• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Problems with gateway of the rules.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
2 Posts 2 Posters 1.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L
    luiz.tomaz
    last edited by Aug 17, 2006, 3:04 PM

    Friends,

    They forgive my English, I made the text with a little translation tools of google and a little of what I already learned ;-)

    I have a PfSense here functioning as internal firewall.

    There are 3 interfaces:
    WAN - > is going for other internal nets of the company. (10.0.0.0/8)
    LAN - > is in the same net LAN: -) (10.14.6.0/24) 
    DMZ - > Net where they are the servers who take care of them you scheme of LAN and of the other net comings for the WAN. (10.14.5.0/24)

    Nat is disactivated, the objective is practically to make a roteador with filter.

    My problem is happening in interface WAN. To have access the other nets of the company, step for the roteador 10.14.1.8. but I have some server in the net 10.14.1.0 /24 that if I try to have access of my LAN or DMZ, I pass for the roteador 10.14.1.8 because of gateway of the rule. this is generating slowness and loss of packages.

    the question is:    How I make for the packages destined to the servers in the net of interface WAN are not launched to the roteador? (that he is gateway of interface WAN and default gw)

    I wait that it has been good to understand…

    TKS!

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • H
      hoba
      last edited by Aug 17, 2006, 3:44 PM

      I wonder how that setup works at all. Your WAN subnet includes the LAN and DMZ subnet. This can't work properly. You have to rearrange your subnets in a different way. At the moment you have conflicting subnets.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      2 out of 2
      • First post
        2/2
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
        consent.not_received