Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS Forwarder Custom Options always gives "Invalid custom options"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    33 Posts 4 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      blaize @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 Here's the screenshots.

      max-ttl=30.png max-ttl=30b.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Hmm, some rogue character in there?

        Some other odd combination of options?

        What does it look like in the config:

        	<dnsmasq>
        		<enable></enable>
        		<port>5353</port>
        		<interface></interface>
        		<custom_options>bWF4LXR0bD0zMA==</custom_options>
        	</dnsmasq>
        

        You probably don't have the custom options value as it sees it as invalid when adding it.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          blaize @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 It doesn't save it between attempts.

          I thought it might be a random character or something like that, which is why I tried other browsers. It doesn't seem to be a browser issue though.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Then I can only imagine it's conflicting with some other option you have set.

            Is that line you posted above the actual command that's run by your config?

            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              blaize @stephenw10
              last edited by blaize

              @stephenw10

              This is the generated line:

              /usr/local/sbin/dnsmasq -C /dev/null --rebind-localhost-ok --stop-dns-rebind --no-resolv --server=2600:1701:44d:6000::1 --server=192.168.1.254 --all-servers --dns-forward-max=5000 --cache-size=10000 --local-ttl=1

              This is the one I created:

              /usr/local/sbin/dnsmasq -C /dev/null --rebind-localhost-ok --stop-dns-rebind --no-resolv --server=2600:1701:44d:6000::1 --server=192.168.1.254 --all-servers --dns-forward-max=5000 --cache-size=10000 --local-ttl=1 --max-ttl=30

              Both of these work

              The only thing difference is max-ttl. I don't think this has anything to do with dnsmasq.

              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @blaize
                last edited by

                @blaize said in DNS Forwarder Custom Options always gives "Invalid custom options":

                The only thing difference is max-ttl. I don't think this has anything to do with dnsmasq.

                That is a valid dnsmasq option

                --max-ttl=<time>
                Set a maximum TTL value that will be handed out to clients. The specified maximum TTL will be given to clients instead of the true TTL value if it is lower. The true TTL value is however kept in the cache to avoid flooding the upstream DNS servers.

                dnsmasq --help | grep max-ttl
                    --max-ttl=<integer>                                Specify time-to-live in seconds for maximum TTL to send to clients.
                

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  You have the <dnsmasq> config section generating that?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    blaize @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz @stephenw10

                    It doesn't matter what I put in the text box. It gives me the error. I was using the max-ttl option just to eliminate the variables. I put it on the the command line to make sure it was not a problem with dnsmasq. It really seems like something between validation for the custom options and starting the daemon.

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @blaize
                      last edited by

                      @blaize what do you show in the xml for dnsmasq - like @stephenw10 example above.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        Antibiotic @blaize
                        last edited by

                        @blaize The corresponding fix seems easy enough for a patch:

                        https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/aac5bb5d396a1f1b18d59a532ad262a4d1085a40/diff

                        pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                        CPU: Intel N100
                        NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                        RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                        Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                        Brgds, Archi

                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Antibiotic
                          last edited by

                          @Antibiotic said in DNS Forwarder Custom Options always gives "Invalid custom options":

                          ttps://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/aac5bb5d396a1f1b18d59a532ad262a4d1085a40/diff

                          huh - how is that related to reading a custom options entry? That is about domain overrides.

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            @Antibiotic said in DNS Forwarder Custom Options always gives "Invalid custom options":

                            https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/aac5bb5d396a1f1b18d59a532ad262a4d1085a40/diff

                            Mmm, seems unrelated.

                            But I do have all the recommended patches applied on the 2.7.2 box I'm testing on which might be a difference. I don't see anything dnsmasq related there but....

                            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              blaize @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 I can't say that I have the latest patches. I run the updates on the UI pretty frequently and it says I'm up to date.

                              2.7.2-RELEASE (amd64)
                              built on Mon Mar 4 14:53:00 EST 2024
                              FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT

                              The system is on the latest version.
                              Version information updated at Thu Dec 19 12:27:08 EST 2024

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                I'm referring to the recommends patches list in the System Patches package. I can't see anything there that should make any difference to dnsmasq but it's worth trying.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.