• IPSEC DNS Traffic issue

    26
    0 Votes
    26 Posts
    2k Views
    DerelictD

    Great Apply IP addresses and networks to all of that and show your configuration. Need to see all of the interfaces, all of the interface rules including IPsec tabs, all of the IPsec configuration, etc. Then explain exactly what is NOT working in a manner such that there is no guessing involved.

  • No Site To Site L2TP on PfSense ?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    358 Views
    awebsterA

    @denis31, I wouldn't expect many people on this forum to know what / how the Motorola RFS L2TPv3 link works, however, as luck would have it, I do.
    I'm assuming you have another RFS at the other end of the L2TPv3 link.
    I've never tried do to what you are looking to do with pfSense, I'd have to spin up a lab to have a crack at it.
    Ultimately, I'd suggest you have a rethink on how you can replace the L2TPv3 link with an IPSEC link. You can configure the RFS to run an IPSEC tunnel to pfSense, its not as simple to configure as L2TPv3 by any stretch, but it works.
    If you are using the L2TPv3 to do stuff like adopting remote APs, you will ultimately have to migrate your environment from Bridged tunnelling to Local egress.

  • Reach mobile client from LAN via IPsec tunnel

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    1k Views
    L

    Some more debugging on the fw:

    ping 192.168.2.145
    Generates ICMP echo request packages on the gw interface (sk0/sk2), no ICMP echo reply is received (obviously).
    Result: ping command gets no answer.

    ping -S 192.168.1.10 192.168.2.145
    Generates ICMP echo request packages on the ipsec interface (enc0) and the clients answers back with ICMP echo reply packages.
    Result: ping command is ok.

    route add 192.168.2.144/28 192.168.1.10
    ping 192.168.2.145
    Generates ICMP echo request packages on the ipsec interface (enc0) and the clients answers back with ICMP echo reply packages.
    Result: ping command is ok.

    BUT:
    Even with the above route, i can ping the client only from the fw itself, but not from the network. I`ve also tried playing with NAT rules to force the fw source address, but no lock so far.

    Any further idea to solve the problem?

  • IPSEC Service not starting after initial install

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    ugh I'm not smart ☺

  • Traffic from Firewall trough IPSEC Tunnel fails

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    404 Views
    B

    Also, you might be better off using VTI.

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Ip Sec

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    567 Views
    NogBadTheBadN

    Not sure what you mean.

    You may be better posting here:-

    https://forum.netgate.com/category/67/pfsense-international-support

  • Remote VPN Ipsec Tunnel not reachable from mobile clients

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    469 Views
    K

    @trasher-mx
    Then you need to show / check the phase 2 settings on both sides of the tunnel
    and show/check the rules on the openvpn interface
    Or using tcpdump to find the place where the packets are blocked

  • IPsec Phase 2 entry for access to WAN interface?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    435 Views
    viktor_gV

    @marama So, you can try to use Policy NAT with some pseudo net which translates to 192.168.0.0/24 of WAN (10.0.0.0/24 in example):
    Port Forward with source field:
    Screenshot from 2019-09-02 12-04-07.png

    or 1:1 NAT with destination field

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    210 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    326 Views
    mooncaptainM

    AWS config problem - I reinsntalled pfsense on AWS carefully following instructions and resolved most of the issues. Still had to tweak the elastic IP assignment to get the LAN assignment to be available in pfsense. The instructions seem to indicate that the elastic ip should be assigned to an interface in AWS but when I changed it to be assigned to the pfsense instance then the ip showed up as a network interface in pFsense.

  • IPSEC with outbound NAT + 1:1 NAT

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    343 Views
    T

    Few complements (i haven't have solved the issue)
    I see the following states

    vtnet4 icmp 10.45.226.1:15026 (172.20.74.31:47548) -> 10.45.226.3:15026 0:0
    enc0 icmp 10.45.226.3:47548 (10.100.45.2:47548) <- 172.20.74.31:47548 0:0

    where enc0 is ipsec i assume
    and vtnet4 is the LAN interface.

    This issue is driving me mad, i can provide schemes, and answer to anyone willing to help.

  • IPsec Stop working after few commands

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    572 Views
    jimpJ

    Either the states are being removed or you have some asymmetric routing happening that is cutting off the connection after the half-open state times out.

  • multiple connection l2TP behind a NAT

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    181 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPsec Site-to-Site with NAT

    28
    0 Votes
    28 Posts
    3k Views
    J

    Well, doesn't matter now, I got it properly working using OpenVPN, took all of an hour including coffee time, vs IPsec which has been weeks in the making. Thank you for steering me into the light @Derelict

  • IPSec tunnels going down sometimes when phase 2 renegotiation happens.

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    381 Views
    stephenw10S

    Well you should have everything at p3 anyway. I'm not aware of any particular issue between p2 and p3 though.

    Do you have any logs showing the negotiation failure from either end?

    Steve

  • ipsec mobile with 2f Google Authenticator

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    200 Views
    jimpJ

    You might get that to work with an IKEv1 Xauth style setup. It definitely will not work with IKEv2 EAP, though because EAP won't work with PAP.

  • IPsec advanced settings MSS clamping vs IPsec interface MSS clamping

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    G

    @Konstanti
    Thank you!
    That clears it up!

    I will be using the settings on the IPsec interface tab.

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    292 Views
    No one has replied
  • VPN IPsec tunnel keeps disconnecting

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    251 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.