PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL
-
From your original screenshot: How can you have both src and dst with a 192.168.1.x address range? Are you double Natting? WAN/LAN should be in separate IP ranges…
-
Shouldn't be anything too complicated going on … at least not by design, I probably misconfigured something:
192.168.1.6 is a box on the LAN
192.168.1.1 is the gateway's LAN interface (a /24), its WAN is 192.168.209.14 which is NAT'd because that is all the modem exposes
From your original screenshot: How can you have both src and dst with a 192.168.1.x address range? Are you double Natting? WAN/LAN should be in separate IP ranges…
-
Is this alert repeating? It says "no match" in the pic… So maybe it was being blocked previously. Clear the Firewall logs, and see if it re-appears...
-
Hi
Using the latest version of pfsense and pfblockerng, when setting to allow an ipv4 rule, it generates an auto rule. I thought, when using the advanced inbound rules that this would modify the auto rule. Instead, it just appears to ignore these settings and create a default auto open rule for dest/port - though it correctly retains the src. Also, when modifying the auto rule every subsequent modification to the pfblocker rule rewrites and resets the auto rule.
Is this by design?
Thanks (fantastic package btw!)
-
@yea:
I thought, when using the advanced inbound rules that this would modify the auto rule.
Is this by design?
Thanks (fantastic package btw!)
Thanks!
See here:
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=102470.msg612027#msg612027Change the protocol settings. :)
-
Apologies. I was entering addresses manually, not as the notes said. When using aliases it works perfectly.
-
Interesting … I put things back the way they were (as far as I can tell) and I can't reproduce the problem now ... so all good
Thanks for your help!
Is this alert repeating? It says "no match" in the pic… So maybe it was being blocked previously. Clear the Firewall logs, and see if it re-appears...
-
I just made acquaintance with a certain Latina, the sister of that other Latina. Might be introducing you to her shortly 8)
( ;D ;D ;D ).
BB, could you please look at the attached pic? This doesn't make sense, does it? This is Comodo firewall alerting because Java (used by my media indexing program) wants to go to your 10.10.10.1. Why would it want to do that?
We also had the 10.10.10.1 and NTP server, and I think something is weird. DNS Resolver –- EDIT, see second screenshot, wanted to make a pic of DNS resolver and now MRT.exe also wants to do 'stuff' at 10.10.10.1.
Something is wrong. Obviously must be something on my side, but what?
( :-* )
-
Btw, BB, prollally this is why suddenly this media manager now is DEAD SLOW, when for the past two years it was BLAZINGLY fast.
Can you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE (please :P ) suggest a solution and/or workaround? Because now every movie lookup takes 2 minutes, it used to take a second. This is not good for my heart, and you know about my heart :-*
-
Hey Mr J… Take it easy with your heart and those Latinas :)
I see that you have multiple VLANs. In the DNSBL tab, there is an option to create a Floating Permit rule. Please check that option and select all of the LAN segments (vlans etc) that need to access the DNSBL VIP... I think the reason why your devices might be slow, is that they can't get to the DNSBL VIP address. That is most likely the issue with your time out (Slowness)...
For the "Three Amigo" issue... Take a look at the Alerts tab in the "DNSBL" section, and it will list whats being blocked by DNSBL... You can click the Suppression Icon if for any FPs... However, this issue might be related to my first comment...
-
Like this plugin, first and only one I'm using so far but I'm having a problem.
Some of the feeds block properly, while some do not. At first I thought this was just Easylist, but I just found another.
