• Draytek to pfsense site to site problem with reconnecting

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    949 Views
    M

    In your Phase 2 settings under Advanced Options set an address on the remote network to be pinged. This may allow the tunnel to re-establish after it disconnects. Try adjusting the settings of dead peer detection in Phase 1 or disable it completely and see what happens.

  • Active Directory over IPSEC

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    It seems like there is traffic being blocked by the IPSec tunnel. Try doing packet captures to trace where the packets are getting to. That way you'll be able to see which part needs to be troubleshooted.

    Update (18/12/2013):

    I just set up a mock network using VMware with two pfSense boxes and a DC behind one and a windows 8 client behind the other. The client authenticated fine over the IPSec tunnel I set up. There must be something you are doing wrong. I suspect it's a DNS issue.

  • Questions about VPN IPsec

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    What IPSec client are you using?

    Do you mean restrict access from remote IP's connecting to your mobile VPN or restrict access within the mobile VPN to other networks?

    Just set up another phase 2 entry on the site-to-site VPN on the IPSec endpoint that your mobile users connect to using your mobile VPN subnet as the local subnet.

    Depending on your IPSec client there should be an option to automatically route all traffic through the VPN. You will need to add an outbound NAT rule for your IPSec subnet.

  • MSS clamping not apparently working

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    4k Views
    P

    I continued my query here on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/1s8v4s/mss_clamping_not_apparently_working/

    Any ideas as regards the general nature of my blackhole and how to eradicate or work around it?  I'm still trying to work out whether it's an issue with my Infinity line or my virtualised PFsense router on the end of it, although replacing the PFsense instance made no difference.

  • IPSEC VPN and route traffic between Tunnels.

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    8k Views
    G

    Should be possible in 2.1 (I haven't tested it yet)

  • Site to site ipsec with cisco router

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    Dec 4 21:42:09    racoon: ERROR: HASH mismatched

    Your P1 hash type is mismatched on pfSense and the Cisco router. Post your Cisco config and pfSense Phase 1 config here.

  • Racoon: ERROR: /var/etc/ipsec/racoon.conf:14: "e" syntax error

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    jimpJ

    Packages would not touch that. There aren't any that would replace the racoon binaries.

    The safest way forward would be to backup your config, wipe/reinstall 2.1, and then restore your backup.

  • Using Virtual IP (CARP) WAN address for Phase 1 negotiation. SOLVED

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • How to route http(80) port traffice to vpn?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    708 Views
    No one has replied
  • Security Settings Problems.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • Pfsense IPSEC to Blackberry Bold 9700

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    T

    Hello

    Look at this thread

    http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,24463.msg127009.html#msg127009

  • IPsec with NAT not routing?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    D

    Just an update:

    I managed to get the Phase2 settings correct, (tunnel is up and happy) but the NAT/BINAT doesn't seem to work.

    I wanted my internal subnet 192.168.2.x NAT to 10.148.20.96 / 27 and use the IPSec tunnel for accessing 10.x.x.x on the clients side. No NAT is taking place, and packets go out on the WAN instead of being NATed and sent through the IPSec tunnel :( So either I'm doing something wrong (most probably) or pfSense is not doing the NAT properly.

    So, in the end I had to revert to setting up the (so far) unused opt2 network, using the subnet required by my client, configure DHCP to only give out addresses in this subnet range, connect a Wifi Acess Point, and connect the computers which need access to the VPN to this Wifi AP (while still using cable for normal LAN+Internet), and finally setting up static routes on the computers for accessing the 10.x.x.x VPN over the Opt2 interface.

    Really a shame having to complicate things like this, when it would have been so much more convenient using the NAT capabilities of pfSense. If anybody has any idea of what I did wrong, you're welcome to share  ;)

    Cheers,
    Dan

  • IPSEC VPN connect to mobile client (shrew client)

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    N

    Thank you guys for your answer

  • Roadwarrior vpn, windows 7 and macintosh

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    J

    Hello,

    As it happens, I have been getting these messages in my ipsec logs:

    failed to pre-process ph2 packet [Check Phase 2 settings, networks]

    but never could figure it out.  I also noticed that on the shrewsoft vpn trace program that Security associations would only show up in "larval" state, and shortly be removed from the table.

    I have been playing with things and found this thread: http://forum.gta.com/forum/user-community-support/how-to/190-shrewsoft-vpn-client-problem

    This version of shrewsoft (2.2.2) has an additional thing to configure on the policy tab: change Policy Generation Level to "unique" and it works: the connection establishes correctly and my formerly  "larval" entries change to "mature" and remain in place.

    If I come back in the next couple of days and close this thread, it is because this solved my problem.

    –jason

  • Automatic IPSec Rules

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ

    For IPsec, you need to allow:

    udp/500 (ISAKMP) udp/4500 (NAT-T) ESP

    You need only allow those from your remote IPsec peers and not the world, unless you use mobile IPsec tunnels.

  • Help with NAT+IPsec on 2.1

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    D

    Hi all, my enviroment is a little different. In my conf I nat to a single address. Is a "one-way" configuration.

    I never tested the configuration with the bi-nat. (nat of entire network)

    I confirm that works fine, with nat on single addres, and a fortinet gateway on the other side.
    I add that works fine with 2 phase2, with different source networks. This is needed to grant access also from openvpn roaming users.

    Can I help you little more if you send the real configuration and the log with racoon in debug mode.

    Bye

    DavideDB

  • VPN functionality after upgrade from 1.2.3 to 2.1

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    A

    OpenVPN not working… IPsec not working... PPTP not working... No help, no metter. I downgraded to 1.2.3 and it works perfectly...

  • Multiple mobile client phase 1 entries

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    921 Views
    No one has replied
  • I've never done IKE Phase II like this before, Can anyone help?

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    L

    Thanks for taking the time to walk through it with me.  Much appreciated.

  • IPSEC Vpn SiteToSite ZyWALL 300 USG

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    E

    @andmattia:

    Phase 1 go up ok but when I try to start tunnel on phase 2 it doesn't work
    ERROR: error message: '"Could not find acceptable proposal $ '.
    ERROR: notification NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN received in informational exchange.

    Could it be, that some your proposals in phase2 (crypto and hash) are different/wrong? All phase 2 settings should be configured identically …

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.