Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    66 Posts 4 Posters 4.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      asadz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz no 89 is separate flow, from analysis of etl it means no traffic went outside the box.

      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @asadz
        last edited by

        @asadz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

        t means no traffic went outside the box.

        well answering a client would be outside the box.. you just had the server ask itself for that query?

        But if no traffic went outside - then the server has a record for that.. You need to find out where.. Be it a cache or a actual record you setup..

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          asadz @johnpoz
          last edited by

          @johnpoz its a production DC, i dnt want to install wireshark as it normally requires a reboot, plus the above etl analysis shows zero bytes was exchanged for this IP, so it remain passive, no for entry i need to do some forensic to see where this IP is

          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @asadz
            last edited by

            @asadz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

            wireshark as it normally requires a reboo

            nope never seen it require that.. Have installed it hundreds of time - I have never seen it require a reboot that I can ever remember.

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            A 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              asadz @johnpoz
              last edited by

              @johnpoz
              6.8 is my IP i get after connecting to VPN. The reboot is for npcap driver in case of wireshark. Anyhow, here is the debug logs from the link you shared. I can't make much of it. Seems its resolving requests on its own.

              18.12.2022 20:24:02 1774 PACKET  000002A1016A7D50 UDP Rcv 192.168.6.8     0006   Q [0001   D   NOERROR] A      (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
UDP question info at 000002A1016A7D50
  Socket = 868
  Remote addr 192.168.6.8, port 61364
  Time Query=171623, Queued=0, Expire=0
  Buf length = 0x0fa0 (4000)
  Msg length = 0x0028 (40)
  Message:
    XID       0x0006
    Flags     0x0100
      QR        0 (QUESTION)
      OPCODE    0 (QUERY)
      AA        0
      TC        0
      RD        1
      RA        0
      Z         0
      CD        0
      AD        0
      RCODE     0 (NOERROR)
    QCOUNT    1
    ACOUNT    0
    NSCOUNT   0
    ARCOUNT   0
    QUESTION SECTION:
    Offset = 0x000c, RR count = 0
    Name = (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
      QTYPE   A (1)
      QCLASS  1
    ANSWER SECTION:
      empty
    AUTHORITY SECTION:
      empty
    ADDITIONAL SECTION:
      empty

18.12.2022 20:24:02 1774 PACKET  000002A1007E2960 UDP Snd 192.168.3.7     a4c2   Q [0001   D   NOERROR] A      (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
UDP question info at 000002A1007E2960
  Socket = 13744
  Remote addr 192.168.3.7, port 53
  Time Query=0, Queued=0, Expire=0
  Buf length = 0x0fa0 (4000)
  Msg length = 0x0033 (51)
  Message:
    XID       0xa4c2
    Flags     0x0100
      QR        0 (QUESTION)
      OPCODE    0 (QUERY)
      AA        0
      TC        0
      RD        1
      RA        0
      Z         0
      CD        0
      AD        0
      RCODE     0 (NOERROR)
    QCOUNT    1
    ACOUNT    0
    NSCOUNT   0
    ARCOUNT   1
    QUESTION SECTION:
    Offset = 0x000c, RR count = 0
    Name = (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
      QTYPE   A (1)
      QCLASS  1
    ANSWER SECTION:
      empty
    AUTHORITY SECTION:
      empty
    ADDITIONAL SECTION:
    Offset = 0x0028, RR count = 0
    Name = (0)

