@bagusf said in DHCPv6 response cannot go through the pfsense:
Is that true?
If have not tried that operation mode but as your linked document says: "It is normally best to avoid such configurations as they can be problematic, ..." There's a reason why network traffic is divided into layer two and three.
@bagusf said in DHCPv6 response cannot go through the pfsense:
And i follow this guide...
I still fail to understand why you would want to bridge but not to route. What advantages will you get from this?
@bagusf said in DHCPv6 response cannot go through the pfsense:
Hmm.. Lets just say, I have a PC with VMWare installed, connected to IPv6 Network. Inside the VMware I make several VM for different proposes. To improve the security, I want pfsense to act as bridge and firewall inside the VMWare.
You won't get increased security with bridging mode. I would consider a Router + Filtered network more secure. But if you think I'm wrong, please try to convince me.
In the end I think IPv6 has its strengths within routing since it's just large. Exploit that. This guide might give you more comfort idk but I doubt it will be security. Everything you filter in bridged mode you can also filter in routed mode, so.