It depends on the status of the box (full install vs NanoBSD, etc) but in general that works OK. Read the upgrade guide on the wiki. Be sure to check the config as suggested there. I have done remote upgrades on even NanoBSD installs using console upgrade by URL that went from 1.2.3-RC1 up to 2.0.1-RELEASE without issues.

http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/I_locked_myself_out_of_the_WebGUI,_help!

SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED quick answer: disable ACPI on boot choosing option 2! Later follow http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Booting_Options#Disabling_ACPI to make it permanent. long history: I was having another problems with that machine… and it was not production yet... so I started to debug. I was worried about how slow it was! I was worried about error messages about timeout and missing interrupts on NICs. I was worried about PPPoE do not work JUST FOR ME ... and I REALLLY WANNA TO HAVE PPPoE to avoid double NAT! So I started to change settings / replace items! I replate 2 NICs twice I replace all CABLES involved I replace ADSL modem nothing helps. I choose DHCP to WAN and discovered my future pfSense2 firewall was taking 1 minute to get an IP from modem... on a direct connection. So... should be something on machine...not in pfS2, not in other HW (NIC, cable, modem). With that information was easy...  my first tought was to disable ACPI... a long history of problems with it (never one had included this sintoms!) in just one minute I was a HAPPY user! Now I'll SCREAM this in ANY forum I can find SOMEONE with PPPoE problem... it's a simple and quick test!!!

A search of the forums for alc0 found a couple of topics which suggest the alc driver is built in the kernel. See, for example, http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,30729.0.html which demonstrates the alc driver was built into a 2.0 snapshot kernel. Please provide the output of the pfSense command``` dmesg ; pciconf -l

I have exactly the same problem with the AVAYA phone and pfsense. Was anyone able to fix this?

When I setup WAN2, should I set the load balancer? I have read several

actualyl i seem to be having a more serious issue i can't connect to my webserver on WAN, but others can. For my 2nd modem which is also accessible I can access that one to my webserver, and others can see it. I did not always have this issue, it seems brand new. I don't see where it could have come from. What's strange is that my 2nd modem works just fine.

You can also try negotiate mode instead of ntlm http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Authenticate/WindowsActiveDirectory

Try to include on squid custom options http_access allow all

jimp, Thanks for the explanation! In that form I will include the link you provided. As far as background music I created that using GarageBand. We'll see how it goes. @jimp: Not sure it would matter for pfSense since it's an Open Source project and you're just showing screenshots of it. The code is BSD licensed and it's not like it's a secret or there's an NDA or anything. There are no provisions in the license to prevent the commercial use of the software. If they insist, just point them at our license: http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=42&Itemid=62 The only time you might have an issue is if you're claiming to "be" pfSense but that doesn't appear to be the case here. I'd say they're more worried about your background music than the software you're showing.

oops. make a booboo. will return shortly

@luke240778: Thanks again. I have found the CLient Isolation on the Ubiquiti AP's but not on the Ruckus AP's yet. Will take a look at their Manuals when i arrive in the office tomorrow.  Hopefully it will work.  I am hopefully getting a managed switch soon so maybe in the end i can do it all on there.. ? If the customers connect directly to your WLAN AP then you must configure that on the AP. The switch behind the AP does not really help because all clients connected to the same WLAN AP will continue to talk to each other. Example: customer–---- customer ------ AP ----- customer------/ Isolation on AP needed do block connection between clients. customer------ customer ------ AP1-------- customer------/                                                        Switch customer------\                  / customer ------ AP2 --------/ customer------/ If isolation can only be done on the switch than there is no communication possible between customers on AP1 and customers on AP2 but the customers on the same AP can still communicate.

Luke, Configure you access point in route mode without nat, this way you will have all clients ip on your dhcp /radius/firewall. But on any setup(bridge/route/route+nat), your clients can setup an access point with cloned mac address from configured machine and share their connections.

Have anybody will do network exchenge?  :)

None If your WAN have a public IP This is only usefull if your WAN have a "Private" IP (RFC1918) He's just replying without reading that you have solved the problem. Maybe you can Edit the Thread Title and add [SOLVED] to it.

No requests were denied nor are any of the pools close to the maximum value so it looks as if the problem wasn't one of running out of a kernel network resource.

Yes, That sounds correct. Just don't forget the firewall rules. The destination is not the external IP, but the internal IP (10.0.0.22).

@Metu69salemi: Two tasks to comply  ;) 1. Goto Firewall:Schedules 1.1 Create ones as you need 2. Goto Firewall:Rules 2.1 Apply schedule on rules what you want(search below 'normal' view) Hint: I'd use block all on top of the list and schedule it to go online during that night time, then you don't have to modify every single rule on the list Thank you Metu69salemi. I used your suggestion and achieved. Regards, SGTR

thank you very much !