Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    What would you choose between these 2 mini-itx fanless systems? (J1900 vs N3150)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    31 Posts 16 Posters 7.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      I am definitely biased but I wouldn't choose either one of those, for a number of reasons.  :-X

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bingo600B
        bingo600
        last edited by

        @jimp:

        I am definitely biased but I wouldn't choose either one of those, for a number of reasons.  :-X

        Care to elaborate a bit please ?

        I'm a pfsense newbie , just considering my first install
        https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=127036.0

        If i like it , i have been eyebaling the "black" one , as i only need VPN for "home" usage.

        /Bingo

        If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

        pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

        QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
        CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
        LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          messerchmidt
          last edited by

          would go n3150

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • bingo600B
            bingo600
            last edited by

            @messerchmidt:

            would go n3150

            Might do so too , but the "Box" shown has realtek IF's.
            Some users here says that they have problems with getting the 2'nd IF to forward packages.

            /Bingo

            If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

            pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

            QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
            CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
            LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              lansmurf
              last edited by

              Have you also taken a look at the Shuttle DS67U ? It is fanless, has got two Intel Nics, and a Celeron 3855U CPU which supports AES NI !    https://ark.intel.com/products/92211/Intel-Celeron-Processor-3855U-2M-Cache-1_60-GHz. This processor is according the benchmarks in the same leaque as the N3160.
              I am considering this one besides the Zotac CI325 but the CI325 has Realtek NICS  :( …

              pfSense 2.4.0 on Shuttle DS77U

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • I
                icest0rm
                last edited by

                @jimp:

                I am definitely biased but I wouldn't choose either one of those, for a number of reasons.  :-X

                thanks jimp, can you please detail the reasons so I can follow you? :)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • W
                  Waqar.UK
                  last edited by

                  @messerchmidt:

                  would go n3150

                  I am thinking of buying the n3150, but as someone pointed out, new Intel goldmont CPU's are coming out. Realtek has been proven to work with the current vesion of pfsense but what is the through put? Is it stable gigabit wan and lan?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    psensible
                    last edited by

                    Get the Quotom (disclaimer, I am using one happily).

                    AES-NI, according to anything I've managed to read on this forum, is an extremely dubious advantage for your typical smaller scale setup.

                    10W vs 6W is utterly trivial in terms of power savings.

                    Why buy yourself NIC compatibility problems with the N3150 option?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • W
                      Waqar.UK
                      last edited by

                      @psensible:

                      Get the Quotom (disclaimer, I am using one happily).

                      AES-NI, according to anything I've managed to read on this forum, is an extremely dubious advantage for your typical smaller scale setup.

                      10W vs 6W is utterly trivial in terms of power savings.

                      Why buy yourself NIC compatibility problems with the N3150 option?

                      Fair enough.

                      But: "AES-NI, according to anything I've managed to read on this forum, is an extremely dubious advantage for your typical smaller scale setup."

                      Can you point where please?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        VAMike
                        last edited by

                        @Waqar.UK:

                        But: "AES-NI, according to anything I've managed to read on this forum, is an extremely dubious advantage for your typical smaller scale setup."

                        If your bandwidth is low enough, anything modern can keep up using openvpn. AES-NI is only really a factor if you're doing higher speeds (but: those are becoming more common, which is why it's talked about so much here). If you have no chance to upgrade past a 50Mbps connection for the life of the hardware, it's a non-issue.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • I
                          icest0rm
                          last edited by

                          @lansmurf:

                          Have you also taken a look at the Shuttle DS67U ? It is fanless, has got two Intel Nics, and a Celeron 3855U CPU which supports AES NI !    https://ark.intel.com/products/92211/Intel-Celeron-Processor-3855U-2M-Cache-1_60-GHz. This processor is according the benchmarks in the same leaque as the N3160.
                          I am considering this one besides the Zotac CI325 but the CI325 has Realtek NICS  :( …

                          this does cost around 500 euros here :(

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • bingo600B
                            bingo600
                            last edited by

                            @icest0rm:

                            @lansmurf:

                            Have you also taken a look at the Shuttle DS67U ? It is fanless, has got two Intel Nics, and a Celeron 3855U CPU which supports AES NI !    https://ark.intel.com/products/92211/Intel-Celeron-Processor-3855U-2M-Cache-1_60-GHz. This processor is according the benchmarks in the same leaque as the N3160.
                            I am considering this one besides the Zotac CI325 but the CI325 has Realtek NICS  :( …

                            this does cost around 500 euros here :(

                            I see them on ebay for around 300$  (+ Ram & HDD)
                            http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-Shuttle-Ds67u-1-6Ghz-3855U-Bga1356-1-3L-Sized-Pc-Barebone-DS67U-/401281338907

                            http://www.ebay.com/itm/Shuttle-DS67U-1-6GHz-3855U-BGA1356-1-3L-sized-PC-Schwarz-PC-Workstation-B-HY614-/352003310020

                            Not often prices goes up (Recommended retail 226€) , maybe thats wo. VAT
                            http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews/Specific.aspx?ArticleId=48834

                            This one looks interesting too , dual intel NIC
                            But has fans) , and i suppose no CPU.

