Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense on a Riverbed Steelhead

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    154 Posts 19 Posters 78.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • O
      Okijames
      last edited by

      Does anyone have a BIOS for CX570 or CX770 that's more recent than 02/14/2014? Screenshot below. I am trying to add an Samsung 970 Pro NVME drive, but it's not working, I'm thinking the BIOS is too old.

      0eb649a3-f4c7-49d8-ad7a-dfb2378220f6-image.png

      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cjohnson
        last edited by cjohnson

        I just looked at my both of my CX-770's, one i've modded slightly (added RAM/changed HDD's etc.), the other is totally stock) and they both have dates that're the same as yours.

        not sure if you've thought of this but, as possible workaround of the BIOS limitations, you might do a hybrid boot sort of thing. something like maybe put all of the minimum boot stuff on a small SATA SSD to satisfy what BIOS needs, then a kernel can take over interrogating the PCIe bus and getting the rest of what it needs from your NVMe.... maybe?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by stephenw10

          @okijames said in PfSense on a Riverbed Steelhead:

          Samsung 970 Pro NVME

          Exactly what sort of drive is that? How are you connecting it? m.2? PCIe card? An adapter of some sort?

          O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • O
            Okijames @stephenw10
            last edited by Okijames

            @stephenw10 @cjohnson M.2 NVME, I have a in a PCIE extension cable thingie. PCIE edgecard -> short cable -> M.2 socket. It "works" in that the NVME drive is recognized by ESXi, as a PCI device, but not as a storage adapter. ESXI can pass it through to a VM, but I can't use it as local shared storage for the hypervisor.

            https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07TKYMQXZ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

            PS, it is a 1TB NVME so a bit much to pass through just for pfSense :)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              mjamesPFS
              last edited by

              @freska99

              I was wondering if you ever got this running on your 1050?

              I trying to to the same and tying to understand the steps you took.

              I was able to use a USB thumb drive and install PfSense 2.5.1 on a an internal HD but none of my interfaces work including em4 and em5 which should be the Primary and Aux interfaces.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Like not detected or not passing traffic?

                The non-bypassed ports should show link at least.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  mjamesPFS
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10,

                  Thank you for the quick reply. Sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you. I finally had some time yesterday to take another look. Turns out I had a bad vLAN setting on my lab switch. I now have access to PFSense from the web interface and SSH. I still need to figure out how access the other network interfaces but for now I have the primary and aux interfaces working.

                  B/R.
                  Mike

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • F
                    foureight84 @Okijames
                    last edited by foureight84

                    @okijames Did you ever find newer bios for this board? I've been having issues using newer SATA SSDs due to the old bios. Most of them do not detect the correct capacity (1GB instead of 128GB for example).

                    I don't have access to the Riverbed support page for this product since it requires an active license.

                    O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • O
                      Okijames @foureight84
                      last edited by

                      @foureight84 I asked my contacts still working at Riverbed, and they confirmed there is no newer bios. FWIW I don't use SSDs because of a number of the packages I use write to the disk pretty heavily. In my case at least, the SSD would wear too quickly so I opted for HDD instead. Because of this I've not encountered the issue you're seeing.

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F
                        foureight84 @Okijames
                        last edited by

                        @okijames Thanks for the reply and confirmation! For now I've been using MLC SSDs (new old stocks that I can find) in ZFS mirror. That should last a long time. I'm not using doing any packet captures, just mostly default logs which is minimal. I was just hoping to be able to use larger drives later on in case I want to turn it into a Proxmox box instead.

                        O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • O
                          Okijames @foureight84
                          last edited by Okijames

                          @foureight84 FWIW Proxmox is even worse when it comes to wearing out SSDs. :)

                          That and for whatever reason the 770 (with a Xeon E3-1125C v2 CPU so 4cores at 2.5Ghz) is almost embarrassingly slow at running VMs under Proxmox. I have one stacked with 32GB RAM, running Proxmox, and really disappointed in VM performance. It is so bad, I think something must be misconfigured, but can't find anything glaring.

                          F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            foureight84 @Okijames
                            last edited by

                            @okijames haha I thought it would be. It's a pretty old CPU at this point.

                            O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • O
                              Okijames @foureight84
                              last edited by

                              @foureight84 Yup, on the plus side it is a solid/reliable machine. So I use it for a few lightweight things that need to run 24/7 without a hiccup.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Hmm, it's not that old. Just how terrible is the performance?

                                O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • O
                                  Okijames @stephenw10
                                  last edited by Okijames

                                  @stephenw10 Reminds me of 486 performance. Then again I'm basing that on my experience with a Windows VM. So maybe the lack of any sort of video card in the system is the real culprit?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Could be. Current Windows versions seem to have pretty significant hardware requirements.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P
                                      pantigon
                                      last edited by

                                      Please help me.....

                                      root: smbmsg -p
                                      Probing for devices on /dev/smb0:
                                      Device @0x10: w
                                      Device @0x32: rw
                                      Device @0x46: rw
                                      Device @0x4c: rw
                                      Device @0x5a: w
                                      Device @0x5c: rw
                                      Device @0x62: rw
                                      Device @0x7c: rw
                                      Device @0x88: rw
                                      Device @0xa2: rw
                                      Device @0xac: rw
                                      Device @0xd2: rw
                                      Device @0xd8: rw
                                      

                                      What is "smbmsg" code?
                                      Thanks.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stephenw10S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        What hardware is that?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P
                                          pantigon
                                          last edited by

                                          @stephenw10
                                          This is Riverbed CXA-255.
                                          alt text

                                          O K 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stephenw10S
                                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                            last edited by

                                            The list we had from the file in this thread only lists devices by the motherboard part number like '400-00300-01'. You'll probably need to find that.

                                            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.