Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    L
    @KOM said in Squid: "Undefined symbol "_ZTVNSt3__117bad_function_callE" after upgrade to 2.8: I'm also not comfortable with the 'move lib somewhere else' fix as I don't know what side-effects it may have and I don't know how a future upgrade will handle it. I have two pfSense with longer upgrade history running, came across the same problem when upgrading to 2.8 and my thoughts were exactly the same. But then I was diving deeper and... The upgraded one, after the upgrade: # ls -l /usr/lib/libc++* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9415736 May 22 03:19 /usr/lib/libc++.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48 May 22 03:19 /usr/lib/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 819952 Jan 31 2022 /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 952 May 22 03:19 /usr/lib/libc++experimental.a The one still on 2.7.2 / FreeBSD 14: # ls -l /usr/lib/libc++* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8603484 Dec 6 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48 Dec 6 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 819952 Jan 31 2022 /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 87114 Dec 6 2023 /usr/lib/libc++experimental.a And last, but not least a stock FreeBSD 14.0 REL-p4: # ls -l /usr/lib/libc++* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8579844 Nov 10 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48 Nov 10 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 86778 Nov 10 2023 /usr/lib/libc++experimental.a As i see it, this libc++.so.1 as of 2022 must have been left back by an earlier update. Especially when looking at such a commonly used lib, I would speculate that the rm command used to remove it during this earlier update was using it itself and thus, was unable to remove it. Knowing this, I followed the recommendation to just remove it (or move it away to /root), rebooted and everything works fine. There is no need to un/reinstall squid. Just move away /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 and reboot. When updating from 2.7.2 or another FreeBSD 14 based release, it may also be an option to do this before starting the update to keep the downtime as short as possible. And, coming back to the concern quoted initially: I beleive that it is very unlikely that anybody will miss this old lib. Maybe somebody who upgraded an instance with less upgrade history can have a look in his /usr/lib and confirm that there is no libc++.so.1 at all.
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    M
    Hi, I had a problem with my home network today, so I checked pfsense and discovered that suricata had blocked the wan ip. After some tests and triggering some suricata alerts, the wan ip was blocked. I restarted pfsense and ran some more tests, but the problem no longer occurred. I then checked the wan interface settings and indeed the ip list does not include the wan ip, both now that it's working and before, when it was blocked. I'm using pfsense 2.8.0 and suricata 7.0.8_2. I use PPPoE to access the Internet.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @Leon-Straathof Data retention settings are handled inside of ntopng. Documentation here. Pay attention to the RRD note. Also, if you've turned on some of the slice and dice time series information (is off by default), I'd suggest turning them back off. These balloon the storage requirements and are of little actual use.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    T
    Ran into this issue today as well running on 25.07.1 with pfblockerNG-devel 3.2.7. Followed the steps outlined in this thread to edit the pfblockerng.sh file, then deleted/force reloaded all the lists, and all was well again. Thank you everyone in this thread for your your help and great instructions.
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    496 Topics
    3k Posts
    R
    @provels said in updating to acme 1.0 breaks system beyond repair: need to restore from backup: This same mess happened to me, even w/o Acme, going from 25.07 to *.1. Blew, reinstalled w/ Crowdsec, blew again, reinstalled, clipped all the Crowdsec info from config.xml, restored config, back to normal. Crowdsec is a great concept, but I think I'm out. I never had this issue with Crowdec before the ACME update, even with updating from 2.7 to 2.8 there was no issues. In fact after restoring from a backup after the ACME update, Crowdsec reinstalled just fine, and this was before the recent release a couple days ago that contained a fix.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    606 Posts
    M
    @yobyot I've SSHed into pfsense and for the sake of testing I've simply run the command: tailscale up --auth-key=tskey-client-kQ_THE_REST_IS_A_SECRET\?preauthorized=true\&ephemeral=false --accept-dns=false --accept-routes --advertise-exit-node --advertise-routes=X.X.X.X/24 --advertise-tags=tag:pfsense Note the preauthorized=true and ephemeral=false I gave this key all permissions (temporarly as I just wanted to verify it's working) of course I had to register the tag used also in the ACL tags pane: https://login.tailscale.com/admin/acls/visual/tags so far so good
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    697 Topics
    4k Posts
    H
    I figured out the issue. I missed adding the 3rd locations Lan to the static routing. Now all is working perfect.
  • MOVED: Snort master Suppress List

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • PfBlockerNGSuppress: Added host Alias List but not allowing through

