@Gertjan I from time to time, also love to game, and there, buffbloat fixing is important, congrats to you, to have fiber connection!! Me only on cable internet 1000 MBit (LOL, Vodafone promise is a lie, only keeps that speed in deep night, as cable internet is a shared connection, in evenings, often bad bufferbloat values and speeds below 1000 MBit) and my uplload as always in Germany, is sadly asynchron, limited to only 50 MBit upload sadly. But its all OK, I as a private person/user, can live with that. Enjoy your Fiber connection!! Hope one day, we will also be able to benefit Fiber Quality connections. SQM is just, fantastic on OpenWRT, best for fixing bufferbloat with SQM and piece_of_cake setup. I do my Bufferbloat testing here -> https://speed.cloudflare.com/ Shows detailed info on nearly all parameters

@rcknrll said in Connecting HomeKit Enabled Router to pfsense?: I suppose extra round of network address translation could lead to unwelcome issues. @Gblenn thanks for the advice, i will try to employ your recommendation this weekend. Well, the one major thing is that with Linksys connected on the WAN port, pfsense has nothing to do with any of the connections on the LAN side of the Linksys router. So DHCP for example needs to be handled by Linksys, not pfsense in that case. It would work, as long as you make sure the subnets are different as in 192.168.1.1/24 on pfsense and 192.168.DIFFERENT.1/24 on Linksys. But you are then just putting a whole separate network on a VLAN. And you can not communicate from pfsense LAN to Linksys LAN without some effort on your part, like opening ports etc. It would be like coming in from the internet... I'm sure there may be instructions out there for your Linksys model on what things to do to truly make it into an AP. Perhaps it is VLAN aware as well and then you could extend your VLAN onto the wifi network. So if you wanted you could have a Guest network on VLAN 20 and the rest on the default subnet under pfsense for example.

@stephenw10 Nice. Thank you. I will test with the system patche.

@stephenw10 Yes we plan to reboot it

@ClayJones said in Using PFSense and a transparent firewall to create a pure IPv6 network: ust as a follow up. The firewall idea is working well. It is remarkable how fully fleshed out IPv6 really is. Only a handful of apps or websites don't work. Exactly. I fail to understand why some are so reluctant to move to it. With some, I suspect it's deliberate ignorance. I've had it on my home network for over 14 years and it just works! BTW, I remember the days when it was necessary to use a tunnel to get it. I did that for almost 6 years, before my ISP provided native IPv6.

I figured it out! The DNS resolver with pfSense on VBox is just broken; I switched it over to the DNS forwarder, and it worked as it should have.

@marcosm https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15769 Thanks Marcos.

You mean using two separate public IPs for outbound NAT from two internal subnnets? Yes, that should be fine if so. You'd have to switch outbound NAT to manual or hybrid mode and add a rule to do it for at least one of those subnets. Steve

SOLVED: a very basic issue, non-related to pfsense etc The Lastpass-Chrome-extension always substituted my username into the field for the bind-user in the auth-server-config. And that could not work. Now with tests on the shell I figured that out and replaced it with a correct bind-user. Things work now! sry for the noise

@stephenw10 Yeah, a combined widget with a automatic reboot timer, a rollback timer and such could be REALLY cool.

@stephenw10 Ok, will try today this too. Thanks.

Indeed, I would have expected it to be. I would have tried stopping then starting (not restarting) IPSec if you can. It's possible it still had some part of that config present.

@smokinjo said in Updating pfsense before using as firewall?: Can I just connect it to the local network and log in? Pfsense will be behind the firewall, but updating things should work fine. Yes, as long as there is no subnet conflict between the WAN and default LAN (192.168.1.1/24). If your existijg LAN is already using that you would need to set a different LAN subnet in pfSense first.

Yeah I am pretty much an exclusive firefox user, while I do have other browsers, edge and chrome installed. I almost never use them other than odd testing of something here or there. I only ever interact with the pfsense gui using firefox and have never ran into any sort of issue editing anything. Currently using 131 of firefox.

@pFence Did you create redmine bug report already?

I was using outlook with app password and login and it just fails to connect

@mikek DOH! thanks! I thought of that right after I posted but haven't edited yet. how is that ;) Still doing a lot of learning myself. trying to get involved and posting forces me to thing through these scenarios.

@smokinjo You can restore forwards to a new or same config version: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/backup/restore-different-version.html Restore will prompt you to assign interfaces. Click Save there before you click Apply. Super easy as long as you have the same number or fewer interfaces on the old router.

Aha. Yes that's because tailscale isn't present at that point but you have assigned it as an interface. But tailscale should never be assigned. You should unassign it. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/14780

That sounds like the server is blocking those pings from outside it's subnet. You can confirm that by running a pcap on the interface connected to the server in pfSense whilst pinging from the laptop.