Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    About a combination method with Proxy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
    3 Posts 2 Posters 3.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      t_wd
      last edited by

      Hi

      I want to use PFSense by the following constitution.

      | WAN
      |
      FW–- DMZ
      |
      |      HTTP Proxy(ex:  http://192.168.0.1:8080)
      |        |
      -------------  LAN
          |
        PFSense
          |
      -------------  Wireless LAN
              |
            Client

      I want to let you go by way of Proxy so that a client is connected to Internet. However, a certification screen does not appear when I use CaptivePortal to use Port number 8080 by setting of Proxy.

      When it is the setting that it does not use Proxy for, I become a certification screen.

      Can CaptivePortal use even a port number except the 80?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jeroen234
        last edited by

        rad you post 4 times still don't get it what you want

        i have a transparend squid proxy running on pfsense and the portal

        users get the portal first
        afther login the reqest is diverted from port 80 to squid port 3128

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          t_wd
          last edited by

          @jeroen234:

          rad you post 4 times still don't get it what you want

          i have a transparend squid proxy running on pfsense and the portal

          users get the portal first
          afther login the reqest is diverted from port 80 to squid port 3128

          Thank you, I got possible to use the HTTP (80).

          Installation of package was not possible so that PFSense applied it in local address, and an answer became slow

          However, HTTPS (443) and FTP (21) seem to be impossible by this method.

          Is there a method according to anything?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.