@marcelloc:

if you have php skill, take a look on sarg package(sarg_reports.php and sarg_frame.php), I've limited it's access to pfsense users permissions.

Thanks. I'll give it a shot.

Edit: Where in the file structure could I find those files?

Poster above has only posted 3 times. All identical posts linking to his blog.
I don't wish to put anyone off contributing but this seems a little suspicious.  ;)

If I'm wrong then I apologise.

Steve

@ptt:

@sreerajuv:

U can find Multi wan configuration in followink link

http://linuxhotcoffee.blogspot.in/2012/09/pfsense-201-dual-wan-configuration.html

Having "WAN1" on Tier 1 & "WAN2" on Tier 2 and using "Member Down" as trigger level you are NOT Doing "Load Balance" you are doing "Fail Over".

Please review your "Blog" post, then come back with accurate info.

You can check the info from the pfSense Docs: http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-WAN_2.0#Gateway_Groups

If any two gateways are on the same tier, they will load balance.

If they are on different tiers, they will do failover preferring the lower tier.

If the tier is set to "Never" then the gateway is not considered part of this group.

Also, I think this was more of a hardware question, of how to get 5 physical ports accessible with his hardware than how to configure them (although, I wouldn't wager against that being the next step/need/question.)

You may want to try the 2.1 snapshots which will likely have better SATA support. Of course if you're happy with CF then I'd stick with that.

Steve

We got up this morning to even worse connectivity. It would be up for 30 seconds and then down for 5 minutes. I ran to the store and bought a new modem and the problem went right away. I'll keep an eye on it but the only other thing I can think would do it would be the hard drive failing in my pfSense box, though SMART data is not showing any issues.

@Rasco:

I am looking for a script that can ping hosts on the LAN and WLAN and when there are no host left, then pfSense router can halt the system.
The reason is that my network 70% of the day doing nothing.

Why not do it the other way around? Configure your router to use wake on lan (WOL) and if there IS traffic, it boots up and stays up. Sounds dangerous to allow a script to shut down the system. How ever a quick and dirty shell or perl script that checks the output of, for example tcpdump on an interface and a loop and a counter to check if nothing happened for X amount of minutes etc.

OT: If electricity cost is the issue, why not switch to less power hungry components such as Intel Atom or similar, the power consumption on these while idling is almost none and probably switches, UPS, etc consumes more power than the router itself during these times your network users are busy IRL?

Cheers
E

Should just be a matter of importing it via the certificates manager:
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Certificate_Management

Steve

Hi!

OK I went to: Diagnostics: Packet Capture
and start to capture my gateway IP. In log now I have ping echo request and ping echo reply every second.
So I should monitor this and when link disconnected I stop to capture and see if there is a gap in log file.

Correct?

Regards,
m

Actually in many configurations, pfSense 2.0.x is much faster than 1.2.3 with interfaces. Especially with large numbers of VLANs.

There are quite a few factors that can go into it though. It really depends on the specific action you're taking that you believe feels slow.

Those come up now and then on FreeBSD lists - since you're basically using FreeBSD in a server role there (mostly squid, and freeradius), suggestions for tuning the values mentioned on the error for FreeBSD in general may be good to follow.

Have a search/look through the freebsd-stable and/or freebsd-questions archive and the FreeBSD forum.

Sorry to dig up this old thread, but this happened to me recently, TWICE.

And the fix for me was to go inside lightsquid config and change the squid log directory to var/squid/log. The default on install tell lightsquid to search on var/squid/logs

You can just reassign the LAN interface from the webgui in Interfaces: Assign network ports:
Use the drop down to set LAN as bridge0. However there is a strong possibility that when you do that you will lock yourself out of the box. Make sure you have firewall rules in place so that doesn't happen, or some plan to get back in!
See my post here, particularly the attached screenshots.

The way bridges are controlled in 2.0.X is in fact better once you realise how it works, it's more flexible. However I agree it's confusingly different.  ;)

Steve

Not entirely clear what you're trying to do, can you elaborate?