• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Same gateway for two WAN interfaces (same isp) problem in pfsense 2.0

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
10 Posts 6 Posters 9.3k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K
    kevindd992002
    last edited by Aug 29, 2011, 4:54 PM

    Is this already solved in 2.0? Or will there still be a conflict?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • N
      Nachtfalke
      last edited by Aug 29, 2011, 5:47 PM

      I think you will use LoadBalancing/Failover:
      Not it is not solved. The actual workaround is to double NAT one gateway so that there are different gateways.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kevindd992002
        last edited by Aug 30, 2011, 1:45 AM

        Yeah, and double-NATting means you need another router for one of the modems before going into pfsense, right?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          Metu69salemi
          last edited by Aug 30, 2011, 4:23 AM

          or just use modem in routing mode instead of bridging

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kevindd992002
            last edited by Aug 30, 2011, 8:30 AM

            Is there a way to do that for the Motorola SB5101 cable modem? I think there's none?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              singerie
              last edited by Aug 31, 2011, 5:02 PM

              @kevindd992002:

              Is there a way to do that for the Motorola SB5101 cable modem? I think there's none?

              i don't think so.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                claes_hellgren
                last edited by Aug 31, 2011, 10:45 PM Aug 31, 2011, 10:33 PM

                Will it be fixed in the final release of pfSense 2.0?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  Metu69salemi
                  last edited by Sep 1, 2011, 3:51 AM

                  Don't going to think so. If I remember it right it depends more likely to source os than pfsense itself.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    cmb
                    last edited by Sep 1, 2011, 6:59 AM

                    @Metu69salemi:

                    If I remember it right it depends more likely to source os than pfsense itself.

                    this. No plans to add this support at this time (though our plans are entirely dependent on what people are willing to pay for, so they can change at any time). Definitely won't be in 2.0, that's coming out next week.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      Metu69salemi
                      last edited by Sep 1, 2011, 7:01 AM

                      @cmb:

                      Definitely won't be in 2.0, that's coming out next week.

                      Greatly OT, but still. Really good news to hear

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      1 out of 10
                      • First post
                        1/10
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                        consent.not_received