I did flush the dns cache on the windowd box first
chrisj@bikatol ~ $ ns Default Server: pfbox.localdomain Address: 192.168.1.254 > 188server.com Non-authoritative answer: Server: pfbox.localdomain Address: 192.168.1.254 Name: 188server.com Address: 95.211.219.66 > zypenetwork.com Non-authoritative answer: Server: pfbox.localdomain Address: 192.168.1.254 Name: zypenetwork.com Address: 69.89.31.176 > www188.nebraskacb.mcarder.chefpa.mggschmitt.dorystarla.com Server: pfbox.localdomain Address: 192.168.1.254 Name: www188.nebraskacb.mcarder.chefpa.mggschmitt.dorystarla.com Address: 10.10.10.1
From pfbox cli
[2.3-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: grep 188server.com /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.conf local-data: "188server.com 60 IN A 10.10.10.1" grep 188server.com /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.conf local-data: "188server.com 60 IN A 10.10.10.1" grep 188server.com /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/* /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/EasyListElements.orig:||188server.com^$third-party /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/EasyListFeeds.orig:||188server.com^$third-party grep 188server.com /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/* /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/EasyListElements.txt:local-data: "188server.com 60 IN A 10.10.10.1" [2.3-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: grep zypenetwork.com /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.conf local-data: "zypenetwork.com 60 IN A 10.10.10.1" grep zypenetwork.com /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/* /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/EasyListElements.orig:||zypenetwork.com^$third-party /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/EasyListFeeds.orig:||zypenetwork.com^$third-party grep zypenetwork.com /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/* /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/EasyListElements.txt:local-data: "zypenetwork.com 60 IN A 10.10.10.1" [2.3-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: grep www188.nebraskacb /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.conf local-data: "www188.nebraskacb.mcarder.chefpa.mggschmitt.dorystarla.com 60 IN A 10.10.10.1" grep www188.nebraskacb /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/* /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/hpHosts.orig:127.0.0.1 www188.nebraskacb.mcarder.chefpa.mggschmitt.dorystarla.com grep www188.nebraskacb /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/* /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/hpHosts.txt:local-data: "www188.nebraskacb.mcarder.chefpa.mggschmitt.dorystarla.com 60 IN A 10.10.10.1"
When I thought it was just EasyList I did a: LIST ACTION disabled -> force update -> LIST ACTION enable. All are showing unbound.
Opps: grabed the wrong one above (second Easylist should have been frm my MDS.txt list)
Name: zzz.hudconnecthome.org
Address: 95.46.98.60tail -n 1 /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/MDS.txt
local-data: "zzz.hudconnecthome.org 60 IN A 10.10.10.1"grep zzz.hudconnecthome.org /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/*
/var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/MDL.orig:127.0.0.1 zzz.hudconnecthome.org
/var/db/pfblockerng/dnsblorig/MDS.orig:zzz.hudconnecthome.orgp.s. BBcan177 I was the guy on twitter talking about it on Sunday April 17th
-
Like this plugin, first and only one I'm using so far but I'm having a problem.
Some of the feeds block properly, while some do not. At first I thought this was just Easylist, but I just found another.
p.s. BBcan177 I was the guy on twitter talking about it on Sunday April 17th
Hey… welcome!
If you ping those domains from the pfSense box do they all resolve to the DNSBL VIP address?
Either your desktop has other DNS servers defined or the browser is bypassing the DNS server... what browser are you using? Ensure that the desktops only have pfSense set as its DNS Server. Might also need to exit and reopen the browser...
Flush the Browser DNS cache, and also flush the OS cache... Another option might be to create a Reject rule in the LAN interface to block any outgoing port 53 other than from the pfSense Box itself...
-
Like this plugin, first and only one I'm using so far but I'm having a problem.
Some of the feeds block properly, while some do not. At first I thought this was just Easylist, but I just found another.
p.s. BBcan177 I was the guy on twitter talking about it on Sunday April 17th
Hey… welcome!
If you ping those domains from the pfSense box do they all resolve to the DNSBL VIP address?
Either your desktop has other DNS servers defined or the browser is bypassing the DNS server... what browser are you using? Ensure that the desktops only have pfSense set as its DNS Server. Might also need to exit and reopen the browser...
Flush the Browser DNS cache, and also flush the OS cache... Another option might be to create a Reject rule in the LAN interface to block any outgoing port 53 other than from the pfSense Box itself...
already have the re-direct rule in place, it's been catching my chromecasts. (learned that by reading this and other threads / reddit, which was an awesome trick to learn btw).
Only working DNS server is the pfSense Box (cygwin):
chrisj@bikatol ~ $ ipconfig /all | grep -i "DNS Servers" DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
The 2 ipv6 ones are the equiv of the 169 addresses Microsoft used to use for ipv4. Even when I ran the windows hotfix to disable ipv6, the problem remained.
