@Mat1987 Just to add. I can connect using a mobile hotspot but when using work connectiong its trying to use 1194 as local port. Mat

@azmodeuz said in OpenVPN SSL Site to Site - I am unable to push DNS to Site B and access a routed network in Site A from Site B: I set pfSense3 as OpenVPN Server so remote users are connected locally to communicate with our Local Net. Would this still be possible if I use pfSense2 as the OpenVPN Server? You will need a static route on pfSense3 for the OpenVPN tunnel network 192.168.121.0/24 pointing to pfSense2. @azmodeuz said in OpenVPN SSL Site to Site - I am unable to push DNS to Site B and access a routed network in Site A from Site B: Re: NAT, how should I do NAT to get responses back to pfSense3? You can add an outbound NAT rule on pfSense3 (S-NAT, also known as masquerading) which translates the source IP in packets from the remote site of the VPN into the DMZ interface address. So responses are sent back to pfSense3. However, that's a dirty solution and is not recommended if there are multiple clients connecting through the VPN.

Boa tarde, O Open-VPN funciona bem no pfsense se você segue as seguintes descrições: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/openvpn/openvpn-remote-access-server.html https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/openvpn/using-the-openvpn-client-export-package.html Gostaria de mencionar que o suporte oficial ao Windows 7 terminou, portanto lembre-se disso por questões de segurança. isso causa um problema: [image: 1590517786999-bd25ae00-1dec-40ed-9447-24049653c980-image.png] Cumps, C

As addresses of RAS VPNs are handed out via DHCP there's no way I know of, that you could persuade the server to hand out a dial-in client more then one IP.

@Rico Thank you for noticing my post. This is my layout The pfSense2 is my Public Firewall or gateway. INTERNET == pfSense1 (Client) --- LAN B (192.168.140.0/24) --- PC B (192.168.140.10) || pfSense2 (Gateway) --- DMZ net (192.168.88.0/24) --- pfSense3 (Server) --- LAN (192.168.8.0/24) LAN B and LAN A can communicate properly except that I am unable to push DNS to LAN B pfSense3 which is both the DNS and OpenVPN server. PC B can ping pfSense3 LAN 192.168.8.1 and WAN 192.168.88.7 but I cannot ping pfSense2 LAN 192.168.88.5.

[image: 1590420908925-0d3ea926-0ee8-448a-b636-d2f2ae2835a6-image.png] This is a selectable list. So select your EXPRESS as the default gateway ... ) Like : @Gertjan said in ExpressVPN OpenVPN won't work: While here System > Routing > Gateways, select / activate the "VPN CLIENT" gateway as the default "Default gateway IPv4".

@johnpoz I still have some 32 bit apps that i can not do without... and as far as I know Catalina doesn't support 32bit anymore.

@DominikHoffmann said in Help with adjusting the VPN port: @JeGr, how do mark this topic as “[Solved]” in the topic subject line? Can I? not exactly marking it but you can edit your OP and write a [Solved] in your topic line yourself - that works just fine.

@Rico it is temporary in that the situation does not survive a pfSense reboot. I am working remotely right now, but was able to ssh into the box, in order to reboot it. As for rebuilding the configuration from factory settings, that will have to wait. Also, it seems that renaming an interface not part of an active OpenVPN connection does not cause a loss of connectivity the the LAN.

@helenodss said in VPN error when connecting to client...: (check your network connectivity) There is normally the BIG clue.. Can this client ping your vpn IP? Do you see an connection attempt in your openvpn log on pfsense from this client? It just very well might the simple he can not get to you issue. Then figure out why.. Maye where he is at blocks the port your using for vpn..

Oh okay Thanks alot man! :) didnt think of that actually.

if you have Automatic outbound NAT or Hybrid ,the NAT rule will be created automatically if it is manual you need to create it.

@Gektor Link to video?

i have some google home stuff with embedded 8.8.8.8 on it, I only use NAT, Port Forward to redirect all query to my dns server

@viragomann thanks, will do.