• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

DNS resolves but there is a delay in ping response

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
8 Posts 2 Posters 862 Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P
    pacmac
    last edited by Jan 30, 2020, 12:54 AM

    Hello,

    I have a ESXi machine. I have pfSense in an VM, Debian with PiHole in another VM connected to the pfSense LAN interface.

    if I do a ping www.google.com, it resolves instantly, but there is a delay to the first ping response.
    if I do a ping from pfSense, it resolves and start receiving responses instantly.

    pfSense is using that Debian/PiHole VM for DNS requests.

    any idea?

    BR.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • P
      pacmac
      last edited by Jan 30, 2020, 2:31 AM

      I have a big delay also accessing to outlook.office.com

      While looking to the browser logs I see that there are a lot of net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET 200 errors.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by johnpoz Jan 30, 2020, 2:57 AM Jan 30, 2020, 2:54 AM

        And why would you think pfsense has anything to do with that? Are you running proxy on pfsense?

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        P 1 Reply Last reply Jan 30, 2020, 2:55 AM Reply Quote 0
        • P
          pacmac @johnpoz
          last edited by Jan 30, 2020, 2:55 AM

          Because when I back to my router as gateway, then connection is perfect.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by Jan 30, 2020, 2:58 AM

            Are you running proxy on pfsense?

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            P 1 Reply Last reply Jan 30, 2020, 3:04 AM Reply Quote 0
            • P
              pacmac @johnpoz
              last edited by pacmac Jan 30, 2020, 3:06 AM Jan 30, 2020, 3:04 AM

              @johnpoz no.

              I have created (on ESXi):

              • one vswitch for WAN
                pfsense address 192.168.0.2
                gateway address 192.168.0.1 (my livebox)
              • one vswitch for LAN
                pfsense as gateway on 10.0.0.1
                pihole on 10.0.0.3

              I have a desktop on the livebox subnet: 192.168.0.0/24 with this configuration
              IP address 192.168.0.103
              Gateway 192.168.0.2 (pfSense)
              DNS 8.8.8.8

              and I still have the same problem, delays between name resolution and response on pings and big delay on most web accesses.

              let me know if you want screenshots from anything.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by Jan 30, 2020, 3:08 AM

                None of that has anything to do with what I asked.. Are you running proxy on pfsense?

                Resolving and RTT of pings have zero to do with each other.

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                P 1 Reply Last reply Jan 30, 2020, 3:09 AM Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  pacmac @johnpoz
                  last edited by Jan 30, 2020, 3:09 AM

                  @johnpoz

                  I answered 'no' to that on my previous comment in the first line.

                  I don't have too much idea about networking, sorry. I am just giving you as much information as I can.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  6 out of 8
                  • First post
                    6/8
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                    This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                    consent.not_received