                            Shuttle XPC slim DQ170
                            http://www.shuttle.eu/products/slim/dq170/

                            /Bingo

                            If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                            pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                            QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                            CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                            LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              motific
                              last edited by

                              I have pretty much that exact N3150 box and it has been fine certainly since 2.3, no packet loss issues or other problems that I'm aware of (so far) - I'm currently on the 2.4 development builds.  I've given it a big list for pfBlockerNG to chew on and it's very happy.

                              Personally I wouldn't bother with the wifi in your firewall, give that work to a dedicated access point instead.

                              Intel NICs are the way to go though, irrespective of if the realteks are (or are not) any good they get a lot less driver support and are likely to be the first thing to cop the flak should a problem occur and they're not top of the pile should a fix need doing as the community mostly use Intel.  Certainly they add some extra overhead to the CPU where the Intels tend to have a lot more built-in capability.

                              I went with the N3150 box as I needed an HDMI display output but would have been better off with the J1900 and Intel box in the long run.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P
                                pfBasic Banned
                                last edited by

                                @VAMike:

                                @Waqar.UK:

                                But: "AES-NI, according to anything I've managed to read on this forum, is an extremely dubious advantage for your typical smaller scale setup."

                                If your bandwidth is low enough, anything modern can keep up using openvpn. AES-NI is only really a factor if you're doing higher speeds (but: those are becoming more common, which is why it's talked about so much here). If you have no chance to upgrade past a 50Mbps connection for the life of the hardware, it's a non-issue.

                                It could still be useful in low bandwidth applications if you are trying to do a lot with the box.
                                In an ideal scenario you would buy just enough machine to do what you need seamlessly, in which case AES-ni would still matter.

                                But in reality we just about all have hardware that dramatically outclasses our needs so yeah, then it doesn't matter.
                                Most of the modern low end hardware recommended for 50Mbps connections is really powerful relative to those needs, even the cheapest stuff.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P
                                  psensible
                                  last edited by

                                  @Waqar.UK:

                                  @psensible:

                                  Get the Quotom (disclaimer, I am using one happily).

                                  AES-NI, according to anything I've managed to read on this forum, is an extremely dubious advantage for your typical smaller scale setup.

                                  10W vs 6W is utterly trivial in terms of power savings.

                                  Why buy yourself NIC compatibility problems with the N3150 option?

                                  Fair enough.

                                  But: "AES-NI, according to anything I've managed to read on this forum, is an extremely dubious advantage for your typical smaller scale setup."

                                  Can you point where please?

                                  You'll have to do a forum search, or a google search using the "site:pfsense.org" option. There were a fair number of hits.  I looked at this mid last year then stopped worrying about it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W
                                    Waqar.UK
                                    last edited by

                                    Thanks.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • K
                                      kroem
                                      last edited by

                                      @chrcoluk:

                                      I own the N3150 unit which is very nice, however please read below.

                                      Others who own this unit reported only one of the 2 realtek NIC's working, I confirmed the same problem on my unit.  I have removed the wireless capability, so detached the aerials and removed the wireless card, replaced it with a dual port i350 intel NIC, and with the intel NIC's I added the unit is superb.

                                      Someone on kitz forum uses the other unit and he is very happy with it.

                                      The latter unit is better out of the box for sure, but the N3150 is perhaps better if you willing to add a intel addon card.

                                      Hey, that's pretty interesting, changing the NIC, is there some guide or recommendation how to? :)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ?
                                        Guest
                                        last edited by

                                        None of them I want to go with! I personally would bring in the game these two units here also well known working and 100%
                                        compatible with pfsense.

                                        till 500 MBit/s WAN
                                        APU2C4
                                        16/32/64 GB mSATA
                                        compex wle200nx or UBNT SR71-E

                                        over 500 MBit/s WAN
                                        Jetway NF9HG-2930
                                        8 GB RAM
                                        16/32/64 GB mSATA
                                        compex wle200nx or UBNT SR71-E

                                        For both or all units "nullmodem cable (console) and USB to Serial Adapter"
                                        Well know working without any hassle and problems.

                                        Not the newest products but reliable and stable running.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P
                                          Pepelamour
                                          last edited by

                                          Hi everyone! I'm currently looking for APU2C4 System Board and I have some questions related Varia Store I found few posts ago.

                                          • I found 4 boxes in different colour (grey, blue, red and black) with different Prices  but without any technical differences. Is there any technical differences between them I did not see?

                                          • All these boxes come with 4 GB DDR3-1333 DRAM embedded in the system board or must I add the 4GB DDR3 memory in the Shopping Cart ?

                                          • The box comes with MSATA 16GB memory. Could I think all components needed to boot Pfsense firewall software are embedded in the box or some other component is needed to start the system?

                                          • And the last and more important question: This is for a very small office, just 4 PC connected to internet DSL of 20MB as much. And the only requirement important is to be able to configure a VPN client to site ( remote access vpn) to connect a laptop from home to a little NAS in this office. I supose this APU2C4 is enough for this kind of needs. Could someone confirm me this last point please?

                                          Thanks so much for your answers.
                                          regards,
                                          Laurent

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.