Testing in Cygwin for NSlookup and IE for the sites (because Chrome and Fire Fox have ad blockers already). Also using Chrome on my Android phone.
Ping from pfSense gets the 10.10.10.1 addresses like expected. However even after flushing DNS again the clients still go to the actual ip addresses.
[2.3-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: ping 188server.com PING 188server.com (10.10.10.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.115 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.149 ms ^C --- 188server.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.115/0.144/0.169/0.022 ms [2.3-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root:
Same from windows client with flush:
C:\Users\chrisj>ipconfig /flushdns Windows IP Configuration Successfully flushed the DNS Resolver Cache. C:\Users\chrisj>ping 188server.com Pinging 188server.com [69.162.80.55] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 69.162.80.55: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=50
-
Ping from pfSense gets the 10.10.10.1 addresses like expected. However even after flushing DNS again the clients still go to the actual ip addresses.
[2.3-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: ping 188server[.]com PING 188server[.]com (10.10.10.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.115 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.149 ms ^C --- 188server.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.115/0.144/0.169/0.022 ms [2.3-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root:
Same from windows client with flush:
C:\Users\chrisj>ipconfig /flushdns Windows IP Configuration Successfully flushed the DNS Resolver Cache. C:\Users\chrisj>ping 188server[.]com Pinging 188server.com [69.162.80.55] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 69.162.80.55: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=50
Ya you can see that the pfSense has no issue in resolving that domain to 10.10.10.1
What does a tracert 188server[.]com (kinda dangerous to post those domains as-is :) )
What happens if you clear out those two IPv6 DNS settings?
-
The following PR #107 for pfBlockerNG has been merged for pfSense 2.3 only:
pfBlockerNG v2.0.10 - Changelog:
-
Cosmetic Improvements to the Widget.
-
Add "Gateway Groups" to "Custom Gateway" Advanced In/Outbound Firewall customizations.
-
Advanced Outbound Firewall Rule customizations:
-
Switched "Custom Port" option from "Source" to "Destination" port.
-
Fix issue with "Custom Protocol".
-
-
Added a patch to fix an issue with 4 missing Countries in the MaxMind Database.
MaxMind is aware of the issue. (Countries = Africa - SS, N.America - BQ,CW,SX) -
Other under-the-hood improvements.
(Note - Double check all of your firewall Rules after this update!)
-
-
Good news, and I gives me something to look at / test. I just tried ping from my android phone, and did an nslookup on my old netbook.
both are reporting 10.10.10.1 for 188server[.]com.
After more testing on my primary system, trying different browsers (I have 2 versions of Firefox installed, 1 chrome, 1 ie, 1 edge) I got the same result regardless of what was turned on.
Turns out my problem was my AV software. Avast has an option called SecureDNS which prevents dns "hijacking" so the address your going to is really the address Avast has in their DNS Servers. It's done over a tunnel so it was never caught by Wireshark or others.
-
Hi robwalker5561,
Run these commands and it will show if there is a loopback address (Won't be the first time that IBlock does this :) ):
grep "127\.0\.0\." /var/db/pfblockerng/deny/* grep "127\.0\.0\." /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/* grep "127\.0\.0\." /var/db/aliastables/*
If it finds a loopback, then enable "Suppression" in the General Tab, and run a "Force Reload" to clear it out…
I am get a loopback address in a list but there is now Suppress option next to the ip address. How do i suppress this rule?
-
It shows "no match" in the list column, so that IP is not currently in any list. Enable "Suppression" in the General Tab, and run a "Force Reload". If it's not repeating then just ignore.
As a note, when you enable Suppression, it will also filter out any RFC1918 and loopback addresses along with the whitelisted IPs in the pfBlockerNGSuppress Alias.
