@periko said in Unofficial E2guardian package for pfSense: Hello marcelloc or other e2guardian users, does e2guardian is already support for pfsense 2.5.2? Regards!!! I've been using it on 2.5.2 for months now, no issues.

I know this is an old thread but for anyone attempting this in 2025 this might help. See the last post I made in this thread. https://forum.netgate.com/topic/197131/can-someone-help-me-with-the-bios-mod-on-really-old-hardware-watchguard-xtm-5

@robnitro That sounds really good.

@gersonalves obrigado pelo retorno, já verifiquei se há conflito de porta por algum outro serviço, mas não há, inclusive quando para a navegação eu sempre vejo o netstat -an | grep -i listen e sempre a porta *.8081(ssl) deixa de listar, a porta 8080 continua listando, daí eu salvo a conf do e2guardian em seguida a porta 8081 começa a listar novamente e a navegação volta a fluir normalmente. tcp4 0 0 *.8081 . LISTEN tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.8080 . LISTEN tcp4 0 0 192.168.0.254.8080 . LISTEN tcp6 0 0 *.53 . LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.53 . LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.10050 . LISTEN tcp6 0 0 *.80 . LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.80 . LISTEN tcp6 0 0 *.xxxx . LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.xxxx . LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.xxxx . LISTEN tcp6 0 0 *.xxxx . LISTEN Já verifiquei no firewall e nat e não há algum impedimento com as portas de escuta do e2guardian.

@winsonfa It should still work? Those errors are just cosmetic, you can ignore. On my machine, it gives that error but still works.

@dugeem It would be interesting to see how much PPPoE performance has improved with the new if_pppoe driver included in 2.8 CE and Plus 25.07. Previously with Netgraph/mpd5 it was limited to ~ 400 Mbps on the APU2.

Hi guys, I know this is a super old thread - but just wondering if anyone in here could share me the a copy of the last x32 bit via DD configured for the x700 - Please see here for the actual thread with the background as to why: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/133044/pfsense-image-for-firebox-x700

@stephenw10 i have strange fetish for this kind of devices,i'd like to get my hands on them,but still,i'll have to use some bigger pc-like or passive and keep those for tinker purposes... i didn't even installed windows 10/11 there yet..just for fun addon card eats about 2.5W idle unconnected.i'm now down to ~23.8W

If you change pFSense / Services / Squid Proxy Server / GEneral tab Then check the SSL Man In The Middle Filtering area and change the SSL/MITM Mode from Splice WhiteList, Bumb OtherWise to the Splice ALL the problem can be solve with a this shape. OR With a default value of the SSL/MITM Mode with Splice WhiteList, Bumb OtherWise you can goto ACLs atb and add desıred web site url to the WhiteList area ie: online.kktcmaliye.com

Hello Stephenw10 Thanks much for the message. I will check it, although the service can't start, not with that config. Anyway, I am also trying to use parallel port configuration since it doesnt' need any interface in between. (I have another display hd44780 compatible with no USB interface) Will post the results here after all. Thanks Fabricio.

@jasonsansone I haven't tested the new pf versions yet. Will be starting my migration project in the next few weeks. The details are fairly self explanatory I thought. Basically openssl disables certain weaker ciphers. The config file re-enables them for the wpa_supplicant session. Depending on which wpa_supplicant is in use, this is either done simply through the wpa_supplicant.conf file (example at the end of the file), or through a config file for openssl that's referenced in the command line launching wpa_supplicant. @dreamdenizen Mac for wpa_supplicant doesn't have to be that of RG, or even RG where certs came from. What matters is the mac in wpa_supplicant.conf file match that of the wan interface mac requesting dhcp. Otherwise, you'll get eapol authentication, but never received an IP because of the mismatch.

@shred yup, I've been there, I also got confuse about that. but that rule is to block other interface to access management port. some of the link or pictures of this guide did not retrieve when netgate upgrade their forum. [image: 1565052185679-02268e4d-4c47-4b6c-b5ed-0cdbe7ee2a20-image.png]