Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Configuring CARP with Multiple WAN connections

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    HA/CARP/VIPs
    2
    13
    3.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      sterfry1988
      last edited by

      I have 2 PePlinks  acting as wan aggregators and then 2 PFsense boxes running 2.1 acting as routing DHCP and VLAN management.

      My questions is around the WAN side of the setup. is a WAN VIP required for CARP? I am having trouble configuring what this topology looks like this http://i.imgur.com/dqffEab.png

      Do the wan aggregators need to have different subnets?  how would a VIP work in this scenario?

      Thanks for the input.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        miloman
        last edited by

        is a WAN VIP required for CARP?

        yes, if you always need to source from the same wan ip.
        no if you just need to failover to the secondary firewall. (you still need carp on all lan interfaces)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sterfry1988
          last edited by

          @miloman:

          no if you just need to failover to the secondary firewall. (you still need carp on all lan interfaces)

          I set CARP up on my LAN interface, but under the CARP status page it shows both Firewalls status as MASTER.

          Should I be able to ping the carp interface on FW2 from FW1?

          For example:

          Carpinterface on FW1 is 10.10.10.1
          Carpinterface on FW2 is 10.10.10.2

          Should I be able to ping 10.10.10.2 from the LAN on FW1 ?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            miloman
            last edited by

            I set CARP up on my LAN interface, but under the CARP status page it shows both Firewalls status as MASTER.

            then your firewalls can't see each other, and they both think they should be master. are they physical or virtual?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              sterfry1988
              last edited by

              The firewalls are both physical they are Dell poweredge 2950's.

              I added a PASS rule in each FW's carp interface, do I need to add a similar rule on the other interfaces?

              How can they sync all the rules/settings if they can't see each other? I am also able to ping the other FW from the ping utility if I select my source interface as the carp interface.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                miloman
                last edited by

                It's on the lan interface they can't see each other… Smetimes i have to boot the secondary firewall after the initial carp configuration. Have you tried that?

                Can you ping the primary firewalls lan ip from the secondary firewall?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  sterfry1988
                  last edited by

                  Apparently after a night of my rig sitting they are now appearing as "Backup" and "Master" appropriately. I can reach the primary and backup IPs from LAN and if I connect to the VIP it directs to the MASTER fw.

                  All I have to do now is add a VIP for each of my VLANs right? and then the VLANs should fail over too ? Each FW is connected to it's own WAN aggregator with to a different ISP I don't think I need to create a VIP for the WAN, what is your advice here?

                  Thanks for all your insight and advice.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    miloman
                    last edited by

                    All I have to do now is add a VIP for each of my VLANs right?

                    Yep…

                    Your traffic will source from your firewalls wan ip. If you need it to always source from the same ip, then you need a carp wan ip and manually configure outgoing nat.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      sterfry1988
                      last edited by

                      Any advice on routing?

                      I am able to ping anything internally but can't reach the internet

                      A traceroute to www.google.com will show the MASTER FW IP responding twice and then ending like this

                      1 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2)  0.232 ms  0.236 ms  0.219 ms
                      2  10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2)  0.234 ms !H  0.231 ms !H  0.238 ms !H

                      My virtual IP is 10.0.0.1 and the slave ip is 10.0.0.3

                      I updated the DNS and Gateway in the DHCP server settings to be the virtual IP.

                      I can also ping what should be the next hop 10.37.7.1 ( the wan aggregator) but as you can see from traceroute the route is not quite right.

                      Thanks

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        miloman
                        last edited by

                        Please post your config or network diagram

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          sterfry1988
                          last edited by

                          Here are screen shots of the different screens let me know if you need more info.

                          http://imgur.com/xSftVxH,PCIPb7i,es257OX,iaHuros,yDaam4d,JWfg73C#0

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            sterfry1988
                            last edited by

                            I am able to ping www.google.com from the WAN interface. I can not ping my LAN VIP (10.0.0.1) from the WAN interface, could this be a problem?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              sterfry1988
                              last edited by

                              I figured this out, apparently if you make a gateway from the interfaces tab it can gain priority and cause your routing to break? Probably user error on my end but once I removed the gateway I was able to route traffic again.

                              Thanks for your help.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post