if u mean by client IP address, than it can't pfsense qos is based on cbq and altq

Both are VIA C3's (I think) running at 1Ghz. Both have 512Mb RAM

may be u can increase the qwanack n qlanack , try double it….

Good afternoon :) Cacheboy works on throtling videos :) jigp 1.2.2

check your pm.

In theory the limiter could be used to setup a dynamic pipe/queue for each flow (sort of) through the router.  That would let you set the exact bandwidth each flow would be allowed to use.  pfSense doesn't currently support doing that via the gui though, probably for good reason. Take a look at the dummynet documentation at http://www.dummynet.com/ Dynamic queue creation: mask … It is possible to associate a mask to a pipe so that bandwidth and queue limitations are enforced separately for packets belonging to different flows. The mask command lets you specify which parts of the following fields contribute to identify a flow: [proto N] [src-ip N] [dst-ip N] [src-port N] [dst-port N] where N is a bitmask where significant bits are set to 1. You can specify one or more masks, or the all keyword to mean that all fields are fully significant. The default (when no mask are specified) is to ignore all fields, so that all packets are considered to belong to the same flow. Whenever a new flow is encountered, a new queue (with the specified bandwidth and queue size) is created. WARNING!!! the number of dynamic queues that can be created in this way can become very large. They are accessed through a hash table, whose size you can define using the buckets NN specifier after the mask command. This would probably be pretty resource intensive to keep up, it probably isn't suitable for actual real life use.

hi make high priority of queue for queue where high priority data is passing…

thanks, i will read it 1st

Your RPD are inside the IPSec VPN? If yes, you can't shape what's inside … You could, but you'd need 2 pfSense boxes at both end. Like that : Network #1 <--> pfSense (Shaper) <--> pfSense (IPSec) <--> Internet <--> pfSense (IPSec) <--> pfSense (Shaper) <--> Network #2 The pfSense (Shaper) would have normal LAN/WAN scenario that the spaher is happy with and the pfSense (IPSec) would take care of the Internet connection and IPSec. In this scenario you'll have to use 4 different Class C private IP range. MageMinds

solved, just applied rules again, and now traffic shaper does not limit LAN bandwidth , why? I do not why! but it works.

Create a set of queues that have higher priority then other regular traffic (not as high as the ACK queues of course), create a rule set that matches your desired traffic patterns, and assign them to your newly created queues. Since these queues will be higher priority then the rest of the traffic on the network, and those rules are the only ones sending traffic to them, your desired traffic will have higher priority over all the rest of the traffic.

Use the wizard and tell it the IP address of your Asterisk. If you want to create rules by yourself here are mine. I have an alias for my Asterisk server as you can see in the image below. [image: yiao8.png]

This is a very old post, but could you give a follow up to what you did to fix your problem, if you ever got it resolved?

start with these: http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Traffic_Shaping_Guide http://devwiki.pfsense.org/wikka.php?wakka=HFSCBandwidthShapingNotes …