-
BBCAN,
Hey- thanks for all of your hard work with this package! I'm setting up a 2nd PFsense box for a client and I'm wanting to copy over my 'pfblockerNG' config. Is there an easy way to do it other than doing it all by hand?
thanks
Jamie
-
Hello , i find issue opening somewebsites , ie when i try to open it takes long time when pfblockerNG is enabled
i uploaded a Picture of tata docomo site , showing slow load time and ping showing some connections are redirected to 10.x.x.x but its waiting there
when this happens do i need to manually whitelist all those domains
note sure if this crash is related to above error but
Crash report begins. Anonymous machine information: amd64 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #6 05adf0a(RELENG_2_3_0): Mon Apr 11 18:52:07 CDT 2016 root@ce23-amd64-builder:/builder/pfsense-230/tmp/obj/builder/pfsense-230/tmp/FreeBSD-src/sys/pfSense Crash report details: PHP Errors: [20-Apr-2016 09:34:31 Asia/Kolkata] PHP Stack trace: [20-Apr-2016 09:34:31 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 1\. {main}() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:0 [20-Apr-2016 09:34:31 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 2\. pfb_cron_update() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:425 [20-Apr-2016 09:34:31 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 3\. header() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:90 [20-Apr-2016 09:36:02 Asia/Kolkata] PHP Stack trace: [20-Apr-2016 09:36:02 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 1\. {main}() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:0 [20-Apr-2016 09:36:02 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 2\. pfb_cron_update() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:425 [20-Apr-2016 09:36:02 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 3\. header() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:90 [20-Apr-2016 09:37:35 Asia/Kolkata] PHP Stack trace: [20-Apr-2016 09:37:35 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 1\. {main}() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:0 [20-Apr-2016 09:37:35 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 2\. pfb_cron_update() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:419 [20-Apr-2016 09:37:35 Asia/Kolkata] PHP 3\. header() /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:90
Alias Count Packets Updated pfB_DNSBLIP 37930 0 Apr 20 09:59 (2) pfB_PS_v4 944 0 Apr 20 09:50 (2) pfB_Top_v4 4524 695 Apr 20 09:50 (2) pfB_Top_v6 630 0 Apr 20 09:50 (2) pfB_adserverlist 10883 9 Apr 20 09:50 (2) DNSBL_PrivacyFraudDNSGroup 95896 0 Apr 20 9:55 DNSBL_MalwareExploitDNSGroup 178126 0 Apr 20 9:57 DNSBL_SPAMDNSGroup 6689 0 Apr 20 9:57 DNSBL_MaliciousDNSGroup 20831 0 Apr 20 9:58 DNSBL_BambenekConsultingDNSGroup 732404 0 Apr 20 9:59 DNSBL_EasyList 4837 0 Apr 20 9:59 DNSBL_DNDBL 83273 0 Apr 20 9:54 Logging is disabled
-
BBCAN,
Hey- thanks for all of your hard work with this package! I'm setting up a 2nd PFsense box for a client and I'm wanting to copy over my 'pfblockerNG' config. Is there an easy way to do it other than doing it all by hand?
thanks
Jamie
Did you try the "Sync" Tab in the package?
-
@Merchant:
Hello , I find issue opening somewebsites , ie when i try to open it takes long time when pfblockerNG is enabled
Usually when sites are slow to load with DNSBL, is that you have a multi-segmented LAN, and the desktop doesn't have full access to the DNSBL VIP address… Can you ping the DNSBL VIP address? There is a setting in the DNSBL tab to auto-create a floating permit rule, then select all of the LAN subnets that need access to the DNSBL VIP…
when this happens do i need to manually whitelist all those domains
Goto the Alerts tab, and you will see all of the Domains that are blocked… You can click the "+" icon to suppress this domain... You can also manually add domains to the "Custom Suppression" list in the DNSBL tab at the bottom of that page. When you manually add domains, you need to run a "Force Reload - DNSBL" for those domains to be whitelisted...
note sure if this crash is related to above error but
/usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:90
/usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:425
/usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_update.php:419This error is from the "Update" Tab… Do you notice any issues when viewing that page? When you see this error, the next time... Please review the pfblockerng.log and see if you find any errors around the same time and send those to me...
