Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    What is wrong with this 2100 switch configuration?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    20 Posts 4 Posters 483 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      DominikHoffmann @patient0
      last edited by

      @patient0: First of all, thank you very much for your willingness to dig into my issue with me!

      Yes, all the ports on the switch are set to PVID 1:

      Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 5.09.34 PM.png

      The table is scrollable, and when I scroll down PVID = 1 for all of the switch ports.

      This is my new configuration in Interfaces → Switch → VLANs now looks like this:

      Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 5.14.10 PM.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        DominikHoffmann
        last edited by

        Additionally, I just did another test. I configured my MacBook Pro’s Belkin USB-C to Ethernet adapter to untag traffic with VLAN ID 39 and hooked it up to Switch Port 2 on the 2100 directly. This eliminates the TP-Link switch and UniFi Wi-Fi equipment from the equation. With that simplified setup I still cannot get to the internet from my guest network.

        patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • patient0P
          patient0 @DominikHoffmann
          last edited by

          @DominikHoffmann said in What is wrong with this 2100 switch configuration?:

          I configured my MacBook Pro’s Belkin USB-C to Ethernet adapter to untag traffic with VLAN ID 39 and hooked it up to Switch Port 2 on the 2100 directly.

          Now the switch config does indeed look good.

          Am I right to assume that the normal LAN (untagged VLAN1) does work with the Belkin USB-C ethernet adapter.

          Can you access the internet and the router if you set the IP,subnet, router and DNS manually for the VLAN ID 39?

          Just to make sure: And you created the VLAN 39 on the macOS by creating a VLAN in System Settings / Network, Manage Virtual Interfaces > New VLAN, set tag and select the Belkin USB-C adapter.

          First of all, thank you very much for your willingness to dig into my issue with me!

          Same goes for you for keeping on it, it certainly takes a quite a bit time, more then one thinks it should.

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Ok that 2100 switch config should work for a directly connected connected tagged client like that.

            So do you have VLAN 39 defined as an interface? Does it have dhcp running on it? Did your test client pull a lease in the correct subnet?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • D
              DominikHoffmann @patient0
              last edited by

              @patient0 said in What is wrong with this 2100 switch configuration?:

              Now the switch config does indeed look good.

              Thanks very much for confirming!

              Am I right to assume that the normal LAN (untagged VLAN1) does work with the Belkin USB-C ethernet adapter.

              Yes, it does.

              Can you access the internet and the router if you set the IP,subnet, router and DNS manually for the VLAN ID 39?

              I don’t think that’s necessary, as my laptop pulls an IP address, router and DNS.

              Just to make sure: And you created the VLAN 39 on the macOS by creating a VLAN in System Settings / Network, Manage Virtual Interfaces > New VLAN, set tag and select the Belkin USB-C adapter.

              I did.

              @stephenw10 said in What is wrong with this 2100 switch configuration?:

              So do you have VLAN 39 defined as an interface? Does it have dhcp running on it? Did your test client pull a lease in the correct subnet?

              Yes, yes and yes.

              Still no cigar!

              patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • patient0P
                patient0 @DominikHoffmann
                last edited by patient0

                @DominikHoffmann said in What is wrong with this 2100 switch configuration?:

                I don’t think that’s necessary, as my laptop pulls an IP address, router and DNS.

                Oh, I see, I thought you didn't get an IP.

                DHCP is working but you can't get to the internet. Is the captive portal still active (I have no knowledge about that, never used it) and if yes can you authenticate successfully?

                And you can ping the pfSense/gateway? Can you ping an external IP address? Does DNS resolution work?

                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • D
                  DominikHoffmann @patient0
                  last edited by

                  @patient0 said in What is wrong with this 2100 switch configuration?:

                  And you can ping the pfSense/gateway? Can you ping an external IP address? Does DNS resolution work?

                  I cannot ping it.

                  I don’t think, I ever checked, whether the captive portal is the culprit. I will do so this afternoon.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Yup if it pulls a dhcp lease in the correct subnet but cannot even ping the pfSense interface address then it must be a firewall rule or the captive portal.

                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • D
                      DominikHoffmann @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10: Yes, it was the captive portal. Now I have to figure out what’s wrong with the configuration…

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • D DominikHoffmann referenced this topic
                      • D
                        DominikHoffmann
                        last edited by

                        Indeed, I have to consult the community on how to configure the captive portal, too.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.