Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    L
    @KOM said in Squid: "Undefined symbol "_ZTVNSt3__117bad_function_callE" after upgrade to 2.8: I'm also not comfortable with the 'move lib somewhere else' fix as I don't know what side-effects it may have and I don't know how a future upgrade will handle it. I have two pfSense with longer upgrade history running, came across the same problem when upgrading to 2.8 and my thoughts were exactly the same. But then I was diving deeper and... The upgraded one, after the upgrade: # ls -l /usr/lib/libc++* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9415736 May 22 03:19 /usr/lib/libc++.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48 May 22 03:19 /usr/lib/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 819952 Jan 31 2022 /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 952 May 22 03:19 /usr/lib/libc++experimental.a The one still on 2.7.2 / FreeBSD 14: # ls -l /usr/lib/libc++* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8603484 Dec 6 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48 Dec 6 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 819952 Jan 31 2022 /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 87114 Dec 6 2023 /usr/lib/libc++experimental.a And last, but not least a stock FreeBSD 14.0 REL-p4: # ls -l /usr/lib/libc++* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8579844 Nov 10 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 48 Nov 10 2023 /usr/lib/libc++.so -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 86778 Nov 10 2023 /usr/lib/libc++experimental.a As i see it, this libc++.so.1 as of 2022 must have been left back by an earlier update. Especially when looking at such a commonly used lib, I would speculate that the rm command used to remove it during this earlier update was using it itself and thus, was unable to remove it. Knowing this, I followed the recommendation to just remove it (or move it away to /root), rebooted and everything works fine. There is no need to un/reinstall squid. Just move away /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 and reboot. When updating from 2.7.2 or another FreeBSD 14 based release, it may also be an option to do this before starting the update to keep the downtime as short as possible. And, coming back to the concern quoted initially: I beleive that it is very unlikely that anybody will miss this old lib. Maybe somebody who upgraded an instance with less upgrade history can have a look in his /usr/lib and confirm that there is no libc++.so.1 at all.
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    M
    Hi, I had a problem with my home network today, so I checked pfsense and discovered that suricata had blocked the wan ip. After some tests and triggering some suricata alerts, the wan ip was blocked. I restarted pfsense and ran some more tests, but the problem no longer occurred. I then checked the wan interface settings and indeed the ip list does not include the wan ip, both now that it's working and before, when it was blocked. I'm using pfsense 2.8.0 and suricata 7.0.8_2. I use PPPoE to access the Internet.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @Leon-Straathof Data retention settings are handled inside of ntopng. Documentation here. Pay attention to the RRD note. Also, if you've turned on some of the slice and dice time series information (is off by default), I'd suggest turning them back off. These balloon the storage requirements and are of little actual use.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    T
    Ran into this issue today as well running on 25.07.1 with pfblockerNG-devel 3.2.7. Followed the steps outlined in this thread to edit the pfblockerng.sh file, then deleted/force reloaded all the lists, and all was well again. Thank you everyone in this thread for your your help and great instructions.
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    496 Topics
    3k Posts
    R
    @provels said in updating to acme 1.0 breaks system beyond repair: need to restore from backup: This same mess happened to me, even w/o Acme, going from 25.07 to *.1. Blew, reinstalled w/ Crowdsec, blew again, reinstalled, clipped all the Crowdsec info from config.xml, restored config, back to normal. Crowdsec is a great concept, but I think I'm out. I never had this issue with Crowdec before the ACME update, even with updating from 2.7 to 2.8 there was no issues. In fact after restoring from a backup after the ACME update, Crowdsec reinstalled just fine, and this was before the recent release a couple days ago that contained a fix.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    606 Posts
    M
    @yobyot I've SSHed into pfsense and for the sake of testing I've simply run the command: tailscale up --auth-key=tskey-client-kQ_THE_REST_IS_A_SECRET\?preauthorized=true\&ephemeral=false --accept-dns=false --accept-routes --advertise-exit-node --advertise-routes=X.X.X.X/24 --advertise-tags=tag:pfsense Note the preauthorized=true and ephemeral=false I gave this key all permissions (temporarly as I just wanted to verify it's working) of course I had to register the tag used also in the ACL tags pane: https://login.tailscale.com/admin/acls/visual/tags so far so good
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    697 Topics
    4k Posts
    H
    I figured out the issue. I missed adding the 3rd locations Lan to the static routing. Now all is working perfect.
  • MOVED: Squid3 Antivirus on 2.2 release

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    505 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: SNORT Exiting on sig 11

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    437 Views
    No one has replied
  • Issues with Installing/reinstalling packages in Service Watchdog

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    684 Views
    No one has replied
  • PFblockerNG 2.2.3 "pf Errors found."

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    Sigh. Why do you block the entire world? Whitelist what you want instead. There's already default deny rule on WAN blocking everyhing unless you allow it. Limit what you allow to a whitelist alias instead, if you have any wildcard permit rules on WAN. If not, then Deny Inbound is completely useless overhead. Regarding outbound, the above ruleset makes Internet just about unusable.
  • Postfix forwarder + mailscanner NOT blocking attachments but want it to!

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    P
    Nobody knows I bet - if possible, maybe put PFSense on a VM and try it out.  I revisited the forum tonight because of some 2.2.3 issues.  I'm almost changing my philosophy when it comes to complicated PFSense installs that if it's working DON'T UPGRADE!
  • Freeradius2 and wifi controller

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    Not sure what to change,  just to recap 66.234.240.134 is my WAN address 66.234.240.132 is my controller 192.168.1.1 is my LAN gateway that I dont want to involve in this setup at all and it shows up as my address during the radtest I belive my setup should be client "klucz" {   ipaddr = 66.234.240.132   proto = udp   secret = klucz   require_message_authenticator = no   max_connections = 16   shortname = klucz   nastype = other   ### login = !root ###   ### password = someadminpass ### } Currently I listen on * ports 1812 and 1813 There is a rule on my WAN interface IPv4 TCP/UDP 66.234.240.132 * WAN address 1812 (RADIUS) * none   radius I have one user for test that works How can I get rid of that wrong NAS IP playing with the NAT?
  • MOVED: unable to uninstall squidguard

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    456 Views
    No one has replied
  • Stunnel not start

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    9k Views
    E
    I'm on the x64 platform but what fixed this for me was updating stunnel with the pkg command: pkg install stunnel after this, all fixed up!
  • SOLVED: SARG: "View Report" shows no report

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: SquidGuard ext url * redirect not working

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • PFsense 2.2.3 Bandwidthd Package not starting

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: Squid not logging

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    548 Views
    No one has replied
  • Zabbix Proxy IPMI monitoring

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    L
    @doktornotor: Move your monitoring efforts somewhere else. Even after recompiling, you won't be able to install this without maintaining your own packages repository. Oh, well. Maybe better ask the devs in feature request thread. Anyway, thanks for answer
  • MOVED: Squid-2.7.9_3-amd64 package installation aborted

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    438 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: Squidguard doesnt block websites lol

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    487 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: Suricata/Snort Kills Data Streaming

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    569 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: Snort stops by itself

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    417 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: SSL Proxy with category based filtering

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    470 Views
    No one has replied
  • Mailreport - broken images in email

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    luckman212L
    Didn't want to start a new thread (sorry) I found a bug in mailreport 2.3 related to editing items in the "Report Commands" section and have fixed it with a patch. I created pull request #891 here's a direct link to the commit be8c333 Hope this is the proper way to do things as I am new to it. update: good news, my patch was accepted & merged, v2.3.1 is already available in package mgr.  cheers guys  :D
  • MOVED: Streaming media sites are blocked

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    520 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.