• IGMP - RECV unk: 0x22/0x00 from 192.168.16.101 to 224.0.0.22

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    F
    Your device might not support vlan tagging so can you get your switch to tag the packets/frame as they come in and strip them as they go to the device?
  • Pfsense 2.2.5 and Pfsense 2.3

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    H
    2.2.5 is a maintenance release of 2.2 branch. 2.3 is a new release with a new gui & new freebsd base & new package system. just check out the 2.3 snapshots and you'll see the differences. (don't recommend it on any production systems just yet)
  • Accessing pfsense webGUI through WAN using public IP

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    13k Views
    johnpozJ
    "Wow!! what a mess I had done." Said to say this is like 99.9% of the issues people have.. When in firewall rules are source ports given - almost NEVER!!  Most applications use a random source port, there are only a couple of exceptions - dns with zone transfers can use 53 as source and as dest.  Any is almost allows the source port.. Not paying attention to what port the service is actually listening on.. Glad you got it sorted.. Hope this thread helps the next guy..  Most threads could be like 2 posts.. Post up your rules and what your trying to do and could point out where the mistake was made..  It's almost always a MESS ;)  Not understanding how the rules are evaluated, top down.  Not understanding that you put rules on interface traffic will enter pfsense, etc.. Now what you should be doing is rethinking the whole idea of webgui open to the public net – I had mine open all of 10 seconds to get the screen shot.. And then OFF again to the public.  I admin pfsense and my network remotely via vpn access how any sane person would do it ;)
  • Downloading not stable

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    2k Views
    johnpozJ
    Nobody said it was worth anything other than the OP ;)  Pretty useless in feature set compared to pfsense for sure..  I was just remarking that its still being developed is all.. I highly doubt the OP went to the commercial version.. But sure maybe..
  • [Closed] System and network slow, DHCP problem??

    29
    0 Votes
    29 Posts
    6k Views
    MellowlynxM
    Update time So I had enough of this problem and because I got two older server cases from my company I made one of the cases run pfSense and replace it with my machine, my old one moved to the cafe. After moving the nic's and restored the backup everything is running fine. The system is now running 8 Days 22 Hours and all is good no problems at all. Thanks all for the response,
  • MOVED: transparent Proxy Settings Problem

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    538 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: pfsense becomes unresponsive, forcing a hard boot

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    531 Views
    No one has replied
  • PfSense & IPTV Multicast

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    5k Views
    G
    What reconfiguring did you do? I split it off into its own vlan as well but I'm still seeing the "unknowns" in igmp's log. Any tips?
  • PfSense Appliance v. Router plus pfSense Appliance for SOHO or SMB

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    611 Views
    No one has replied
  • Can't start miniupnpd service

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    @doktornotor: Omit the tunnel interface from the setup. IPv6 is not supported with "dig holes into your network" feature. If I'm following you (and the pull request you linked) correctly, the version of miniupnpd in 2.2.4 does not support UPnP or NAT-PMP for IPv6, and at the very least you would like the pfSense GUI to reflect this; is that accurate? @doktornotor: And - if your v4 WAN is RFC1918, this feature is totally useless for you. The WAN traffic would need to be allowed and forwarded on whatever is in front of your pfSense box, and LAN -> LAN never goes through the firewall. I fail to see how this feature is useless for me. The pfSense firewall is indeed running between HETUN6 and LANV6; if I have no rules, all packets to IPv6 LAN hosts are filtered, while manually adding rules for e.g. ICMP or TCP port 80 passes those packets as expected. My IPv4 edge router/firewall/NAT does not get in the way because pfSense is already tunnelled to the HE endpoint, and all IPv6 WAN traffic goes over that tunnel. Current state of affairs: I can manually create IPv4 firewall rules on my existing IPv4 edge router I can manually create IPv6 firewall rules on my pfSense instance Applications using UPnP can only create IPv4 rules on my edge router Desired state (although sounds like not possible without mucking around with different miniupnpd binaries): Manual rules same as above Applications using UPnP can create IPv4 rules on my edge router and IPv6 rules on my pfSense instance
  • Newbie build advice please

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    650 Views
    No one has replied
  • (2.2.4) Loss of WAN link brings VLAN interfaces down temporarily

