Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    I can ping PFSense but PFSense can't ping back

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    42 Posts 7 Posters 12.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • -
      -striker- 0 @Konstanti
      last edited by

      @konstanti

      1. I would prefer not to change my link speed. It is currently running at 1000. If I switch it down to 10 or 100, I would be limiting my access to my internet as my internet connection is currently rated for 300. Additionally, this was working previously under the current link state, so I would be surprised if this would resolve anything. What is your rationale for checking this?

      2. Tried a different cable, no change in results.

      3. Tried connecting a device directly to pfsense. No change in results.

      4. Subnet Mask is set to 255.255.255.0 in DHCP and aligns with the client.

      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • -
        -striker- 0 @chpalmer
        last edited by

        @chpalmer I thought it could be client side firewall too. I normally leave those disabled on my internal LAN as they just cause unnecessary trouble. I have confirmed and they are still off.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DerelictD
          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
          last edited by

          Then you'll have to packet capture to see the pings going out and nothing coming back, look at the MAC addresses, etc.

          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            Konstanti @-striker- 0
            last edited by Konstanti

            @striker-0
            Reducing the connection speed is just a test
            I am very confused by the line in ping test
            255.255.255.0 > 10.0.100.51: ICMP echo request, id 16367, seq 0, length 64
            ( I don't know what's the subnet mask )

            Should be so

            length 98: 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.230: ICMP echo request, id 30542, seq 0, length 64
            length 98: 192.168.1.230 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo reply, id 30542, seq 0, length 64
            length 98: 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.230: ICMP echo request, id 30542, seq 1, length 64
            length 98: 192.168.1.230 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo reply, id 30542, seq 1, length 64

            Can you put the packet capture file here ?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • -
              -striker- 0 @Derelict
              last edited by

              @derelict I have confirmed the firewall is off. This issue occurs across all devices on my network, the only constant is pfsense. Additionally, within my network other devices can ping each other and I can connect to the port I am trying to forward. Something is going on with pfsense or the hardware it resides on.

              K DerelictD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                Konstanti @-striker- 0
                last edited by

                @striker-0
                And another question - how much do you have active NORDVPN tunnels ?
                if you turn them off, will anything change ?

                - 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  @striker-0 said in I can ping PFSense but PFSense can't ping back:

                  255.255.255.0 > 10.0.100.51:

                  That is NOT right it sould be pinging from pfsense IP on that 10.0.100 network..

                  re0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
                  	options=82098<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE>
                  	capabilities=18399b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE,NETMAP>
                  	ether 00:11:09:d7:2b:fa
                  	hwaddr 00:11:09:d7:2b:fa
                  	inet6 fe80::211:9ff:fed7:2bfa%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
                  	inet 10.0.100.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.100.255
                  	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                  	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex,master>)
                  	status: active
                  

                  That is the IP it should be pinging from 10.0.100.1

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate @-striker- 0
                    last edited by

                    @striker-0 Post a packet capture taken on each interface of pings that work and pings that fail.

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    - 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • -
                      -striker- 0 @Konstanti
                      last edited by

                      @konstanti at the moment, my NORDVPN tunnel is down. I see no difference in activity when the tunnel is up or down.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        Konstanti @johnpoz
                        last edited by Konstanti

                        @johnpoz
                        All this is very strange, because of the webgui
                        pfsense is also forming a command
                        / sbin/ping -S 10.0.100.1 -c 3 10.0.100.51 (as seen in the picture)
                        and tcpdump shows another

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • -
                          -striker- 0 @Derelict
                          last edited by

                          @derelict Here is a packet capture from pfsense where I tried to ping 10.0.100.51 on the LAN interface and it failed.

                          12:47:22.869939 00:11:09:d7:2b:fa > 00:22:15:9f:4b:51, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 98: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 14477, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
                          255.255.255.0 > 10.0.100.51: ICMP echo request, id 49230, seq 0, length 64
                          12:47:23.875326 00:11:09:d7:2b:fa > 00:22:15:9f:4b:51, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 98: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 41292, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
                          255.255.255.0 > 10.0.100.51: ICMP echo request, id 49230, seq 1, length 64
                          12:47:24.877890 00:11:09:d7:2b:fa > 00:22:15:9f:4b:51, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 98: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 38991, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
                          255.255.255.0 > 10.0.100.51: ICMP echo request, id 49230, seq 2, length 64

                          pfsense packet capture doesn't seem to capture any packets when I ping from my workstation to the server even with the use of promiscuous mode. Any suggestions on a tool to capture the information you are looking for?

                          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            Konstanti @-striker- 0
                            last edited by Konstanti

                            @striker-0
                            0_1548615129595_f1b4a77b-657e-4585-ae4a-450e95d008d0-image.png

                            Need a file that you download after clicking " Download capture"

                            - 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • -
                              -striker- 0 @Konstanti
                              last edited by

                              @konstanti capture download attached. Forums wouldn't accept a .cap file, so I zipped it.

                              0_1548615280401_packetcapture(1).zip

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DerelictD
                                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                last edited by

                                Great. What are we looking at?

                                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                K - 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  its pinging from 255.255.255.0 - so no that is never going to work.

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • K
                                    Konstanti @Derelict
                                    last edited by

                                    @derelict
                                    0_1548615516334_63c7b4a4-fc6d-4d81-a71a-7fe12ddeb6db-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DerelictD
                                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                      last edited by

                                      It looks like you have what should be a netmask somewhere that should be an address. As was said earlier, this makes no sense:

                                      Source: 255.255.255.0

                                      What interface is that capture taken on?

                                      The only thing that could do that that I can think of is Outbound NAT on that interface being completely misconfigured. Outbound NAT would also only affect traffic in that direction.

                                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                      - 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • -
                                        -striker- 0 @Derelict
                                        last edited by

                                        @derelict That is a packet capture taken while performing a ping command from the LAN interface to 10.0.100.51.

                                        The packet capture was capturing ICMP IPV4 traffic activity from the LAN interface with the promiscuous setting enabled and set to capture full detail.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • -
                                          -striker- 0 @Derelict
                                          last edited by

                                          @derelict I do not have any outbound NAT configured against my LAN interface, only WAN.

                                          0_1548615917208_Outbound NAT.JPG

                                          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DerelictD
                                            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                            last edited by

                                            Well you have something configured completely wrong.

                                            Navigate here: https://your_firewall_ip/status.php

                                            Download the resulting status_output.tgz file

                                            Upload it to the nextcloud link I sent to you in chat.

                                            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                            - 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.