pfSense itself must already have a static IP address on that interface. The DHCP server would not be able to run there if it didn't.

The 'Copy my MAC' function there is the MAC for client you're accessing the gui from, not the pfSense MAC.

Steve

I work for IPinfo. If we are not providing accurate IP geolocation data for you, consider submitting an IP correction request: https://ipinfo.io/corrections

The request goes through the verification process. If the correction is verified within 24-48 hours the geolocation data gets updated.

@johnpoz @dobby_ Thank you I will explore

@rcoleman-netgate Sorry, can not reproduce now this error to make screenshots. Did fresh reinstall of Windows 11 and for this moment no any warnings. That was standard error warning "your connection is not secure and site can steeling your sensitive data."))) Took a look on certificate of this site and was intercept with additional certificate from my ISP! No any idea , how it possible during using of VPN. My laptop was connected with VPN client (ExpressVPN) throw home router ((Router not from ISP and firmware is OpenWRT ) to pfSense box (pfSense plus 23.01 is installed on old laptop). But this warning start coming not immediately on fresh copy of Windows but a few days later. Now after reinstalling will watching out this situation again(((

@ffuentes said in Logs Settings and OpenVPN:

After upgrading from the latest 22 branch to 23.01 I lost my logs settings page
Also OpenVPN no longer wants to start for nether client or server.

I fixed the OpenVPN issue with the patch: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/13963

@Stugots open a ticket at https://go.netgate.com and include your current Netgate ID and the order number from your original CE->Plus upgrade token.

I agree, it should almost always be bridged if you're running VBox in any sort of permanent way.

400Mbps between VMs is pretty slow though. That seems like it must be a problem in the VBox config somehow. Though it's been many years since I ran in Windows.

Ok. I can see it now. Thanks for your help.

@viragomann
Yeah I did before you replied and that's actually what told me how it works haha. I thought "it can't be that".

@efriseer
Wake on LAN packets are broadcasted by default. So the packets do not pass a router at all.

If the bot belongs to the server anyhow you can possibly put it behind pfSense as well.
Or send the WoL packet from any other host which resides within the servers L2, maybe from pfSense itself.

@billy_c

Thanks for the additional information Billy! It's all helpful.

@johnpoz said in PfSense pretty slow GUI opening FW rule:

@operations said in PfSense pretty slow GUI opening FW rule:

I don't even use PfBlocker

So you don't have any large aliases setup like with all of the internet IP ranges in them?

Nope, couple of aliasses with one to max 6 or 7 IP's.

Other options here might be simpler but Home Assistant cloud is pretty cheap and since there is an pfsense integration that makes all the stats accessible from anywhere without “exposing” direct access to pfsense to the internet. There are other security risks involved with this approach. Just wanted to throw in some other options.

@operations said in Fine tuning PfSense for network with AD:

@stephenw10 yes i have my AD DNS as a forwarder pointed at PfSense atm. Just wanted to check this part.

Then setting the override will allow pfSense to resolve names in AD DNS (e.g. local SMTP).

Private is not necessary.

You can also override the reverse DNS if you have AD DNS set to use/hold the reverse zone. Then it can look up LAN IPs.

@stephenw10 Solved by set in firewall rule( Lan traffic to ExpressVpn) default gateway to ExpressVpn. Thank you for your assistance. Have a good weekend!
Screenshot 2023-03-25 022907.png

Are you trying to connect to the IP address(es) directly? Or using fqdns, which would go via Cloudflare?

Do you see the connections coming in if you run a packet capture or check the state table?

Steve

It's probably possible. You'd need to arrange VLANs shared between the physical and virtual pfSense instances such that all interfaces share a layer 2 connection with each other.

Steve

Hmm, the last thing shown there is a zfs command. If it was unable to write to the drive whatever is accepting connections there could also be unable and eventually fill the buffers causing that queue overflow.
However usually that would also prevent writing the crash report.

Are you able to reproduce this?

Steve