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    A
    Finally solved this problem - seems like the onboard NICs (Intel) had some fault or pathology. Disabled the onboard NICs, installed a four port Intel server card, and it's working fine now.
  • New pfSense box and FreePBX help

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    730 Views
    V
    @Vampir1c: Hey everyone, this is been driving me nuts. I recently had to set up a new pfSense box when the other one died, I got the network up and running and all of the phones that were configured continue to work, unless you factory reset them. They become unprovisioned after that. I manually put the tftp server in the phones and it connects but then doesn't make a call. My guess is that they aren't pulling the configurations from the Freepbx/asterisk box we have. We have the freepbx box offsite. I've created SIP and RTP rules for the box as well as best as I could. I have the tftp server entered in the DHCP server too. For the life of me these phones aren't working. Anyone have any insight please. Thank you! I'm an idiot, spent hours doing a bunch of complex crap to find TFTP not enabled for LAN in System: Advanced: Firewall and NAT
  • Crash Report

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    770 Views
    C
    Your PHP and modules don't match. Such as: PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: session: Unable to initialize module Module compiled with module API=20121212 PHP    compiled with module API=20100525 and you're on 2.2.0 (kernel at least, some world modifications were done), not 2.2.5, so moving thread. Upgrade to 2.2.4, and don't do any manual modifications to PHP or its files, and that problem will go away. If it's preventing you from being able to upgrade, reinstall 2.2.4 clean, and restore your config backup.
  • {SOLVED} Amazon PF sense

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    5k Views
    A
    @cmb: Support for upgrades is something we'll get added for a future release. No specific target version in mind at this instant, but hopefully something we can have done for 2.3. Do you know if this is coming with the 2.3 release? Is there a existing bug number or shall I file a bug for tracking?
  • Monitoring bendwidth from WAN to LAN

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    961 Views
    KOMK
    There are other tools that can do that.  Check the Traffic Monitoring forum for more information.
  • Moved

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    428 Views
    No one has replied
  • Strange slow down between 2 sites.

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    897 Views
    F
    You'll need to eliminate the HW at either end before you can look at the ISP infrastructure. Do you spot any patterns like excessive number of states in the state table, whats the ram usage like, is the swap being used and anything else thats seems unusual when you experience the slow down. Might even be worth checking the workload on each core to see if there is a problem with the FreeBSD OS scheduler, as its quite easy to make various programs run on a particular core which then slows that core up as it gets overloaded leading to slowdown of the rest of the cores on cpu. If you cant find anything wrong with your hw, then looking at the internet infrastructure seems like the only option left, and yes ISP's can do bandwidth throttle-ling quite easily even if you have an unlimited data package at either end, its also why the market forces didnt win out in the rigged game as theres little technical difference between adsl and sdsl modems, other than upload speed. I believe its harder to bruteforce crack large amounts of ssl data compared to short bursts, but with the fact the ISP/Govt will have a complete oversight of the entire communication from TLS handshake to goodbye, getting your certs should make it easier to bruteforce crack the transmission to then see what you were transmitting which is why having so much functionality on your firewall increases the risk. One way to eliminate the FW hardware being at fault is to shift the openvpn functionality onto separate machines at either end and then just use pfsense to do the routing and fw. Theres also nothing stopping you using pfsense again to manage openvpn on your seperate vpn boxes. Where you create and manage the certs for your vpn is up to you, personally I am of the view to isolate various functionality onto individual machines as a zero day could give complete access to a machine and with so many eggs in one basket, makes it easy picking for hackers. When looking for HW changes, also keep an eye on other devices in your network, just this morning I caught my TalkTalk isp supplied set top tv box exploring the network looking for other network service facilities as it couldnt get online, despite all its network settings being correct. Its interesting to watch how devices react when different aspects of net functionality become no longer available. I'd like to suggest its harmless but as most of it is encrypted or uses an algorithm which makes it hard to decipher the meaning of the plaintext context, one cant help but be increasingly suspicious especially as its quickest to hack from a rogue device inside your network.
  • Remmina local client won't connect to remote vnc server

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    18k Views
    E
    Fixed. The server was faulty. Installed a different server and works.
  • Disabled admin - locked out of web GUI

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RonpfSR
    Or to Reset the webConfigurator password ;)
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.