• Windows 11 IPSec ESP no acceptable proposal found

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    keyserK

    @lifeboy When editing the Phase one and Phase 2 settings, only one encryption settings is enabled in both:
    AES256 and using SHA256 with DH14:

    72a1546e-02d3-4f89-bebe-3fc688c05aec-image.png

    937960d9-5daa-465f-a6f4-630ecdc079ac-image.png

  • all VPN IPSEC connections are down suddenly

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    336 Views
    P

    @viragomann

    Hello @viragomann

    Please see details logs on attachment filelog-ipsec-details-pfsense.txt

    Thank you for your help

    Regards

  • Phase 2 drops

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    146 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    209 Views
    J

    turns out, it was me. i mistakenly upgraded the secondary node to 2.7.2, but forgot to upgrade the primary node and it was still 2.7.0. HAsync was not working due to this error, so this was not a pfsense problem, it was a me problem :)

  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    496 Views
    L

    @michmoor i've founf the problem. When my p1 have multiple p2. It always getting disconnected. I dont know why its happening on latest pfsense version.

  • IPSec behind NAT

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    927 Views
    X

    @viragomann Before routing the traffic of Server, I would like PFSense01 and PFSense02 to ping on the VTI interfaces, because from the screenshot that I showed before on PFSense01 there are 0 outbound packets, and I don't now why

  • IPSec widget: misleading status, maybe

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    156 Views
    No one has replied
  • Issues: PFSense VTI X SonicWall

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    129 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    262 Views
    T

    Forgot to mention Site A uses Cox Cable and Site B uses Comcast.

  • Editing ipsec.conf

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    127 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPSec Hub and Spoke Topology

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    O

    On the Fortinet router make sure you have the necessary firewall policies and the source/destinations for each policy are set up correctly.

    Please also reference my post on this thread: https://forum.netgate.com/post/1169622

    The correct way to set up hub/spoke topology in multi-platform setting would be use 0.0.0.0/0 routing via IPSEC interfraces. However, this was broken in 24.03 and I'm afraid it will be broken in 2.8.0 CE as well, despite this functionality being there for years and working flawlessly.

  • Ipsec behind NAT to Public IP

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    580 Views
    P

    @viragomann They are all set to any already. that was my exact thinking get them up and then tighten them down once they were up.

  • VTI gateways not adding static routes in 24.03

    88
    0 Votes
    88 Posts
    16k Views
    O

    I thought I'd do some further testing with earlier versions of CE, specifically 2.6.0.

    I'm happy to report that 0.0.0.0/0 works identically to 2.7.2. That version was released in the beginning of 2022..

  • Trust Relationship with primary DC broken

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    640 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPSec Failover - Primary and Secondary Tunnels?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    189 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPsec VPN with Active Directory RADIUS/NPS and 2FA

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    967 Views
    C

    I found the missing link!

    On the NPS server, I had to set the following registry entry:

    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\AzureMf Create the following String/Value pair: Name: OVERRIDE_NUMBER_MATCHING_WITH_OTP Value = FALSE

    Then I had to restart the Network Policy Service and BINGO! I got the approve sign-in notification on my phone when I tested the RADIUS logon. Because I had number matching turned on in my tenant, the extension was falling back to TOTP which obviously won't work with MSCHAPv2.

    See this link:
    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/authentication/how-to-mfa-number-match#nps-extension

  • IPSEC VPN AZURE VTI

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    376 Views
    LarryFahnoeL

    Have you read https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/ipsec/routed-vti.html?

    That doc suggests configuring a transit network (which could be a /30), and that the two endpoints of the transit network would be configured as ADDRESS rather than NETWORK in the P2.

    You don't mention which version you're running, but if you are on 24.03, note this thread https://forum.netgate.com/topic/188214/vti-gateways-not-adding-static-routes-in-24-03/. There is a patch to address the issue of the necessary static routes not being added.

    --Larry

  • AWS VPN Wizard does not assign P2 reqid resulting in broken tunnels

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    217 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfSense 2.7.2 IKEv2 MS-ADCS

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    322 Views
    C

    @nzlv
    Your Virtual Net Address pool is not configured correctly. The 24 should be in the drop down and not in the IP range. I have to wonder if this is somehow messing things up routing wise.

    05597bd7-477f-4424-8363-271f83984494-image.png

    Also, I think you may want to check the "Provide a list of accessible networks to clients" on the Mobile Clients tab.
    b484b850-6638-47ec-924e-c5c866fcbdc9-image.png

  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    295 Views
    A

    @Anders-Mogensen-0 After many hours of troubleshooting, I found a "rough" unit on the network with the same IP!
    But it is still strange, that disabling the WAN1 port, would make everything work as expected...

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.