• Sticky Connections?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    D

    Awesome, thanks Perry.  It seems to flip back and forth every now and then now :)

    In this case, since I'm not using sticky connections, I need to set up policy-based routing for certain types of connections, right?  Like ssh, https (443), etc?

  • Targets For Shaper Rules

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • CPU Utilization High

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    C

    Thanks for the reply, I already resolve the issue by removing the dns server on pfsense because it is the one using most of the cpu. are there any links for improvements of 1.2.1? :)

  • Giving Priority to specific ports

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    GruensFroeschliG

    @XDJ:

    @ermal:

    Is it so hard to search/read othe rposts before posting?!

    Gee, I never thought of that!  ???

    Is it so hard to realize that maybe I did not find anything that (in my limited knowledge of the subject) appeared to apply to my specific situation?  If was very knowledgeable about Traffic Shaping and Queues I wouldn't have asked for help.

    Makes me miss the warm and fuzzy treatment of the Smoothwall team!

    How would you feel after reading the same question over and over and over again from people that didnt even try to search if their answer is around?
    The forum has a search function for a reason ;)

    (Also i dont think the smoothwall developers interact with their users directly without payment..)

  • A queue used for varios IPs = PROBLEM

    Locked
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    6k Views
    E

    Can i have some feedback from this?

  • Puting limit to outbound traffic….

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    gilbertonunes33G

    Thanks for your response Ermal

    In fact, I think about it, and I supose something like an accounting system.
    I will search for something…
    Meantime, , how can I restrict the dowload  bandwidth base on IP address?
    Sorry for ask this, but I really a newbie and don't understand much about traffic shapping...

    Thanks again!

  • Need help in shaping the traffic

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    D

    now the traffic shaper are really mess… accessing the webGUI takes very long time.... so i can't remove the wizard  :'(  :'(  :'(  :'(  :'(

  • Queues and multiple interfaces

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • IP address on the WAN not expected when coming from a NAT+shaped+LAN host

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Load balancing/traffic shaping with MAC address

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Shaping for dummies

    Locked
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    6k Views
    M

    stechnique
    well the goal was to approximate this with percentages
    uasing a percentile seemed easier I only specified the values above
    because I thought that may be better since the percentage values
    are giving me such a hard time ( thinking by specifiying it I can make shure
    the math of the child ques doesnt exceed 100% of the parent ques )
    which should fix the errors I get

    Ermal that is a most helpful explanation
    hopefully this may help some others as well

    Thank you muchly

  • Ssh port non-standard

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Traffic bursting

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    A

    I would love to help with this if anyone is interested.  There's not really any documentation needed any more than what is already here really.  I was using the latest 1.2 stable release, set 4/1 down/up, and set all upperlimit on the download to
    m1=20%
    d=12000 (12 seconds)
    m2=10%

    Or whatever you'd like for the values, and checkmark
    *Random Early Detection
    *Random Early Detection In and Out
    *Explicit Congestion Notification
    *This is a parent queue

    I have a 1.72 P4 cpu, 1 gig ram, 35gb drive, and two 3COM NIC's, one for LAN, other for WAN.  I just wanted something simple, checkmark some things, and implement.  This seems to have done it.  I was missing the Random Early Detection, Random Early Detection In and Out, and Explicit Congestion Notification checkmarks, after that everything is working, and ha been running so far for 10 days, and 3.5 hours.  I connected it to a linksys wrt54g router with DD-WRT with dhcp relay set to point to the pfSense box, which is doing dhcp, and each client can connect and do whatever pretty much, and not have the WAN side go crazy with too much traffic.

    If you'd like i will find my old post, copy/paste this -> to that, and you can close this one, so no duplicates.

  • Ventrilo tips and tricks?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    5k Views
    No one has replied
  • Bandwidth limit/shaping?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    ?

    Anyone? Any link?

  • How-to?? No NAT, No Packet Filter, + with Shaping.

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    E

    Probably multicast issue, you have to allow that in the firewall.

  • If shaping between lan and wan, what happens to opt1 traffic?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    E

    Any outoging traffic on an interface where shaping occurs will be effected by the policy in place.
    So the traffic leaving lan will be shaped the incoming on lan no.

    (Beaware that this limit is removed on 1.3, just as an FYI).

  • Need basic help with queues

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    C

    Cheers for that - a very good link. Until the 'book' is finished it will have to do.

  • I think I'm doing it wrong…

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    L

    You haven't given anyone the details necessary to answer your question.  The number of people doing traffic shaping on multiple WANs is probably fairly small.  The knowledgeable people who may have read your initial question may have been to busy ask you for more basic details so they could offer a suggestion.

    You did not explicitly identify which version of pfSense you are using.

    You also pretty much answered yourself in your question by saying that you "know that Multi-WAN and Traffic shaping isn't working quite right."  I would bet you have already seen the answer in the forums or wiki to have come to that conclusion.

    I do not have multiple WANs setup so I can't help you.  Your follow-up came off a little pushy, so I thought I would try to give you some possible reasons why you have not gotten a response.

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.