I also notice this from your post:
pfB_DNSBLIP 37930 0 Apr 20 09:59Its quite strange for the DNSBLIP alias to have so many IPs… If you have a IP based List, add those to the IPv4 tab instead of DNSBL which is domain based. The DNSBLIP is to collect any IPs that are found in a DNSBL feed.... Its not going to cause any issues, but its better in the IPv4 tab....
-
This error is from the "Update" Tab... Do you notice any issues when viewing that page? When you see this error, the next time... Please review the pfblockerng.log and see if you find any errors around the same time and send those to me...
sure if i get same crash error again i will will upload the log
Can you ping the DNSBL VIP address? There is a setting in the DNSBL tab to auto-create a floating permit rule, then select all of the LAN subnets that need access to the DNSBL VIP...
Connection is
WAN –- PFSENSE---LAN ( Single LAN ( No van or multiple network )
i uploaded a pic in above post showing ping , i am able to ping with no delayPinging secure.adnxs.com [10.10.10.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64Its quite strange for the DNSBLIP alias to have so many IPs... If you have a IP based List, add those to the IPv4 tab instead of DNSBL which is domain based. The DNSBLIP is to collect any IPs that are found in a DNSBL feed.... Its not going to cause any issues, but its better in the IPv4 tab....
yes i will move IP based list from DNSBL to IPV4 tab
-
@Merchant:
Can you ping the DNSBL VIP address? There is a setting in the DNSBL tab to auto-create a floating permit rule, then select all of the LAN subnets that need access to the DNSBL VIP…
Pinging secure.adnxs.com [10.10.10.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64You need to run this command to check for proper connectivity to the DNSBL VIP:
You should also be able to browse to the DNSBL VIP and get the 1x1…ping 10.10.10.1
Goto the Alerts tab, and see what domains are being blocked… You can also hit F12 in the browser and open Dev Mode... Goto "console" and look for the domains that are blocked... You can try to suppress those domains that are causing you issue... Finally ensure that your desktops only have the pfSense DNS IP defined and no other DNS servers listed...
-
update
all my DNSBL list are names
http://adaway.org/hosts.txt http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/ http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&mimetype=plaintext http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.txt http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&startdate[day]=&startdate[month]=&startdate[year]=&useip=0.0.0.0 http://www.securemecca.com/Downloads/hosts.txt http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&mimetype=plaintextoup http://hosts-file.net/ad_servers.txt http://adaway.org/hosts.txt http://sysctl.org/cameleon/hosts http://adblock.gjtech.net/?format=unix-hosts https://s3.amazonaws.com/lists.disconnect.me/simple_tracking.txt http://hosts-file.net/fsa.txt http://hosts-file.net/hjk.txt http://hosts-file.net/pha.txt https://www.dshield.org/feeds/suspiciousdomains_High.txt https://s3.amazonaws.com/lists.disconnect.me/simple_malvertising.txt http://www.malwaredomainlist.com/hostslist/hosts.txt http://mirror1.malwaredomains.com/files/justdomains https://s3.amazonaws.com/lists.disconnect.me/simple_malware.txt http://hosts-file.net/emd.txt http://hosts-file.net/exp.txt http://hosts-file.net/mmt.txt http://lists.malwarepatrol.net/cgi/getfile?receipt=f1442112770&product=8&list=dansguardian http://zeustracker.abuse.ch/blocklist.php?download=domainblocklist https://malc0de.com/bl/BOOT http://hosts-file.net/grm.txt http://hosts-file.net/hfs.txt https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Dawsey21/Lists/master/main-blacklist.txt http://hosts-file.net/hphosts-partial.txt http://hosts-file.net/hphosts-partial.txt http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/hosts http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.txt http://gist.githubusercontent.com/BBcan177/4a8bf37c131be4803cb2/raw http://osint.bambenekconsulting.com/feeds/dga-feed.gz http://osint.bambenekconsulting.com/feeds/c2-dommasterlist.txt
