• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Ia64 support

Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
4
6
2.2k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F
    frontsidebus
    last edited by Nov 16, 2011, 2:43 PM

    hi guys, pfsense have a ia64 (itanium2) compatibility?

    regards

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • D
      dotdash
      last edited by Nov 16, 2011, 3:58 PM

      No.
      It would be possible, as FreeBSD supports the architecture, but the team is already busy with the i386/amd64 builds. I don't see it happening.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F
        frontsidebus
        last edited by Nov 16, 2011, 4:03 PM

        damm  :-\ thanks for info.

        regards

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jasonlitka
          last edited by Nov 17, 2011, 6:09 PM

          Why exactly would you want to do this?  Itanium boxes are expensive, slow and power hungry.

          I can break anything.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F
            frontsidebus
            last edited by Nov 17, 2011, 7:51 PM

            I have a lot of itanium 2 16gb scsi 10k servers.
            Retired a bull novascale and i hope reuse them.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by Nov 21, 2011, 6:59 PM

              It's not a Tier 1 architecture in FreeBSD these days anyhow… From /usr/src/UPDATING

              NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 8.x IS SLOW ON IA64 OR SUN4V:
                      For ia64 the INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT kernel options
                      were left in the GENERIC kernel because the kernel does not
                      work properly without them.  For sun4v all of the normal kernel
                      debugging tools present in HEAD were left in place because
                      sun4v support still needs work to become production ready.
              
              

              So even if you could get them to work, they would be even slower than usual.

              See also: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/archs.html

              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              6 out of 6
              • First post
                6/6
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.