Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Bandwidth share evenly by ip?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    12 Posts 5 Posters 6.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      casinmirad
      last edited by

      You can use the limiters tab in Traffic Shapping for that.

      http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Traffic_Shaping_Guide#Limiter

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        aba3k
        last edited by

        I didn't understand how to assign the traffic, is something like this?
        http://yfrog.com/eh63308175j - limiter pipe
        http://yfrog.com/3r43102428j - assign traffic

        Pfsense says there are some errors involving the creation of the rules

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          eri--
          last edited by

          Enable the limiter in the screenshot.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            aba3k
            last edited by

            I still get a error: dummynet cannot be specified without directions

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              eri--
              last edited by

              What rule are you trying to create?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                aba3k
                last edited by

                This rule http://yfrog.com/3r43102428j
                I don't know if I'm creating correctly

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  ttlinna
                  last edited by

                  @aba3k:

                  Is possible using 2.0? Can someone help me achieving this?

                  To the developers: How about implementing E-SFQ disciplines?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    eri--
                    last edited by

                    @aba3k: incomplete screenshot.

                    @ttlinna: you know what are you talking about? Or you just read the headlines somewhere!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T
                      ttlinna
                      last edited by

                      @ermal:

                      @ttlinna: you know what are you talking about? Or you just read the headlines somewhere!

                      I'm sorry, but as far as I understood, with E-SFQ you can share bandwidth evenly among different users.

                      I tihnk there are some commercial products using this discipline for that purpose.

                      Please correct me, if I am wrong.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        clarknova
                        last edited by

                        The problem with pfsense's limiters for this application is that they don't do anything for you on a congested link. It's great that I can limit every client to 10mbps when my WAN is 40mbps, but what happens when 10 clients all start grabbing the latest WoW or Steam update, or Ubuntu 11.04 beta?

                        I'm not familiar with E-SFQ, but I know the sfq queuing discipline in Linux is designed to balance the link across all active stream (which is maybe moot anyway, as we want to balance clients, not sessions).

                        db

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          eri--
                          last edited by

                          Well in pfSense you can only balance clients AND IT IS POSSIBLE.
                          With limiters you can balance sessions too if you want but its not exported on the GUI.

                          For what is worth you can use queues in combination iwth limiters to achieve best traffic QoS.
                          Like limit every client with limiters but prioritizing ACKs in the  link etc…

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.