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    BBcan177B
    When you enable "Suppression" in the General tab, the "+" icon should appear in the Alerts Tab beside the Blocked IP address. Maybe you can use the "Adv Inbound Settings" for those Open Ports : https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=86212.msg524957#msg524957 For the Whitelist, be careful with Permit Inbound or Permit Both… You only want to use those if you set the specific ports and destination Lan IP addresses that is allowed to enter from the WAN. Otherwise you are allowing those IPs to bypass any other Firewall rules in the WAN Firewall tab. Rules are processed top to bottom...
  • Using two OpenVPN tunnels with Quagga, but IP connections are iterrupted

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    644 Views
    T
    Hey, based on this article https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Asymmetric_Routing_and_Firewall_Rules I added a corresponding floating firewall rule for both OpenVPN interfaces. Works like a charme!!! No TCP connection interuption anymore! I love pfsense :-)
  • Apcupsd SMTP Builtin multiple email

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    774 Views
    D
    I think not. This smtp built-in is very simple. Maybe send the alert to a redirect account ? Regards.
  • MOVED: HAPROXY config Help !

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    639 Views
    No one has replied
  • New PFSense user needs PFBlockerNG advice

    37
    0 Votes
    37 Posts
    7k Views
    ?
    @bmeeks: Same thought processes apply for any list.  Do you want to selectively allow some packets based on their source IP, and let the default block handle everything else; or do you want to have an "allow from any source IP" on the WAN rule and let the firewall check each packet IP against a bunch of IPs on a bunch of lists to see if it should in reality block the traffic. I, and some others on here, recommend the former approach.  Use smaller "allow" lists in conjunction with the default block. However, I'm not trying to change your mind.  You seem to have formed an opinion for how you want to do it, so do it that way and don't fret over it. Bill No, I'm using the package as recommended in the documentation and common sites that offer instructions. I asked, in the initial post, for comments from people who knew what I did and covered the same territory. The info on the lists was vague. The country blocking is really in your face in the package and appears to be recommended. Thus my questions for actual package users, as opposed to people who have opinions but no direct experience. Thanks, though, for the alias info, I intend to study it closely.
  • How often are official packages upgraded?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    @PiBa: It seems to me it depends a lot on how active a package is maintained That's the bulk of the answer there. Also depends on what necessitated the update in the package itself. Updates for security reasons get updated packages quickly. Outside of that, "it depends", primarily on who's the maintainer. Sometimes a package being outdated means it's abandoned, but in other cases like haproxy as PiBa mentioned, it's more a factor of "it ain't broke, don't fix it."
  • Upgrade NTOP package to NTOPNG

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    7k Views
    jimpJ
    ntopng 2.0 has not made it into the FreeBSD ports tree yet. That has to happen before any progress can be made on bringing it into pfSense.
  • Package OpenOSPFd not found

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    685 Views
    jimpJ
    OpenOSPFd has been gone for a while. It was very broken, rarely worked properly, and hadn't been maintained in years. If you need OSPF, use quagga.
  • Does such a package exist?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    774 Views
    G
    I think i have that but would need more of a content oriented slant with websites highlighted. I've seen this available (not on pfsense) but don't know where/what package.
  • PFBlockerNg Questions

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    D
    Thank you again, I was attempting it but got confused with all the settings.  I shall go and read, many thanks again….
  • PfBlockerNG blocking ports not listed in Alias port list

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    Thanks for the sharing of wisdom!! NOPE!!  Still any…  I'll change that ASAP Thanks!! Dino
  • PfBlockerNG Alias types (Deny, Permit, Match, and Native)

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    8k Views
    F
    Thanks, tcp/udp here!
  • MOVED: Dansguardian suddenly borked

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    511 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: Squid and http/1.1 and 417 errors - FIX

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    455 Views
    No one has replied
  • Rm -r SARG

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    768 Views
    R
    Would be really grateful for a reply on this one as I can't get Sarg back to normal now and don't want to have to reinstall everything thanks
  • Squid & vSphere Web Client

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    846 Views
    No one has replied
  • Arpwatch does not start on 2.2.2\. x64

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    729 Views
    Z
    Since this doesn't seem to be a priority, shouldn't it be removed from the package list for 2.2?
  • PostFix Not Receiving Mail?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    737 Views
    M
    For anyone curious. I found out my issue. It works on 2.1.5 and older, but not 2.2.2. What a shame :( Here is the link for anybody new like myself that wants to follow: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=40622.msg526566#msg526566
  • MOVED: Ipguard No funciona

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    432 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.