Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS Forwarder Custom Options always gives "Invalid custom options"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    33 Posts 4 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      blaize @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz

      Man page says this:

      --server=[/[<domain>]/[domain/]][<server>[#<port>]][@<interface>][@<source-ip>[#<port>]]

      @interface is the name of the interface.

      But that's not the problem. It doesn't matter what I put in. I get that "not valid" error message.

      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @blaize
        last edited by johnpoz

        @blaize vtnet0 that is a proxmox thing is it not? That is sure not an interface name you would see on pfsense on hardware.

        As @stephenw10 showed it works with that simple max-ttl=30 command.. And it works for me using your command and a source IP. Guess I could try it with the interface name.

        So it is not working with interface name on 2.7.2, I tried with actual interface name em0, tried with LAN, etc. But that server option works just fine IP address. Possible pfsense is only parsing for IP and not the interface name?

        But your saying you can not even get max-ttl=30 working. Where the option box is clear and and only the max-ttl=30 in there?

        [2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@test.mydomain.tld]/root: ps -auxwd | grep dnsmasq
        nobody  3335   0.0  0.5  17900  4568  -  I    23:16   0:00.00 |-- /usr/local/sbin/dnsmasq -C /dev/null --no-resolv --all-servers --max-ttl=30 --server=8.8.8.8@192.168.9.34 --dns-forward-max=5
        root   55093   0.0  0.0    436   264  0  R+   23:17   0:00.00 |       `-- grep dnsmasq
        [2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@test.mydomain.tld]/root: 
        

        I can't duplicate that problem, it works with max-ttl=30 no problem.. But yeah its not taking name for the interface, but it works with IP just fine.

        Not sure why your having issues with just the max-ttl, I tried adding spaces in front, after and it still worked, blank line in front even. Your on 2.7.2 right.. Yeah that is what running test on..

        Shows its running

        [2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@test.mydomain.tld]/root: dnsmasq -v
        Dnsmasq version 2.89  Copyright (c) 2000-2022 Simon Kelley
        

        I tired running the command manually

        [2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@test.mydomain.tld]/root: /usr/local/sbin/dnsmasq -C /dev/null --no-resolv --all-servers --max-ttl=30 --server=8.8.8.8@em0 --dns-forward-max=5
        
        dnsmasq: bad command line options: interface binding not supported
        

        And it doesn't like using name.. But if use IP it takes it

        [2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@test.mydomain.tld]/root: /usr/local/sbin/dnsmasq -C /dev/null --no-resolv --all-servers --max-ttl=30 --server=8.8.8.8@192.168.9.34 --dns-forward-max=5
        [2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@test.mydomain.tld]/root: 
        

        That sort of says it not just a parsing of the options box issue.

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Mmm, that looks like the issue.

          But even if it did work that option would simply tell dnsmasq to use em0 when connecting out to 8.8.8.8. It does not tell it to forward queries from em0 to 8.8.8.8.

          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 true, but just because option doesn't do what he thought it did is not really relevant to his issue. Curious what he has going on that he can't do max-ttl even? Unless he hasn't really tried that all by itself?

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              blaize @johnpoz
              last edited by

              @johnpoz @stephenw10

              I think it is a bug. I stopped the daemon in the UI and ran the command in the console like it supposed to be my adding --max-ttl to the command.

              /usr/local/sbin/dnsmasq -C /dev/null --rebind-localhost-ok --stop-dns-rebind --no-resolv --server=2600:1701:44d:6000::1 --server=192.168.1.254 --all-servers --dns-forward-max=5000 --cache-size=10000 --local-ttl=1 --max-ttl=30

              Works fine. Something about the UI is not taking that parameter. It does not appear to be an issue with dnsmasq per se, rather the UI/backend trying to validate the option before starting the daemon.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                blaize @johnpoz
                last edited by

                @johnpoz All that to say, the --server parameter is supposed to specify the upstream server for a filter (ip address, domain name, interface, etc.) while everything else is local unless you suppress it. According to the docs:

                "Specify upstream servers directly. Setting this flag does not suppress reading of /etc/resolv.conf, use --no-resolv to do that. If one or more optional domains are given, that server is used only for those domains and they are queried only using the specified server. This is intended for private nameservers: if you have a nameserver on your network which deals with names of the form xxx.internal.thekelleys.org.uk at 192.168.1.1 then giving the flag --server=/internal.thekelleys.org.uk/192.168.1.1 will send all queries for internal machines to that nameserver, everything else will go to the servers in /etc/resolv.conf."

