Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Report a Bug.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    34 Posts 3 Posters 4.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      e0x @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10

      @stephenw10 said in Report a Bug.:

      What is this hardware?

      Captura de pantalla 2023-07-26 112758.png

      @stephenw10 said in Report a Bug.:

      I would try replacing or removing the dc NIC if you can.

      Ok. I will be back to report if everything is working, thank you very much.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        But is this a desktop device? A networking appliance? This is the boot log looks all wrong:

        nfe0: <NVIDIA nForce MCP61 Networking Adapter> port 0xc080-0xc087 mem 0xeedfd000-0xeedfdfff irq 20 at device 7.0 on pci0
miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0
rlphy0: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 0 on miibus1
rlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy1: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1
rlphy1:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy2: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 2 on miibus1
rlphy2:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy3: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 3 on miibus1
rlphy3:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy4: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 4 on miibus1
rlphy4:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy5: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 5 on miibus1
rlphy5:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy6: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 6 on miibus1
rlphy6:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy7: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 7 on miibus1
rlphy7:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy8: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 8 on miibus1
rlphy8:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy9: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 9 on miibus1
rlphy9:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy10: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 10 on miibus1
rlphy10:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy11: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 11 on miibus1
rlphy11:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy12: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 12 on miibus1
rlphy12:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy13: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 13 on miibus1
rlphy13:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy14: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 14 on miibus1
rlphy14:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy15: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 15 on miibus1
rlphy15:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy16: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 16 on miibus1
rlphy16:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy17: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 17 on miibus1
rlphy17:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy18: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 18 on miibus1
rlphy18:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy19: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 19 on miibus1
rlphy19:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy20: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 20 on miibus1
rlphy20:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy21: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 21 on miibus1
rlphy21:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy22: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 22 on miibus1
rlphy22:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy23: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 23 on miibus1
rlphy23:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy24: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 24 on miibus1
rlphy24:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy25: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 25 on miibus1
rlphy25:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy26: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 26 on miibus1
rlphy26:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy27: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 27 on miibus1
rlphy27:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy28: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 28 on miibus1
rlphy28:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy29: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 29 on miibus1
rlphy29:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy30: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 30 on miibus1
rlphy30:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
rlphy31: <RTL8201L 10/100 media interface> PHY 31 on miibus1
rlphy31:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto, auto-flow
<6>nfe0: Ethernet address: bc:5f:f4:7b:8d:ff

        It sees 32 Realtek PHYs on that nfe MAC. I've never seen anything like that and it's hard to imagine it's accurate. I assume this does not have 32 Ethernet ports?

        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • E
          e0x @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10

          @stephenw10 said in Report a Bug.:

          I assume this does not have 32 Ethernet ports?

          Only 2.

          @stephenw10 said in Report a Bug.:

          But is this a desktop device?

          Yes.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Ok, then both those NICs appear to be buggy but the dc(4) driver is known to have issues so I'd replace that first.

            E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • E
              e0x @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 The ENF656-ESW-NDPR V1.1 will be ok?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                That looks like a 56K modem, so almost certainly not what you want and it probably not supported anyway.

                E 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • E
                  e0x @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 RTL8139D(L)?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    e0x @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 I have a very old computer for this, can I put a link for a store from my country for best help? I don't know if put a link of an online store is accepted here, so I ask just in case.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      That will probably work but it's still an old NIC that isn't really that great.

                      Use Intel based NICs if you possibly can.

                      E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E
                        e0x @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 Only find intel ether Express Pro100 Smart adaptor for a reasonable price.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Well that probably would work but it's also an old 100M NIC.

                          E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • E
                            e0x @stephenw10
                            last edited by e0x

                            @stephenw10 thanks, but I have only 50 mb of internet, so I suppose is ok, not?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Probably be fine then. 😉

                              E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • E
                                e0x @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                @stephenw10 Also found bic2se Model 315-0610020esa, but I don't find any documentation for that card.

                                Captura de pantalla 2023-07-26 185340.png
                                Captura de pantalla 2023-07-26 185353.png

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  Yeah, I have no idea if that would work. And it's SFP so added complexity. And possibly fibre channel only which wouldn't work.

                                  E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • E
                                    e0x @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10 the NC3121?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Looks like an Intel NIC so I'd expect it to work. I've never tested it myself though.

                                      E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • E
                                        e0x @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10 Hi again! The networks adapters are the real problem (1 from the motherboard and other pci) that don't let me update to 2.7? I ask this because I want to be sure to changing the nics all will be work fine.

                                        Thanks.

                                        All the best.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Well the crash you posted is in the dc driver so if you remove that NIC it can't happen.

                                          You only need one NIC to test it though so try installing 2.7 with only the on-board nfe NIC.

                                          E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • E
                                            e0x @stephenw10
                                            last edited by

                                            @stephenw10 Hi! I replace the dc0 for an intel nic and can upgrade to 2.7 successful. Thanks a lot!
                                            All the best.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.