• Windows Live Messenger Problem With Dual wan Pfsense

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    L
    Please somebody help me. I need help. I am trying everything. But i cant getting the solution. I hope anybody will give me any advice so that i can solve it. thank you
  • 0 Votes
    13 Posts
    7k Views
    M
    thanks man.
  • Multi WAN - Port Forwarding

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • MAC address based outbound route thru VPN tunnel.

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • MPLS Link - Help

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    Double check static routes. Have you tried enabling System - advanced - Bypass firewall rules for traffic on the same interface? I had the same problem and that fixed it.
  • Routing problems with Muti ips

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Multi WAN connection

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    ?
    http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-WAN_Version_1.2.x
  • Trying to get multiWAN to work on 2.0

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Use randomly 3 WAN interfaces

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    D
    thanks !
  • 2 Locations 2 WAN + PTPT1 Want to fail over internet from location 1 - 2

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Multi Public IP on PFsense

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    I
    Given that you have a single link, I can't imagine you will see a performance increase by doing this.  If you can explain what your goals are in load balancing the five IPs on the same link I think it might help the group supply you with the optimal solution.  Also, do all of your five IP addresses use the same gateway?  If so you will have trouble with pfSense 1.2.x and will need to install intermediate NAT devices on each (all but one actually) of the interfaces.
  • Yahoo Messenger Video Call

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    Cry HavokC
    Have you checked with a packet capture tool (such as Wireshark) or even looked at the pfSense states table to see what's going on?
  • Bandwidth load balancing for more speed

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    Cry HavokC
    Please read this sticky. Your setup will be the middle scenario.
  • Public IPs on the DMZ with VLAN tagging

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • MultiWan and routing traffic

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Apinger **delay** how to interpret

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    11k Views
    S
    You should be able to configure apinger from Diagnostic : Edit file /var/etc/apinger.conf Standard values: ## "Down" alarm definition. ## This alarm will be fired when target doesn't respond for 30 seconds. alarm down "down" { time 10s } ## "Delay" alarm definition. ## This alarm will be fired when responses are delayed more than 200ms ## it will be canceled, when the delay drops below 100ms alarm delay "delay" { delay_low 200ms delay_high 500ms } ## "Loss" alarm definition. ## This alarm will be fired when packet loss goes over 20% ## it will be canceled, when the loss drops below 10% alarm loss "loss" { percent_low 10 percent_high 20 } In 2.0 these settings are in the GUI: System: Gateways: Edit gateway
  • General Question pfsense MULTI WAN Rules and ERROR in Routes ?!

    Locked
    23
    0 Votes
    23 Posts
    8k Views
    N
    Yes, bridging is Layer 2
  • Two servers, two internet ips two local ips = No forwarding

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    If i request a NAT IP from pfsense with dhcp, the forward will work, but then i loose my connectivity on the ubuntu server, and the real IP on that server no longer works.. DHCP overrides your default gateway on your linux box. Shouldn't it just work when you put back the default gateway after that (or don't change it at all?)? And why is this in there: 192.168.1.0    192.168.1.9    255.255.255.255 UGH  0      0        0 eth0 this should be enough: 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.6 109.189.137.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 109.189.137.246 default via 109.189.137.1 dev eth1 Or am I missing something here…
  • Seperated internal private networks can talk to each other by default??

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    got it myself.  thanks.  i added a block outbound rule on the DMZ to not allow it to go to the private subnet and put it above the all outbound and that is working.  thanks!
  • Multi-WAN CARP VPN site to site

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    A
    Bumping post again, hoping for a reply. i someone knows it can be done and even if takes more then 4 pfsense units, please reply. Arthur.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.