Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Tags
    3. virtualmachine
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • E

      Recommended Snort rules to change from "Alert" to "Block"?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IDS/IPS snort pfsense 2.7.2 virtualmachine
      12
      0 Votes
      12 Posts
      2k Views
      E

      @bmeeks said in Recommended Snort rules to change from "Alert" to "Block"?:

      @Enso_ said in Recommended Snort rules to change from "Alert" to "Block"?:

      Looks like you are right once again. It was set to 'remove blocked host after 1 hour'. So I just never caught it in time.

      I recommend leaving that setting alone, too. You generally don't want blocks hanging around forever. Not only do they consume resources, but if the block was due to a false positive you would like it to automatically clear in a reasonable time without requiring admin action.

      If Snort blocked the traffic the first time, it will block it a subsequent time later on (if the blocked host is automatically periodically cleared).

      One issue with Legacy Blocking Mode is that it is a big hammer. It blocks ALL traffic to a blocked IP for ALL internal hosts.

      Inline IPS Mode, if you can use it (your NICs must support netmap natively), drops individual packets instead of blocking everything to/from the IP. That's much more granular. But with Inline IPS Mode, you must explicitly change rules you want to block traffic from ALERT to DROP using the features on the SID MGMT tab.

      I'm leaving the setting to remove the blocked host after 1h.

      As for inline mode; that is something I want to circle back to in the future. However, currently there are no resources that could configure inline mode in a timely fashion. Plus, I'm quite sure I'd have to upgrade the NICs to support netmap.

    • N

      Local DNS not working in VM over bridge

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS dns virtualmachine bhyve
      1
      0 Votes
      1 Posts
      496 Views
      No one has replied
    • Cr4z33C

      pfSense newbie: can it run in a VM and handle a 10Gb/s ISP line?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions newbie virtualmachine 10gbase-t
      35
      0 Votes
      35 Posts
      6k Views
      Cool_CoronaC

      @ljgriz Note that SATA runs out of juice at 6gbps......

      So if you run SATA drives, then it wont go higher.

    • B

      PfSense Hetzner Dedicated Proxmox

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Deutsch proxmox hetzner virtualip virtualmachine
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      1k Views
      JeGrJ

      @benjaminbeckcsl said in PfSense Hetzner Dedicated Proxmox:

      Nun habe ich eine dritte IP. welche die 66.77.88.3 ist. Wie bekomme ich die da auch noch drauf? Dadurch dass das GW von Hetzner bsp. 66.77.88.14 ist kann ich kein 32er Netz nehmen.

      Was hat da genau das Gateway mit zu tun? So wie du das zeigst sind alle 3 IPs aus dem gleichen Netz? Dann haben die doch keine unterschiedlichen Gateways?

      Ansonsten was @viragomann sagt, wenn die alle aus dem gleichen Subnetz sind, dann wird die Subnetzmaske des Netzes genommen, nicht /32. Ansonsten IP Alias und let's go. :)