Pinging 10.10.10.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 10.10.10.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 10.10.10.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
But when i tried to open 10.10.10.1 in webbrowser i am getting pfsense login page instead of 1x1 image , so i guess that might b the problem
so i post my detail settings
SINGLE WAN LINK to NIC 1 PFSEnse ( wan dhcp ) –-----PFsense WAN Port --------PFsense LAN ( SINGLE LAN 192.168.x.x Network )
we dont have Multi WAN or MUlti LAN /Vlan
ie two NIC Cards ( 1 connected ISP LINK ) and other NIC Card ( Connected to Switch )HTTPS is enabled for Pfsense
Installation is Fresh 2.3 install with xml backup restorededit
nginx: 2016/04/20 15:09:06 [error] 65374#0: *476 open() "/usr/local/www/track/click/30047178/community.spiceworks.com" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: 10.10.10.1, server: , request: "GET /track/click/30047178/community.spiceworks.com?p=eyJzIjoiYnIzelB6UlBqRVFBSXNvajVBX0k5VVY0SExzIiwidiI6MSwicCI6IntcInVcIjozMDA0NzE3OCxcInZcIjoxLFwidXJsXCI6XCJodHRwczpcXFwvXFxcL2NvbW11bml0eS5zcGljZXdvcmtzLmNvbVxcXC90b3BpY1xcXC8xNTY3NTk1LWNhbi1pLXAydi1hLWRlYWQtcGVyc29uYWwtY29tcHV0ZXI_dXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPWRpZ2VzdCZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9ZGlnZXN0JnV0bWU9Z3JvdXBzK3BvcHVsYXIzXCIsXCJpZFwiOlwiNzFiODNmZjE4MzU3NDhlNzkzZDE3MmYzNDY5MTQ2MzhcIixcInVybF9pZHNcIjpbXCI1Zjg4NGU0OGIyYzY3OTZlMmExYzY3ZjNhNWQ2MDY3NDljZGJhMjFjXCJdfSJ9 HTTP/1.1", host: "track.spiceworks.com"
-
BBCAN,
Hey- thanks for all of your hard work with this package! I'm setting up a 2nd PFsense box for a client and I'm wanting to copy over my 'pfblockerNG' config. Is there an easy way to do it other than doing it all by hand?
thanks
Jamie
Did you try the "Sync" Tab in the package?
LOL, nope. Sorry, I didn't see it or think it would do what I would expect. I'll give it a shot this evening!
Thanks!
-
@Merchant:
update
An obersevation: why use three different yoyo feeds:
http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&mimetype=plaintext
http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&startdate[day]=&startdate[month]=&startdate[year]=&useip=0.0.0.0
http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&mimetype=plaintextoupIs there a reason why you seperated hpHosts, instead of using the single download for them all?
http://hosts-file.net/download/hosts.ziphttp://hosts-file.net/fsa.txt
http://hosts-file.net/hjk.txt
http://hosts-file.net/pha.txt
http://hosts-file.net/emd.txt
http://hosts-file.net/exp.txt
http://hosts-file.net/mmt.txt
http://hosts-file.net/grm.txt
http://hosts-file.net/hfs.txtAs a note: Look at the pfblockerng.log, it will show a section "DNSBL Domain/IP Counts" which will show you which DNSBL Feeds have IPs… look for the .ip extension...
But when i tried to open 10.10.10.1 in webbrowser i am getting pfsense login page instead of 1x1 image , so i guess that might b the problem
Yes your problem is due to Squid… I don't use Squid, and can't really help you workaround this issue.... Others have had a similar issue, but haven't seen anyone reply with a solution yet...
-
BBCAN,
Hey- thanks for all of your hard work with this package! I'm setting up a 2nd PFsense box for a client and I'm wanting to copy over my 'pfblockerNG' config. Is there an easy way to do it other than doing it all by hand?
thanks
Jamie
Did you try the "Sync" Tab in the package?
LOL, nope. Sorry, I didn't see it or think it would do what I would expect. I'll give it a shot this evening!
Thanks!
I tried the sync tab and it worked bad ass! I should have looked at it before, sorry for bothering you & thanks for thinking of this option!