18.12.2022 20:24:02 1774 PACKET  000002A10025D0B0 UDP Rcv 192.168.3.7     a4c2 R Q [8081   DR  NOERROR] A      (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
UDP response info at 000002A10025D0B0
  Socket = 13744
  Remote addr 192.168.3.7, port 53
  Time Query=171623, Queued=0, Expire=0
  Buf length = 0x0fa0 (4000)
  Msg length = 0x0043 (67)
  Message:
    XID       0xa4c2
    Flags     0x8180
      QR        1 (RESPONSE)
      OPCODE    0 (QUERY)
      AA        0
      TC        0
      RD        1
      RA        1
      Z         0
      CD        0
      AD        0
      RCODE     0 (NOERROR)
    QCOUNT    1
    ACOUNT    1
    NSCOUNT   0
    ARCOUNT   1
    QUESTION SECTION:
    Offset = 0x000c, RR count = 0
    Name = (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
      QTYPE   A (1)
      QCLASS  1
    ANSWER SECTION:
    Offset = 0x0028, RR count = 0
    Name = [C00C](2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
    AUTHORITY SECTION:
      empty
    ADDITIONAL SECTION:
    Offset = 0x0038, RR count = 0
    Name = (0)

18.12.2022 20:24:02 1774 PACKET  000002A1016A7D50 UDP Snd 192.168.6.8     0006 R Q [8081   DR  NOERROR] A      (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
UDP response info at 000002A1016A7D50
  Socket = 868
  Remote addr 192.168.6.8, port 61364
  Time Query=171623, Queued=171623, Expire=171626
  Buf length = 0x0200 (512)
  Msg length = 0x0038 (56)
  Message:
    XID       0x0006
    Flags     0x8180
      QR        1 (RESPONSE)
      OPCODE    0 (QUERY)
      AA        0
      TC        0
      RD        1
      RA        1
      Z         0
      CD        0
      AD        0
      RCODE     0 (NOERROR)
    QCOUNT    1
    ACOUNT    1
    NSCOUNT   0
    ARCOUNT   0
    QUESTION SECTION:
    Offset = 0x000c, RR count = 0
    Name = (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
      QTYPE   A (1)
      QCLASS  1
    ANSWER SECTION:
    Offset = 0x0028, RR count = 0
    Name = [C00C](2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
    AUTHORITY SECTION:
      empty
    ADDITIONAL SECTION:
      empty

18.12.2022 20:24:03 1774 PACKET  000002A100165910 UDP Rcv 192.168.6.8     0007   Q [0001   D   NOERROR] AAAA   (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
UDP question info at 000002A100165910
  Socket = 868
  Remote addr 192.168.6.8, port 61365
  Time Query=171624, Queued=0, Expire=0
  Buf length = 0x0fa0 (4000)
  Msg length = 0x0028 (40)
  Message:
    XID       0x0007
    Flags     0x0100
      QR        0 (QUESTION)
      OPCODE    0 (QUERY)
      AA        0
      TC        0
      RD        1
      RA        0
      Z         0
      CD        0
      AD        0
      RCODE     0 (NOERROR)
    QCOUNT    1
    ACOUNT    0
    NSCOUNT   0
    ARCOUNT   0
    QUESTION SECTION:
    Offset = 0x000c, RR count = 0
    Name = (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
      QTYPE   AAAA (28)
      QCLASS  1
    ANSWER SECTION:
      empty
    AUTHORITY SECTION:
      empty
    ADDITIONAL SECTION:
      empty

18.12.2022 20:24:03 1774 PACKET  000002A100165910 UDP Snd 192.168.6.8     0007 R Q [8081   DR  NOERROR] AAAA   (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
UDP response info at 000002A100165910
  Socket = 868
  Remote addr 192.168.6.8, port 61365
  Time Query=171624, Queued=0, Expire=0
  Buf length = 0x0200 (512)
  Msg length = 0x005f (95)
  Message:
    XID       0x0007
    Flags     0x8180
      QR        1 (RESPONSE)
      OPCODE    0 (QUERY)
      AA        0
      TC        0
      RD        1
      RA        1
      Z         0
      CD        0
      AD        0
      RCODE     0 (NOERROR)
    QCOUNT    1
    ACOUNT    0
    NSCOUNT   1
    ARCOUNT   0
    QUESTION SECTION:
    Offset = 0x000c, RR count = 0
    Name = (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
      QTYPE   AAAA (28)
      QCLASS  1
    ANSWER SECTION:
      empty
    AUTHORITY SECTION:
    Offset = 0x0028, RR count = 0
    Name = [C00F](15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)
    ADDITIONAL SECTION:
      empty
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                asadz @johnpoz
                last edited by

                @johnpoz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

                @asadz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

                wireshark as it normally requires a reboo

                nope never seen it require that.. Have installed it hundreds of time - I have never seen it require a reboot that I can ever remember.

