Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Gateway monitor down

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    83 Posts 5 Posters 17.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @kevindd992002
      last edited by

      It was fixed in 21.05.1. https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/21-05-1.html

      It only affected multicore arm32 anyway. It would have been the same on your old ISP.

      Steve

      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kevindd992002 @stephenw10
        last edited by

        I see. Since my firewalls are really just for home use (not mission critical), can I just upgrade to the 2.6.x CE dev release to get all the latest updates? I know Christian McDonald is suggesting to do this.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Yes, I would do that. I have been running 2.6/22.01 on my primary router her for months now.

          Obviously be sure to backup first and have a copy of the 2.5.2 installer on hand anyway.

          Steve.

          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • K
            kevindd992002 @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 said in Gateway monitor down:

            Yes, I would do that. I have been running 2.6/22.01 on my primary router her for months now.

            Obviously be sure to backup first and have a copy of the 2.5.2 installer on hand anyway.

            Steve.

            And when 2.6 stable comes out, can I simply upgrade from dev to latest stable without any issues?

            As for the pcscd patch that I just applied, I'm assuming I should just delete the entry after upgrading to dev (without reverting) as jim mentioned here, correct?

            stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @kevindd992002
              last edited by

              Yes and yes. ๐Ÿ˜‰

              K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kevindd992002 @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 said in Gateway monitor down:

                Yes and yes. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                After updating, I got this crash report error right after logging into the GUI:

                Crash report begins.  Anonymous machine information:
                
                amd64
                12.3-STABLE
                FreeBSD 12.3-STABLE devel-12-n226728-3672bd5377a pfSense
                
                Crash report details:
                
                PHP Errors:
                [27-Dec-2021 18:27:56 UTC] PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'zmq.so' (tried: /usr/local/lib/php/20190902/zmq.so (Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/php/20190902/zmq.so"), /usr/local/lib/php/20190902/zmq.so.so (Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/php/20190902/zmq.so.so")) in Unknown on line 0
                
                
                
                No FreeBSD crash data found.
                

                Is that pretty much expected with snapshots?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  If it was during the update it could well have been since the library version may have been updated resulting in the wrong lib being present at some point.
                  As long as it doesn't return if you remove it a reboot you're fine.

                  Steve

                  K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • K
                    kevindd992002 @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 said in Gateway monitor down:

                    If it was during the update it could well have been since the library version may have been updated resulting in the wrong lib being present at some point.
                    As long as it doesn't return if you remove it a reboot you're fine.

                    Steve

                    Yeah, it didn't show anymore after a reboot so I'm good. Although the upgrade to dev didn't really fix the latency issue, it seems to be better now and I'm still convinced that it's an ISP issue. I'm having a 24ms RTT to 8.8.8.8 now which is ideal but RTTsd is still erratic. What does a high RTTsd mean?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      It means there's a large variation in ping round-trip times. Standard Deviation.

                      Steve

                      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kevindd992002 @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 Right, that I get. But does this usually to translate to an unstable Internet experience?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Probably not, it depends how high you are seeing. But, for exmaple, if all your pings are exactly 10.0ms and then you see one at 10.9 that's going to be a high deviation. You would not notice a 0.9ms change though.

                          Steve

                          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            kevindd992002 @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 said in Gateway monitor down:

                            Probably not, it depends how high you are seeing. But, for exmaple, if all your pings are exactly 10.0ms and then you see one at 10.9 that's going to be a high deviation. You would not notice a 0.9ms change though.

                            Steve

                            Ok, then this is super insane, wouldn't you say?

                            e6afaffe-08f1-42a2-9e7e-741b8b25d490-image.png

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              It's certainly much larger than I would expect. Rttsd values are usually and order or mangnitune less than the actuall RTT time. Like:

                              Name              Monitor                           Source                                  Delay    StdDev  Loss  Status  Substatus
                              BT_DHCP6          fe80::2621:24ff:fed9:623f%pppoe1  fe80::fad1:11ff:fec1:5b57%pppoe1      2.566ms   0.282ms  0.0%  online       none
                              PROTONVPN_VPNV4   10.24.0.1                         10.24.0.9                           227.778ms  60.327ms  0.0%  online      delay
                              WAN2              8.8.4.4                           xx.xxx.xxx.xxx                        3.243ms   0.337ms  0.0%  online       none
                              WAN_PPPOE         8.8.8.8                           yy.yyy.yyy.yy                         6.194ms   0.132ms  0.0%  online       none
                              

                              Are you actually seeing ping spikes to 8.8.4.4?

                              Steve

                              K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                kevindd992002 @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                Right now, I do. But that's probably because there was a recent submarine cable cut in SEA that our ISP is using. The latency problem, however, started happening way before that submarine cable cut issue. I tried using the mtr package and I see the same spikes after 100 pings to each hop.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  Might just be how your link behaves then.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.