• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Critique my design, please?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
19 Posts 12 Posters 2.5k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    cmb
    last edited by Jul 17, 2015, 6:26 AM

    @doktornotor:

    I would change the interface naming for LAN, someone might misunderstand that acronym :P

    @johnpoz:

    When I see POS I think Piece of Sh_T not Point of Sale ;)  So yeah I would change it ;)

    Good design advice.  :)

    I've worked on a couple customer systems before with similarly-named interfaces, POS_NET or something, and just think to myself "man no wonder, this network was doomed from the start with a name like that."

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • J Offline
      jsaad
      last edited by Jul 17, 2015, 5:01 PM

      I've changed it to POINT_OF_SALE.

      The camera system is a single windows computer (analog cameras) and there are only 2 other windows computers.

      This is an effort at PCI compliant solution that requires the point of sale equipment on the network to be isolated. obviously other measures need to be taken on the actual PCs and point of sale equipment.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        tim.mcmanus
        last edited by Jul 17, 2015, 10:12 PM

        I would have left it as POS, the rest of these nerds be damned!  I support POS installations, both kinds.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          jsaad
          last edited by Jul 31, 2015, 5:33 PM

          We've set this up.  Customer wants to print to a LAN printer on the POS_NETWORK from the STAFF_NETWORK.

          However If I open up firewall rules to allow for windows printing 137-139 and 445. won't that defeat the purpose of separate networks?  Won't it be wide open, then?

          Can the firewall rules allow specific ports to a specific IP address?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            phil.davis
            last edited by Jul 31, 2015, 5:40 PM

            Make sure the printer has a known static IP in LAN. Then add a firewall rule on POS to pass source POSnet destination Printer-IP ports 137-139,445
            It is easy if you make an alias "LANprinters" for the IP of the LAN printer - then you can add to that when another printer appears. And make a ports alias for the list of ports that need to be open to the printer.

            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              doktornotor Banned
              last edited by Jul 31, 2015, 5:43 PM

              137-139 and 445 is not for printing. It's for the crappy network browsing. Really cannot see how's this needed? Just point the damned printing to an FQDN or IP of the printer.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                MikeV7896
                last edited by Jul 31, 2015, 6:19 PM

                Printer ports would be 9100 TCP for HP JetDirect or 515 TCP for LPR/LPD. As mentioned, the other ports mentioned in this topic are for Windows networking (NetBIOS, SMB, etc.).

                The S in IOT stands for Security

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K Offline
                  kejianshi
                  last edited by Jul 31, 2015, 8:07 PM

                  Is your POS pfsense rig working ok?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J Offline
                    jsaad
                    last edited by Jul 31, 2015, 8:24 PM

                    ok, great advice. thanks! enjoy the weekend!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by Aug 1, 2015, 6:48 AM

                      We've set this up.  Customer wants to print to a LAN printer on the POS_NETWORK from the STAFF_NETWORK.

                      I would put the printer on the LAN network and make firewall rules so the POS stations could print to the printer on LAN instead of punching holes in the firewall in the other direction from LAN (unprotected) to POS (protected)..

                      My LAN rule would be:

                      reject any source any dest POS Net

                      I would also make the two networks more random and contained in one subnet, say (staying in 10/8 which is ill-advised to begin with):

                      10.67.234.0/24
                      10.67.235.0/24

                      Then the site can be referenced with a single /23.

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J Offline
                        jsaad
                        last edited by Aug 5, 2015, 1:52 PM

                        @kejianshi:

                        Is your POS pfsense rig working ok?

                        Runs good. Ordered another!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                          [[user:consent.lead]]
                          [[user:consent.not_received]]