It should be fine

Just replaced it and the error disappeard. Thanks jimp Btw file wasnt empty so probably some blank lines.

It seems that in the pfsense forum only network noobs hang around ;) not any creative idea for this problem ?

Thank you all, for Captive portal server I can allowed IP for Manager group, It worked.

Bare in mind though that your results seem to show your CPU is not running at 100% so there is no need to offload calculations to the NIC. In fact if the NIC/driver is the bottle neck in your system it may be better to have your CPU doing those calculations. Steve

Its a point to point line… With a wagon wheel you mean: honeypot like /23 covering the guest subnets separate guest subnets /24

See here for somebody else's experiences.

Cool- good to see its working for you! Now I need to go loiok at my setup and see if I have that checked or not… :)

I JUST figured that out myself (by trial and error) and logged back in here to let everyone know. Thanks for posting this! If I hadn't been desperate enough to try something, you would have saved my life here. I learned also that to do it easier, you can just type "viconfig", which will load the config, and upon closing it will kill the cached config file, causing PFsense to reload the new config. Means you don't have to reboot.

Far as I know you must have 3. One for each physical nic and one cluster that is "shared".

I have fixed my problem….finally. I was finally able to add in a route to Firewall A into Firewall B.  This now allows items behind Firewall B to see the servers behind Firewall A.

Solution to my problem is here. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=38911.0 However, I am unable to setup the bridge via the GUI. Anyone have the proper steps or can point me to a link that shows the process. thanks.

meh found the solution on user dn i had put only the username the right is to put "cn=rad.adm,cn=users,dc=rad,dc=local"

Ok no 1 sorted. No used to having to put the block rule at the top as used to the cheap stuff.  Just need to sort out the content filter and I am home and dry. Thanks

Gotcha, thank you!  ;D

No I'm talking about their online client that downloads and runs on your machine every time you go to the site, nothing special. I was just pointing out that of all the bandwidth testing sites out there speedtest.net is the only one I've found that can test multiple connections. Steve

You are right sorry for not giving this information. My hardware setup i already explained but the problems are not coming from it. After i deleted the Snort interface which i setup things work so below you will find a list of the rules i was using : snort_attack-responses.rules snort_backdoor.rules snort_bad-traffic.rules snort_bad-traffic.so.rules snort_blacklist.rules snort_botnet-cnc.rules snort_content-replace.rules snort_ddos.rules snort_exploit.rules snort_exploit.so.rules snort_finger.rules snort_ftp.rules snort_icmp-info.rules snort_icmp.rules snort_icmp.so.rules snort_misc.rules snort_misc.so.rules snort_netbios.rules snort_netbios.so.rules snort_other-ids.rules snort_phishing-spam.rules snort_scan.rules snort_specific-threats.rules snort_spyware-put.rules snort_telnet.rules snort_tftp.rules snort_virus.rules snort_web-misc.rules snort_web-misc.so.rules snort_web-php.rules snort_x11.rules Thanks again for any ideas.