• voip line pfSense states

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    376 Views
    No one has replied
  • Windows server 2019, Hmail server and port 25

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    R
    @johnpoz thanks for the advice. I'm not a pro that's why I'm asking for help to people that is actually doing it and tried to do it before. And also want to learn more about the process involved behind all these. Thanks again
  • Pure NAT: What is the IP Address that I see?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    457 Views
    V
    @demux AT least if client and server are connected to the same interface (request are coming in and going out on the same interface) pfSense turns the source IP into its interface IP. If they are connected to different internal interfaces it might be the origin source IP, don't know. But it's never the WAN address.
  • Hosting connectivity oddities behind pfSense

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    698 Views
    S
    @easy-hostingnz It defaults to disabled. Enabling it there enables reflection for all rules. Alternately you can edit a NAT rule and change NAT Reflection from "system default" to enable it. Reflection sends that connection/traffic through the router, while split DNS doesn't use the router because the devices uses a LAN IP. If the NAT doesn't translate ports then either will work.
  • Questions about using NAT

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    623 Views
    E
    @kom As it happens I started at step one, describing deleting and starting fresh each offensive rule. I also ensured to add logging to the WAN firewall rule that is automatically generated. I'm not sure how that should've helped but it has seemingly solved the issue. I have yet to be able to try logging into the host from an actual outside source but so far the program used to log in has a browser method that seems to be different from connecting via LAN. Thank you again, I'll be leaning heavier into the documentation in the future.
  • upnp port to firewall with one click?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    350 Views
    No one has replied
  • Access public IPv4s from LAN

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    H
    @hrustakv I fixed the problem. I didn't have a bridge built over the WAN, only on LAN ports. :)
  • NAT befor IPSec with VIP

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    This is exactly what I had tried to do, as this has always worked in previous versions. However, I can configure this in whatever VPN tunnel, but it is not applied. The pfsense acts as if the P2 does not exist and I see that no NAT is applied. I can't find any error in the log files either. Doesn't anyone else have this problem, I can't imagine it. Especially since my configuration for the PFSense is now also not so very extensive.
  • Allowing url traffic from Devops

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    404 Views
    No one has replied
  • NAT for the same ports to different LAN IPs

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    iulianteodorI
    @kiokoman Automaticaly generated, dont edit manually. Generated on: 2022-06-03 22:53 global maxconn 1000 stats socket /tmp/haproxy.socket level admin expose-fd listeners uid 80 gid 80 nbproc 1 nbthread 1 hard-stop-after 15m chroot /tmp/haproxy_chroot daemon server-state-file /tmp/haproxy_server_state listen HAProxyLocalStats bind 127.0.0.1:2200 name localstats mode http stats enable stats admin if TRUE stats show-legends stats uri /haproxy/haproxy_stats.php?haproxystats=1 timeout client 5000 timeout connect 5000 timeout server 5000 frontend frontend80 bind xx.xx.xx.xx:80 name xx.xx.xx.xx:80 mode http log global option http-keep-alive timeout client 30000 acl expressite var(txn.txnhost) -m beg -i www.expresxxxx.com acl expresmail var(txn.txnhost) -m beg -i mail.expresxxxx.com acl ramsite var(txn.txnhost) -m beg -i www.ramxxxx.ro acl nappasite var(txn.txnhost) -m beg -i www.nappaxxxx.ro acl emisite var(txn.txnhost) -m beg -i www.emimaragro.ro acl expresrosite var(txn.txnhost) -m beg -i www.expresxxxx.ro acl rammail var(txn.txnhost) -m beg -i mail.ramxxxx.ro acl nappamail var(txn.txnhost) -m beg -i mail.nappaxxxx.ro http-request set-var(txn.txnhost) hdr(host) use_backend backend-http8080_ipvANY if expressite use_backend backend-http80_ipvANY if expresmail use_backend backend-http8080_ipvANY if ramsite use_backend backend-http8080_ipvANY if nappasite use_backend backend-http8080_ipvANY if emisite use_backend backend-http8080_ipvANY if expresrosite use_backend backend-http80_ipvANY if rammail use_backend backend-http80_ipvANY if nappamail backend backend-http8080_ipvANY mode http id 100 log global option log-health-checks timeout connect 30000 timeout server 30000 retries 3 option httpchk OPTIONS / server website 192.168.1.4:8080 id 101 check inter 1000 weight 250 backend backend-http80_ipvANY mode http id 102 log global timeout connect 30000 timeout server 30000 retries 3 option httpchk OPTIONS / server webmail 192.168.1.3:80 id 103 check inter 1000
  • VMware VMs not finding pfsense IP

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    458 Views
    No one has replied
  • SIP port forward from WAN to OpenVPN Client

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    793 Views
    B
    I can register the client to the PBX. The problem is that I have no audio at all. Something with the RTP traffic. When I connect the PBX and client to openvpn I have no problems. Everything works. The problem arise when I try to use pfSense public IP. I think is something with the UDP Nat
  • [Bug?] pfSense empirically causing legacy WordPress sites to fail

    33
    0 Votes
    33 Posts
    4k Views
    johnpozJ
    @c-amie said in [Bug?] pfSense empirically causing legacy WordPress sites to fail: We have no control over what internal code to someone's WordPress site is doing. Valid point.. One way to fix it would be to put the servers actually on a public IP via routed network behind pfsense.
  • Outbound NAT: TCP working fine, UDP not at all

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Hi, to complete the topic: the patch worked for me and solved the issue. Thank you
  • Inconsistent Port Forwarding Results

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    670 Views
    R
    @mistermince Have you opened the ports on the firewall rules as well or just created the port forwarding rules? Can you post screen shots of you rules and port forwards?
  • DNS redirect issue: Reply from unexpected source

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    FIXED: I don't know why and how to check more deeply this issue: Following the documentation, to standarize every config. With Redirect target IP 127.0.0.1 as shown on the picture below. All the DNS answers came from the LAN address (each vlan) [image: redirect_dns_port_forward.png] Fixed with: Redirect target IP LAN_XX address
  • Blue Iris Remote access?

    47
    1 Votes
    47 Posts
    12k Views
    E
    @jarhead Ok, all good then. Thanks again for your help.
  • PMP-NAT on Carp interface

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    825 Views
    I
    @dsmith10 Has anyone ever found the solution to this? I'm running into the same issue. Tailscale can't port translate automatically because we have a CARP IP for our LAN's gateway.
  • Assigning public IP on instance

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    615 Views
    No one has replied
  • Multiple WAN interfaces - NAT problem

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    @viragomann Great tip, that's how it works for me. Thanks you very much for the effort!!!
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.