-
@Merchant:
update
An obersevation: why use three different yoyo feeds:
http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&mimetype=plaintext
http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&startdate[day]=&startdate[month]=&startdate[year]=&useip=0.0.0.0
http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&mimetype=plaintextoupIs there a reason why you seperated hpHosts, instead of using the single download for them all?
http://hosts-file.net/download/hosts.ziphttp://hosts-file.net/fsa.txt
http://hosts-file.net/hjk.txt
http://hosts-file.net/pha.txt
http://hosts-file.net/emd.txt
http://hosts-file.net/exp.txt
http://hosts-file.net/mmt.txt
http://hosts-file.net/grm.txt
http://hosts-file.net/hfs.txtAs a note: Look at the pfblockerng.log, it will show a section "DNSBL Domain/IP Counts" which will show you which DNSBL Feeds have IPs… look for the .ip extension...
But when i tried to open 10.10.10.1 in webbrowser i am getting pfsense login page instead of 1x1 image , so i guess that might b the problem
Yes your problem is due to Squid… I don't use Squid, and can't really help you workaround this issue.... Others have had a similar issue, but haven't seen anyone reply with a solution yet...
-
thank you , i will update the host's list
-
i will try modify my wpad so that host wont use proxy for 10.x.x.x network , will check today , thank you as usual , u rocks :)
update
Updated my wpad and now its working :D , thank you . its loading (1x1)
Now all websites are loading fast -
-
Has anyone noticed the dnsbl alert entries have the wrong time? Seems to be a few hours ahead from all the other firewall entries.
-
Has anyone noticed the dnsbl alert entries have the wrong time? Seems to be a few hours ahead from all the other firewall entries.
mine is showing correct
-
Has anyone noticed the dnsbl alert entries have the wrong time? Seems to be a few hours ahead from all the other firewall entries.
Which DNSBL alerts? HTTP or HTTPS. For HTTP, it takes the request time from the remote Lan device. Could the clock be off on one of your desktops?
-
Seems like HTTP timestamps are wrong. Which remote Lan device? All my laptops and desktops are Macs and their times are all correct. I am running pfsense in ESXI 6…
-
I don't know if it matters but it seems like my /usr/local/etc/php.ini has this line set
date.timezone="Etc/UTC"
when clearly /etc/rc.php_ini_setup contains the following code:
unset TIMEZONE # Fetch the timezone from /var/db/zoneinfo if present if [ -f /var/db/zoneinfo ]; then TIMEZONE=$(cat /var/db/zoneinfo) fi if [ -z "${TIMEZONE}" ]; then # Second option is from config.xml TIMEZONE=$(/usr/local/sbin/read_xml_tag.sh string system/timezone) fi if [ -z "${TIMEZONE}" ]; then # Last option, use default value from $g or Etc/UTC TIMEZONE=$(/usr/local/sbin/read_global_var default_timezone "Etc/UTC") fi
Anyone spot anything wrong? I verified the timezone is correct by running the script /usr/local/sbin/read_xml_tag.sh string system/timezone
-
Hi,
same situation in my environment. I changes from HTTPS WebUI to HTTP because WPAD is hosted on pfsense itself. But i defined all private IPs to go DIRECT and not using the proxy in the WPAD files. But unfortunately it does not work.
Further I disabled auto proxy configuration and hardcoded the proxy in my browser but DNSBL still does only work with HTTP (pfsense WebUI page) but not with HTTPS. Further it does not log anything :-(
PS:
Anybody here who could suggest a good DNSBL which focuses on command and control server and such stuff?can u post ur wpad file content , ( Look my wpad file , for me after instructing wpad to give Direct connection to 10.x.x..x now its working okay
FOR PEOPLE WITH GIF ISSUES READ THIS
If your running WPAD and have on your navigator to auto detect proxy you WILL get the webGUI of pfSense instead of the GIF but disable the auto detect proxy on the navigator you then will see the GIF…It seems that WPAD overrides everything even when it comes to OpenVPN also...
Thanks for that information. I am using WPAD with squid3 proxy. But I only get the WebUI with http websites. Is it working for you with httpS websites, too?
Can you describe if you configued something sepcidal to get pfblocker-NG + squid (http + https) working?For me it looks like it is not working fpr https and it ios not working for http and https to see the bad websites in the "Alerts" tab of pfblopcker-ng.
