Building a Stratum 1 NTP Server Using Raspberry Pi
-
@johnpoz
i don't use shm anyway this is the difference i see between the 2 gps
i restarted the ublox service around 13:00, where you see the spike
adafruit
green is pps+gps
ublox
yellow is pps green is gps -
That is same same pi make and model. Same setup just the difference in the hats?
Wow - something seems off there.. I can see why your interested now..
What specific pi? And what specific hat? Maybe I will order one ;)
-
@johnpoz
yes both are raspberry pi 4 with 4gb same debian but different hat -
What are you using to graph that like that? I would be up for getting a pi4 and the same hat to test.. Always up for fun projects ;)
Trying to find an excuse to get a 4 ;) hehehe
You seem to be pretty for out on the same hat I have, your ublox
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ======================================================================================================= *SHM(1) .PPS. 0 l 2 16 377 0.0000 -0.3426 0.0026Is the hat you got.. You had to solder?
https://www.adafruit.com/product/2324 -
@johnpoz
that is telegraf sending to grafana
grafana sitting on another raspberry ..
https://www.adafruit.com/product/2324
https://www.waveshare.com/max-m8q-gnss-hat.htmadafruit need soldering this but it's easy
-
Are those values actually in milliseconds or is it microseconds and just mislabeled?
Steve
-
@stephenw10
the values from ntpq afaik is milliseconds ? -
Yes, it reads in milliseconds but that can get confusing when is shows a value like 0.001 (1μs).
Values in microseconds are what you should expect if PPS is working.
Less than 1μs is impressive. I generally see between 1-2μs here.
Steve
-
@kiokoman said in Building a Stratum 1 NTP Server Using Raspberry Pi:
and it drift up and down very mutch during the day compare to the adafruit
Is your device thermally stable, without some kind of TCXO its likely drift. I see fluctuations around 11am to 4pm as the sun hits the room where my timing hardware is located. Temperature corrected devices are unaffected.
Also, different drivers are very likely to introduce different levels of performance so try and ensure you are using same drivers (type 22 PPS vs SHM type 28 etc).
-
yeah, i'm using only type 20 and type 22
but i think i was finally able to find a configuration that suits ithttp://www.philrandal.co.uk/blog/archives/04-01-2019_04-30-2019.html
with some minor adjustment
-
I'll answer your question about nohz
it does not work on raspberry pi 4 + raspbian
the kernel isn't configured to allows the nohz parameter to work
also, I found that you can only use
flag 3 0 (use the ntpd clock discipline)
and not
flag 3 1 (use the kernel discipline)
for PPS
if you try to use flag 3 1 you see in the syslog this:refclock_params: time_pps_kcbind: Operation not supportedthis is because the kernel is compiled without CONFIG_NTP_PPS
obviusly
as a good nerd I recompiled ...
this is ublox now
server 127.127.20.0 mode 89 iburst prefer minpoll 2 maxpoll 4 fudge 127.127.20.0 flag1 1 flag3 1 time1 0.0 time2 0.025 refid GPSpi@raspberrypi3:~/linux $ uname -a Linux raspberrypi3 4.19.118-v7lntp+ #1 SMP Fri Dec 11 14:42:08 CET 2020 armv7l GNU/Linuxpi@raspberrypi3:~/linux $ ntpq -crv -pn status=041d leap_none, sync_uhf_radio, 1 event, kern, version="ntpd ntpsec-1.1.3 2019-11-18T06:04:00Z", processor="armv7l", system=" Linux/4.19.118-v7lntp+", leap=00, stratum=1, precision=-20, rootdelay=0.0, rootdisp=2.18, refid=GPS, reftime=e37e600c.8bd6769d 2020-12-11T21:15:56.546Z, clock=e37e6018.d0a57250 2020-12-11T21:16:08.815Z, peer=11020, tc=4, mintc=0, offset=7.8e-05, frequency=-18.907623, sys_jitter=0.000277, clk_jitter=0.000728, clk_wander=0.001816, tai=37, leapsec="2017-01-01T00:00Z", expire="2021-06-28T00:00Z" remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ======================================================================================================= oNMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 12 16 377 0.0000 0.0001 0.0003
-
This post is deleted! -
Hi all -
Wanted to follow up on this thread as I recently acquired a Stratum 1 NTP server for my network (LeoNTP - very cool little device). Currently, I have it setup as the only NTP time server on pfSense (i.e. no other servers are configured). Is this an acceptable setup, or should I be adding a few additional public Stratum 1 servers as a sanity check, and set the LeoNTP device as the preferred server? I realize with just one server I don't have any redundancy, but is that the only main drawback? Thanks in advance!
-
@tman222
if I remember correctly you need at least 3 good ntp server on the list to see if the leontp is working correctly
without any reference you don't know if the time is correct -
@tman222 I run a few Pi based GPS devices that don't offer the same accuracy, and a few external sources for backup. The LeoNTP takes precedence as primary source of time due to its accuracy.
-
-
@tman222
this is my config for the ubloxserver 127.127.20.0 mode 89 iburst prefer minpoll 2 maxpoll 4 fudge 127.127.20.0 flag1 1 flag3 1 time1 0.0 time2 0.025 refid GPS tos mindist 0.060 server 192.168.10.200 server 151.3.106.211 server ntp1.inrim.it server ntp2.inrim.it pool 0.it.pool.ntp.org pool 1.it.pool.ntp.orgthis is the results
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ======================================================================================== oNMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 11 16 377 0.0000 0.0002 0.0003 +192.168.10.200 .GPS. 1 u 42 64 377 0.0996 -0.0002 0.0149 +151.3.106.211 .GPS. 1 u 40 64 377 24.2144 0.1478 0.9674 -193.204.114.232 .CTD. 1 u 59 64 377 25.2698 -4.7052 0.3729 +193.204.114.233 .CTD. 1 u 49 64 377 12.5229 0.0942 0.3967 0.it.pool.ntp.org .POOL. 16 p - 256 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 1.it.pool.ntp.org .POOL. 16 p - 256 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 -37.247.53.178 193.204.114.233 2 u 57 64 377 11.9465 1.0424 0.6543 -162.159.200.123 10.20.14.167 3 u 37 64 377 25.2151 0.8878 0.4707 +212.45.144.206 193.204.114.232 2 u 9 64 377 10.5258 0.5104 0.3046
