Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PFsense CE 2.5.1 NAT broken on interface != default WAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    pfsense 2.5natbug2.5.1wan
    56 Posts 23 Posters 19.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      vajonam Rebel Alliance @finnschi
      last edited by

      Think this was the fix.

      https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/commit/cf7fd16ddcc36499c6dae90074335e889dc9e484

      infosamu.itI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • infosamu.itI
        infosamu.it @vajonam
        last edited by

        @vajonam can you explain how to solve the issue?

        S V 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          slu @infosamu.it
          last edited by

          @infosamu-it
          since the kernel must be rebuild, no chance to fix this with the patch package.
          We also wait for a new pfSense release since we have issues with this bug.

          pfSense Gold subscription

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V
            vajonam Rebel Alliance @infosamu.it
            last edited by vajonam

            @infosamu-it since netgate hasn't released the build tools, not much we can do but wait for the next release AFAIK. 2.6.0 is an option but there are a few issues with that I know of

            kernel panics #11839
            counters 0/0 #11775
            Also rate limiting seems broken as per another user. maybe related to #11775.

            pfsense fun!

            V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              shpokas
              last edited by

              Any timeframe we can expect a fix to be released?
              Neither downgrade nor development version seems a great choice.

              V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                vajonam Rebel Alliance @shpokas
                last edited by

                I am also just a user who shares your pain, stuck on 2.5.1, any guesses will just be speculation at at this time.

                joao mariaJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • joao mariaJ
                  joao maria @vajonam
                  last edited by

                  @vajonam

                  tambem tive esse problema, resolvi assim
                  5fd539d0-1a09-4317-ae52-cbb60f30ed2b-image.png desabilito - starto o serviço depois desmarco e funcionou.

                  João Oliveira

                  V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    vajonam Rebel Alliance @joao maria
                    last edited by

                    @joao-maria Hmm.. not sure I wan to disable firewall :-)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V
                      vajonam Rebel Alliance @vajonam
                      last edited by vajonam

                      @vajonam This is not true netgate has released the right build tools. together with another user I was able build the new kernel and install and can confirm it fixes the problem. so we have to hurry up and wait for a p1 or some such release officially.

                      For others interested.
                      https://github.com/Augustin-FL/building-pfsense-iso-from-source

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • S
                        slu @vajonam
                        last edited by

                        @vajonam
                        thank you for this really detailed documentation!

                        Maybe you can help Netgate to build -p1? 😉

                        pfSense Gold subscription

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • N
                          neo666
                          last edited by

                          After many months with 2.4.5 I finally decided to upgrade to 2.5.1 last weekend and now I'm really upset about not having read the release notes and seen this topic before.

                          Fortunately, I had few NAT rules on the secondary links and I managed to resolve it relatively quickly, but I will have to hope that my main link does not stop.

                          I am miles away from the server (which is physical), rollback to the previous version is unthinkable at the moment.

                          E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • E
                            encyklopedi @neo666
                            last edited by

                            @neo666 I have just updated my pfsense today to 2.6.0-devel and that solved the problem. And as you i am also upset that netgate can let this bug happen and not make an quick patch for 2.5.1. An other question i have is why is not the plus version of pfsense effected. Now i am forced to run devel version in production.

                            V S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • V
                              vjizzle @encyklopedi
                              last edited by vjizzle

                              @encyklopedi The plus version is paid and despite Netgate saying they will treat pfsense CE the same as the Plus version, pfsense CE is on the slow-track. Bug is fixed in the Plus version within days, the CE version just a pet project. And nobody give me bs that it is fixed in 2.6 so CE is not going to be left behind! 2.6 and the CE version is just a big testing ground for Netgate so they can keep Plus version stable a reliable for paying customers. Why don’t they just admit it, would clear up a lot of confusion and people would be able to make a strategic choice if to continue with Netgate product or what version to choose.

                              E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                encyklopedi @vjizzle
                                last edited by

                                @vjizzle I don't have a problem if that the case. But then should Netgate be open with that. So if people/corporations feel the need for quick support they know that they need to be on the plus-version and not on CE-version.

                                V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • V
                                  vjizzle @encyklopedi
                                  last edited by vjizzle

                                  @encyklopedi Exactly my point. Put your big-boy pants on and just come clean and do it quick.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • S
                                    shpokas @encyklopedi
                                    last edited by

                                    @encyklopedi

                                    Where does that leave the pfSense CE releases? This is a burning question for our users, and for good reason. ... We’re already planning a pfSense CE 2.6 release in mid-2021.

                                    So as I start to realize now, they won't do any bug fixes anymore. Screw you guys.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • S
                                      slu @shpokas
                                      last edited by slu

                                      I can not understand why this problem is not in the know issues list, people still run into this known issue...

                                      pfSense Gold subscription

                                      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • N
                                        neo666 @slu
                                        last edited by

                                        @slu

                                        @slu said in PFsense CE 2.5.1 NAT broken on interface != default WAN:

                                        I can not understand why this problem is not in the know issues list, people still run into this known issue...

                                        https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/21-02-2_2-5-1.html

                                        It is in the release notes (link above), unfortunately I only found it when I was already facing the problem and after analyzing all my infrastructure because days before the firmware upgrade I had exchanged one of my gateways equipment and I thought it could be it.

                                        In my opinion the right thing would be to remove the download file as soon as the problem has been reported, since a solution apparently will not be quick.

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          slu @neo666
                                          last edited by

                                          @neo666 said in PFsense CE 2.5.1 NAT broken on interface != default WAN:

                                          It is in the release notes (link above), unfortunately I only found it when I was already facing the problem and after analyzing all my infrastructure because days before the firmware upgrade I had exchanged one of my gateways equipment and I thought it could be it.

                                          Ok, the known issue list is grow up now since i look the last time.

                                          pfSense Gold subscription

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • J
                                            jim82
                                            last edited by

                                            Any solution to this problem?

                                            From what I can figure out, Plus version is fixed, but I can't run that on my own hardware, so it's a dead end.

                                            CE version seems abandoned in terms of fixing issues. This has been an issue for a long time now.

                                            I've always been happy with the support and features of pfSense, but I guess it's time to move on :-(

                                            Best regards
                                            Jim

                                            Still learning, correct me if I'm wrong please.

                                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.