                But as I said, my problem looks more like an issue with the UI itself. I'm not sure what's going on there.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by stephenw10

                  What exactly does your custom options field look like? I can't replicate the issue here in 2.7.2.

                  johnpozJ B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 nor can I.. And I tried all kinds of weirdness in how I put max-ttl=30 in the box.. blank lines before it, spaces before and after it etc.. It always took it just fine.

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      blaize @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 Here's the screenshots.

                      max-ttl=30.png max-ttl=30b.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Hmm, some rogue character in there?

                        Some other odd combination of options?

                        What does it look like in the config:

                        	<dnsmasq>
                        		<enable></enable>
                        		<port>5353</port>
                        		<interface></interface>
                        		<custom_options>bWF4LXR0bD0zMA==</custom_options>
                        	</dnsmasq>
                        

                        You probably don't have the custom options value as it sees it as invalid when adding it.

                        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B
                          blaize @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 It doesn't save it between attempts.

                          I thought it might be a random character or something like that, which is why I tried other browsers. It doesn't seem to be a browser issue though.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Then I can only imagine it's conflicting with some other option you have set.

                            Is that line you posted above the actual command that's run by your config?

                            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              blaize @stephenw10
                              last edited by blaize

                              @stephenw10

                              This is the generated line:

                              /usr/local/sbin/dnsmasq -C /dev/null --rebind-localhost-ok --stop-dns-rebind --no-resolv --server=2600:1701:44d:6000::1 --server=192.168.1.254 --all-servers --dns-forward-max=5000 --cache-size=10000 --local-ttl=1

                              This is the one I created:

                              /usr/local/sbin/dnsmasq -C /dev/null --rebind-localhost-ok --stop-dns-rebind --no-resolv --server=2600:1701:44d:6000::1 --server=192.168.1.254 --all-servers --dns-forward-max=5000 --cache-size=10000 --local-ttl=1 --max-ttl=30

                              Both of these work

                              The only thing difference is max-ttl. I don't think this has anything to do with dnsmasq.

                              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • johnpozJ
                                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @blaize
                                last edited by

                                @blaize said in DNS Forwarder Custom Options always gives "Invalid custom options":

                                The only thing difference is max-ttl. I don't think this has anything to do with dnsmasq.

                                That is a valid dnsmasq option

                                --max-ttl=<time>
                                Set a maximum TTL value that will be handed out to clients. The specified maximum TTL will be given to clients instead of the true TTL value if it is lower. The true TTL value is however kept in the cache to avoid flooding the upstream DNS servers.

                                dnsmasq --help | grep max-ttl
                                    --max-ttl=<integer>                                Specify time-to-live in seconds for maximum TTL to send to clients.
                                

                                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  You have the <dnsmasq> config section generating that?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    blaize @johnpoz
                                    last edited by

                                    @johnpoz @stephenw10

                                    It doesn't matter what I put in the text box. It gives me the error. I was using the max-ttl option just to eliminate the variables. I put it on the the command line to make sure it was not a problem with dnsmasq. It really seems like something between validation for the custom options and starting the daemon.

                                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @blaize
                                      last edited by

                                      @blaize what do you show in the xml for dnsmasq - like @stephenw10 example above.

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A
                                        Antibiotic @blaize
                                        last edited by

                                        @blaize The corresponding fix seems easy enough for a patch:

                                        https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/aac5bb5d396a1f1b18d59a532ad262a4d1085a40/diff

                                        pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                                        CPU: Intel N100
                                        NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                                        RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                                        Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                                        Brgds, Archi

                                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • johnpozJ
                                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Antibiotic
                                          last edited by

                                          @Antibiotic said in DNS Forwarder Custom Options always gives "Invalid custom options":

                                          ttps://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/aac5bb5d396a1f1b18d59a532ad262a4d1085a40/diff

                                          huh - how is that related to reading a custom options entry? That is about domain overrides.

                                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stephenw10S
                                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                            last edited by

                                            @Antibiotic said in DNS Forwarder Custom Options always gives "Invalid custom options":

                                            https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/aac5bb5d396a1f1b18d59a532ad262a4d1085a40/diff

                                            Mmm, seems unrelated.

                                            But I do have all the recommended patches applied on the 2.7.2 box I'm testing on which might be a difference. I don't see anything dnsmasq related there but....

                                            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.