Yes more details required here.
It's certainly possible to add however many VLANs you need to trunk out of one of the LAN ports.

Each VLAN needs to be configured on the LAN parent interface, mvneta1, as well as in the switch config.

Steve

Well lets hope nothing too wrong with it, finally got around to updating my 3100s and 2440 to p2 ;) heheeh

Offices super quiet for MLK day I guess.. Wasn't seeing any real traffic on them - so updated them..

@grimson
Thanks for pointing that out to me. I will give that a try to see if it resolves the issue.

Remove the package. Upgrade to pfSense 2.4.4-p2. Reinstall the package.

If you don't have that function, you are not on a current version of pfSense.

@asv345h said in [Resolved] pfSense hangs when WAN is unstable or lost:

And, for your amusement. I recently found this homemade cable splitter hidden away in the ceiling which would explain my WAN issues.

WOW! There are some real "geniuses" in this world!!!

I'm surprised the cable company didn't catch that, as they do a lot of work to ensure the integrity of their system, as they are required by law, to prevent interference to other services.

I will not create a loop any time soon.
If I will find the solution, be sure that I'll post it here.
Have a good one!

@mgbolts Occasionally I run into similar problems and then I am thankful for any hints myself, ☺.

@stephenw10 Works like a charm!

Thanks for the clarifications @nkaminski and @stephenw10

No sorry, I had assumed you wanted to avoid writes to the on-baord eMMC. Writes to an mSATA SSD should be no problem.

Steve

@brians That actually makes quite a bit of sense. I will try to install one and let you all know how it goes. Thank you!

Using the acme package might be a solution. I haven't tried that.

That link helped to get me started. Using the correct search terms massively helps getting more relevant search results. Thanks a lot for the quick response and the nudge in the right direction.

@jimp

Ack

pls advice what was wrong for future refs https://forum.netgate.com/topic/139651/problems-with-webroorftp-method/14

This :
@jakeyg said in Problem with email authentication from the pf sense box:

do i have to forward it as a rule on my receiving account?

looks promising to me.

pfSense can send to one destination.

@Gertjan and @JKnott , Thank you both for explaining this in a way that makes total sense.

I dug around some old mailing lists. The warning pertains to cases where a person has a normal account on the host, and root access in a jail. He can then suid a binary, eg. vi, and use that suid executable on the host.
If you where to have this edge case, the problem is easy to fix, just chmod 0700 your jail dir on the host.
SHM was also mentionen but as I stated, it's disabled by default.

Yes, you should update to 2.4.4p2 when you can. Be aware that is quite a significant upgrade however:
https://www.netgate.com/blog/pfsense-2-4-4-release-now-available.html

https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/install/upgrade-guide.html

Steve

You would expect code in HEAD to be in the next release. That page was last updated in August though.

FreeBSD 11.2 that pfSense 2.4.4 is built on includes those patches:
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-18:03.speculative_execution.asc

Steve

@mike69 said in pfsense.org missing 2.4.4-p2 download:

Paste [solved] at the beginning of your title in the first post.

Thank you

Sorry for my english.

Not a problem!