Regards
Well I have pfBlockerNG working just for IP I had to disable DNSBL because WPAD was overriding everything. Because WPAD files are hosted on pfSense I had to revert to HTTP on the webGUI of pfSense. But by disabling auto detect proxy then works DNSBL but then WPAD wont work BUT transparent proxy will. I guess having WPAD and DNSBL wont work at the same time. UNLESS somehow on the wpad.dat a way to direct or ignore the 10.10.10.1 something that i wish it can do with OpenVPN. You get the HTTPS sites i guess because WPAD overlaps that but the http that would be the transparent proxy which DNSBL does not have an issue. Also depends if your webGUI is HTTPS or HTTP
I also had issue with squid with wpad initially and with BBcan177 help i resolved the issue with my setup
i updated my wpad.pac file to make direct connected to 10.10.10.1
function FindProxyForURL(url,host) { if (isInNet( host, "192.168.0.0", "255.255.255.0" )) { return "DIRECT"; } if (isInNet( host, "10.10.10.1", "255.255.255.0" )) { return "DIRECT"; } return "PROXY 192.168.0.1:3128"; }
now i am able to use proxy with wpad and also get 1x1 gif while blocking
-
Hello! I just noticed today that pfBlocker is not "working" anymore. It's actually enabled and it was working fine blocking ads, now it seems nothing changed (I'm sure I haven't changed any settings) but I'm not getting ads blocked
Any ideas on what's going on? There's no errors in the logs either :(
It seems the latest blocked URLS were from April 19
DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:10,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:10,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:11,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:15:44,ui.skype.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:16:44,ui.skype.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:17:44,ui.skype.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:18:44,ui.skype.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:19:44,ui.skype.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:44,ui.skype.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:51,ssl.google-analytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:51,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:51,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:51,analytics.query.yahoo.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:51,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:51,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:52,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:52,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:52,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:52,e.crashlytics.com DNSBL Reject HTTPS,Apr 19 18:20:52,e.crashlytics.com
-
Hello! I just noticed today that pfBlocker is not "working" anymore. It's actually enabled and it was working fine blocking ads, now it seems nothing changed (I'm sure I haven't changed any settings) but I'm not getting ads blocked
Ensure that the LAN devices have only pfSense set as their DNS server. Can you ping the DNSBL VIP address? Can you browse to the DNSBL VIP address?
-
@Merchant:
I also had issue with squid with wpad initially and with BBcan177 help i resolved the issue with my setup
i updated my wpad.pac file to make direct connected to 10.10.10.1
function FindProxyForURL(url,host) { if (isInNet( host, "192.168.0.0", "255.255.255.0" )) { return "DIRECT"; } if (isInNet( host, "10.10.10.1", "255.255.255.0" )) { return "DIRECT"; } return "PROXY 192.168.0.1:3128"; }
now i am able to use proxy with wpad and also get 1x1 gif while blocking
Thanks Merchant, I hope the other users that had the same issue can get this resolved also… 8)
-
Hello! I just noticed today that pfBlocker is not "working" anymore. It's actually enabled and it was working fine blocking ads, now it seems nothing changed (I'm sure I haven't changed any settings) but I'm not getting ads blocked
Ensure that the LAN devices have only pfSense set as their DNS server. Can you ping the DNSBL VIP address? Can you browse to the DNSBL VIP address?
Hello BBcan177,
I can ping the IP without problems, and all my devices are using my pfsense IP as DNS (as before) so it shouldn't be a problem there. However, if by "browse the DNSBL IP" you mean that I should get a reply when trying to open it from a browser then no, I get an error
But as I said, I get ping
-
I can ping the IP without problems, and all my devices are using my pfsense IP as DNS (as before) so it shouldn't be a problem there. However, if by "browse the DNSBL IP" you mean that I should get a reply when trying to open it from a browser then no, I get an error
Do you have a multi-segmented LAN? ie -vlans etc… If so, there is an option in the DNSBL Tab, to create a Floating Permit rule. Select all the Lan segments that need access to the VIP...
When you browse to the VIP, it should return the 1x1... Have you tried a different browser? or other LAN device?