                I found interesting thing , when i parsed log using
                https://github.com/AleksandrReznik/DNSdebugLogParser

                for correctly resolved local domains I get ldap as

                Name = (5)_ldap(4)_tcp(6)VM-DC2(10)dummy(5)local(0)

                where as for scorecardsearch it is
                ```
                Name = (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(0)

                it doesn't include the _ldap, meaning it doesn't look at local directory ldap for
                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  asadz @asadz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz also the ANSWER SECTION is empty, which is very strange.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    asadz @johnpoz
                    last edited by asadz

                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      asadz @johnpoz
                      last edited by

                      @johnpoz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

                      @asadz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

                      wireshark as it normally requires a reboo

                      nope never seen it require that.. Have installed it hundreds of time - I have never seen it require a reboot that I can ever remember.

                      Also in logs i found

                      18.12.2022 18:07:03 13F4 PACKET  000002A17EC0D4E0 UDP Rcv 192.168.3.6     0002   Q [0001   D   NOERROR] A      (2)sb(15)scorecardsearch(3)com(10)mydomain(5)local(0)

                      why it would append the suffix for external hostnames, in log this append was not done for any external hostnames, perhaps it consider itself to be authoritative NS, when in reality it is not?

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        asadz @asadz
                        last edited by

                        @asadz Problem solved it was sunnyvalley ngfw (integerated with pfsense) which was doing the blacklisting, the way it did was intriguing as it re-writing the socket the response with a different mac address. The pcap at client always showed A query response from DC, but actually it was coming from ngfw firewall which was injecting the response with backhole address.

                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @asadz
                          last edited by

                          @asadz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

                          with backhole address.

                          of 100.1.2.4 ? that is a HORRIBLE blackhole choice that is for sure..

                          A simple wireshark would of seen right away that answer was coming from a different mac address, etc.

                          Again if the DC was putting traffic on the wire, would of seen that and know from upstream something was returning the 100.x address.

                          Glad you found it.. but using a valid public IP, ie 100.1.2.4 is horrible horrible choice of blackhole address.. Maybe it was a typo and was suppose to be 10.1.2.4?

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            asadz @johnpoz
                            last edited by asadz

                            @johnpoz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

                            @asadz said in Unable to illegal DNS record from pfsense (DNS-resolver corruption):

                            with backhole address.

                            of 100.1.2.4 ? that is a HORRIBLE blackhole choice that is for sure..

                            A simple wireshark would of seen right away that answer was coming from a different mac address, etc.

                            Again if the DC was putting traffic on the wire, would of seen that and know from upstream something was returning the 100.x address.

                            Glad you found it.. but using a valid public IP, ie 100.1.2.4 is horrible horrible choice of blackhole address.. Maybe it was a typo and was suppose to be 10.1.2.4?

                            Yes I share your concerns, this IP made it first appearance in var/log of pfsense of 14th same day we enabled new snort rules
                            The DNS reply logs

                            Dec 14 14:31:08,reply,A,A,Unk,sb.scorecardresearch.com,192.168.3.6,100.2.3.4,USDNS-reply,Dec 14 14:31:08,reply,A,A,Unk,sb.scorecardresearch.com,192.168.4.9,100.2.3.4,USDNS-reply

                            Suggest sunnyvalley providing black hole response. I still think black hole address should be private to be safe and esp should not resolve or routable to www.

                            Also the MAC address lookup shows 0050560B0310 -> 00005E000101
                            One is register with VMware other is IANA. Most probably sunnyvalley cloud app is running over VMware.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.