Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Port Forward does not work..

    Firewalling
    help nat nat rules firewall firewall rules
    5
    71
    12.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      root1ng LAYER 8 @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz said in Port Forward does not work..:

      @root1ng I don't see any hits on either of those rules that allow for your port forwards to port 9987 and 30033

      First step in troubleshooting a port forward or any wan side firewall rule is validate the traffic actually gets to pfsense, go to like can you see me . org and send some traffic. Be it you allow it or forward it or not.. You should see that traffic in your packet capture.

      For example just sent some traffic to port 9987 like your forward, as you can see from packet capture on my wan pfsense actually sees this traffic.

      If pfsense never sees the traffic no amount of firewall rules or forwards would ever work.

      30033 TCP seems to work, 9987 UDP doesn't and I don't understand why, all ports are open from ISP

      Screenshot_1.png
      Screenshot_2.png
      Screenshot_3.png

      V Bob.DigB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • V
        viragomann @root1ng
        last edited by

        @root1ng
        The port checker might only be able to do TCP checks.

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Bob.DigB
          Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @root1ng
          last edited by

          @root1ng said in Port Forward does not work..:

          30033 TCP seems to work,

          That does look good.

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            root1ng LAYER 8 @Bob.Dig
            last edited by

            @Bob-Dig said in Port Forward does not work..:

            That does look good

            Yes, but the main one is 9987 .. and for now it still doesn't work.

            Bob.DigB V 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Bob.DigB
              Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @root1ng
              last edited by Bob.Dig

              @root1ng said in Port Forward does not work..:

              Yes, but the main one is 9987 .. and for now it still doesn't work.

              Maybe your proxmox Firewall is blocking UDP?

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                root1ng LAYER 8 @Bob.Dig
                last edited by

                @Bob-Dig said in Port Forward does not work..:

                Maybe your proxmox Firewall is blocking UDP?

                All firewalls are disabled.. tell me where to check and I'll come back

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V
                  viragomann @root1ng
                  last edited by

                  @root1ng said in Port Forward does not work..:

                  Yes, but the main one is 9987 .. and for now it still doesn't work.

                  As long as there is no service listening on this port at TCP, the access won't succeed naturally.
                  Your backend is listening at UDP 9987 and UDP probably cannot be probed with the port checker.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    root1ng LAYER 8 @viragomann
                    last edited by

                    @viragomann said in Port Forward does not work..:

                    As long as there is no service listening on this port at TCP, the access won't succeed naturally.
                    Your backend is listening at UDP 9987 and UDP probably cannot be probed with the port checker.

                    I changed from UDP to TCP and I still can't access it with the port checker, I still get a timeout.

                    V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V
                      viragomann @root1ng
                      last edited by

                      @root1ng
                      On the backend? And does it work from inside with TCP?

                      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R
                        root1ng LAYER 8 @viragomann
                        last edited by

                        @viragomann said in Port Forward does not work..:

                        @root1ng
                        On the backend? And does it work from inside with TCP?

                        Not working ..

                        V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • V
                          viragomann @root1ng
                          last edited by

                          @root1ng
                          So I don“t expect it to work from outside.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @viragomann
                            last edited by johnpoz

                            @viragomann said in Port Forward does not work..:

                            The port checker might only be able to do TCP checks.

                            Yeah can you see me can only do TCP.. you would have to use something that can send udp..

                            Here is one..

                            https://www.ipvoid.com/udp-port-scan/

                            udp.jpg

                            But if when testing and tcp gets there via packet capture - its a good sign that udp is open as well. But yeah its never bad idea to actually validate

                            My bad for not noticing 9987 was setup for udp..

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                            R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              root1ng LAYER 8 @johnpoz
                              last edited by

                              @johnpoz said in Port Forward does not work..:

                              @viragomann said in Port Forward does not work..:

                              The port checker might only be able to do TCP checks.

                              Yeah can you see me can only do TCP.. you would have to use something that can send udp..

                              Here is one..

                              https://www.ipvoid.com/udp-port-scan/

                              udp.jpg

                              But if when testing and tcp gets there via packet capture - its a good sign that udp is open as well. But yeah its never bad idea to actually validate

                              My bad for not noticing 9987 was setup for udp..

                              In the packet capture log, only 30033 appears with the public ip, 9987 appears open on the last tool provided by you but does not appear in the log, I don't understand why it doesn't work

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                root1ng LAYER 8 @johnpoz
                                last edited by

                                @johnpoz

                                Screenshot_4.png

                                It seems that it finally appears, but I still can't connect to the teamspeak server using the public ip

                                V johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • V
                                  viragomann @root1ng
                                  last edited by

                                  @root1ng
                                  Sniffing the traffic is the way to investigate this and to nail down the issue.
                                  Run a capture on the WAN. If you can see the expected packets there, run a capture on the LAN side.

                                  However, it's required to know, which packets this service requires to work before.

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • johnpozJ
                                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @root1ng
                                    last edited by johnpoz

                                    @root1ng where did you sniff that - on the lan side interface of pfsense I have to assume because its already been forwarded to the 172.16 address. So pfsense did its thing.

                                    Why your 172.16 doesn't answer could be lot of things, its not actually listening on that port, it has a firewall running not allowing it. Your sending to the wrong IP completely.

                                    That device is not using pfsense as its gateway. But if your seeing traffic sent on from pfsense to the IP you want, and the port then its not pfsense issue.. Look to your device, or something else downstream in your network that could prevent that device from seeing the traffic.

                                    Users all the time forget about host firewalls.. The only job pfsense has in this is sending it on to where you say to send it on too, if that device doesn't answer that is not a pfsense problem..

                                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      root1ng LAYER 8 @viragomann
                                      last edited by

                                      @viragomann said in Port Forward does not work..:

                                      Sniffing the traffic is the way to investigate this and to nail down the issue.
                                      Run a capture on the WAN. If you can see the expected packets there, run a capture on the LAN side.

                                      However, it's required to know, which packets this service requires to work before.

                                      I came back with the log for WAN and LAN, I see that it responds to both, is it ok?

                                      WAN:

                                      wan-tcp.png wan-udp.png

                                      LAN:

                                      lan-tcp.png lan-udp.png

                                      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • johnpozJ
                                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @root1ng
                                        last edited by johnpoz

                                        @root1ng where do you see 172.16.1.6 respond with traffic to its 9987 port?

                                        where.jpg

                                        I don't see a response to 192.241.153.165 port 53781 in what you posted.

                                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • R
                                          root1ng LAYER 8 @johnpoz
                                          last edited by

                                          @johnpoz said in Port Forward does not work..:

                                          @root1ng where do you see 172.16.1.6 respond with traffic to its 9987 port?

                                          I don't see a response to 192.241.153.165 port 53781 in what you posted.

                                          Yes, you are right, I checked once more and there is nothing from me to that ip, only from him to me.. I don't know what else to do, do you think you could help me by sharing or teamviewer?

                                          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • johnpozJ
                                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @root1ng
                                            last edited by

                                            @root1ng if you see traffic sent to that IP.. Check on that device that actually listening. Netstat -an will show you ports being listened on.

                                            for example

                                            listen.jpg

                                            Some udp ports my windows box is listening on.. Do you see that 9987 listed?

                                            do a packet capture on the device, wireshark is free and 2 seconds to install, etc..

                                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.