How would you be seeing inbound traffic into a lan side interface with your public IP On it???

                                            I don't even see how that would be possible???

                                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.