Ok, so I tried 1.2.2 and it didn't work for me. Now, I'm running 1.2.3-RC1 and it finally works. FYI. Thanks, Julian

Thank you, that answer very helpfull

@submicron: Or if you have multiple public IP addresses, you can use 1:1 NAT. Dear submicron, i have public IP from my ISP is 203.xxx.xxx.xxx/29, there is 6 public IP i can use for my server. How can i use this ?? Do you have 1:1 NAT tutorial / example for me..?? regards ??

If the hardware were under a high interrupt load, that could affect ping or even high cpu usage. It would take more information as to what your box is doing during these instances where ping times fluctuate.

Then pfSense is probably not for you.  There is no centralized management system for pfSense and the webGUI is the way to administer the system.

See the blog concerning NanoBSD builds.

Thank you. I try Skype  and it's works… InternetCalls has not UPnP into connection settings. Perhaps I have some configuration's problems into my pfSense pc... Into Traffic Graph I see that I have traffic only on LAN interface but no traffic by WAN interf. pfSense is a member of a Net that has a router and both pfSense's connections are into the LAN but the router (gateway) is signed for wan interface .. it's very strange becouse the internet navigation for the client works fine.

Again: Do you own a public to you routed subnet? Can you elaborate how traffic to you comes for this public IP? Depending on this you can/have to router or brigde.

You can't.  Use a remote syslog server to log to if you intend to keep your log data.

@jahonix: XZed, I can imagine what your driving force was. Been there, done that. I still have some old ISDN and DSL cards laying around. Look at it this way: technology is changing that fast analog/ISDN/ADSL/ADSL2/ADSL2+/VDSL/3G that it is weasier to use a separate, dedicated box as bridge between your outside connection layer and an ethernet port on the internal side. When upgrading to a higher speed connection all you have to do is change out the bridge. well, at least, i'm relieved that someone understand me  ;D old school style ;D but, finally, i "accepted" your vision way and, in fact, you're right… ok, topic closed  ;D thank you, sincerely,

The Cisco 7940G should do the trick….:) @rsw686: Are the phones going to use separate network jacks or are you planning on using the phones that have the switch inside to pass the data through to the computer? If your using the phones with the built-in switch the majority of them are only 10/100 unless you are purchasing the higher end phones which have gigabit switches inside. Just something to think about because if the phones only support 10/100 then a gigabit switch is not gaining you anything.

You have to have a gateway for each Vlan….. Use Virtuel IP for this. Otherwise PFsense dont know the Vlans are there, if it do not have a gateway to contact...

Sorry for my late reply, we had some problems with the hardware so the pc had to go in for repair. When the pc returned a couple of days ago, it seems that the nic wasn't working as suppost to. So we replaced the nics with working ones and everything is working fine now. Thanks for the help.

I have this problem as well, happens randomly… hasn't happened for a while though.